|
Title: Paul Smith Post by: STFCere on Friday, April 21, 2006, 11:24:21 on the BBC website it says that he is a doubt for Brentford because hes suffered a reaction to his knee injury. is this just typical BBC inaccurate reporting or is it actually true?
if it is we are fucked. Title: Paul Smith Post by: Luci on Friday, April 21, 2006, 11:28:13 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/eng_div_2/4908090.stm
Its a shame but I guess it depended on todays training session, ah well, they're just going to have to pull out all the stops tomorrow, Smith or no Smith. Title: Paul Smith Post by: STFCere on Friday, April 21, 2006, 11:33:40 his age, composure and influence are his greatest assets in our young and inexperienced team. and hes the only midfield player who can really control the game. i just cant see us winning it without paul :(
Title: Paul Smith Post by: Piemonte on Friday, April 21, 2006, 11:37:50 I'm going to invent a "get fit Paul Smith" dance and perform it all afternoon. :dance:
It will be much like a raindance except will make the aging midfielder get fit rather than make it rain, or possibly make ageing midfielders fall from the sky. or something Title: Paul Smith Post by: DV on Friday, April 21, 2006, 11:40:10 hopefully rubbish...for starters wasnt it his ankle and not knee...?
Title: Paul Smith Post by: STFCere on Friday, April 21, 2006, 11:41:35 Quote from: "DV85" hopefully rubbish...for starters wasnt it his ankle and not knee...? hope your right, take a look at the BBC website Title: Paul Smith Post by: Piemonte on Friday, April 21, 2006, 12:01:24 It would seem STFCere is the inaccurate reporter.... the BBC site says ankle not knee :D
Title: Paul Smith Post by: fatbury on Friday, April 21, 2006, 12:06:31 damn nooooooooooooo
Title: Paul Smith Post by: Sussex on Friday, April 21, 2006, 12:12:52 Sloppy BBC I hope. Official site doesn't mention it:
Quote Paul Smith should feature after returning to the side at Scunthorpe United on Monday. :shrug: Title: Paul Smith Post by: STFCere on Friday, April 21, 2006, 12:48:25 even if he was injured id say keep him on and just let him stand in the middle all game, much more effective than pook or any of the other wasters
Title: Paul Smith Post by: Luci on Friday, April 21, 2006, 12:49:36 He wasn't fully ready to play Monday but they took the gamble.....its definitely one worth taking IMO.
Title: Paul Smith Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Friday, April 21, 2006, 14:18:14 he will play anyway! if he goes off we are fucked but if he doesnt start we are fucked anyway so we have to
Title: Paul Smith Post by: sonicyouth on Friday, April 21, 2006, 15:10:53 if he starts or he's on the bench, we'll win.
if he's injured then you might as well not turn up. Title: Paul Smith Post by: Simon Pieman on Friday, April 21, 2006, 15:15:32 I'd play him from the start and risk him that way. Hopefully we will get more of a hold on the game from the offset that way and then bring on a fresher sub later.
Title: Paul Smith Post by: Piemonte on Friday, April 21, 2006, 15:19:12 start the peaconator too
I'm going to be on the way to spain during the game :evil: Title: Paul Smith Post by: Spencer_White on Friday, April 21, 2006, 16:35:53 Peacock will end up finnishing his career if hes not careful. Hes clearly playing on injections and all credit to the bloke. But we need him back next season - AS CAPTAIN!
Title: Paul Smith Post by: Bennett on Friday, April 21, 2006, 16:37:03 Quote from: "Spencer_White" AS CAPTAIN! good shout that man |