Thetownend.com

25% => Players => Topic started by: Fred Elliot on Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 23:06:37



Title: MIGZ
Post by: Fred Elliot on Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 23:06:37
For a wannabe skipper you are a fucking disgrace !

Fuck off to Swansea with Rory or better still the US of A !

All you Migz fans that want to have a go ................. come on over and justify why the lazy cunt is picked with a distinct lack of credentials !


Title: MIGZ
Post by: DV on Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 23:08:44
I'm Migz biggest fan, but again tonight he was awful but he wasnt alone in being awful.

Singling him out is harsh, there are 11 men on that pitch and not one of them did their job tonight.

The thing is with Migz, he is our main man. When he plays well we play well, he pulls the strings he makes us tick.

When he doesnt get into the game we do jack shit!


Title: MIGZ
Post by: Fred Elliot on Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 23:13:28
Its the same old fucking story though with him ............... he will have maybe 5 games a year when he really bosses things then has a formidably shit run of games but gets picked on the merit of the last "great" game he had ............ its just not right !

And if you really  think he is our "main man" then you are seriously deluded my friend


Title: MIGZ
Post by: STFC Village on Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 23:14:46
Quote from: "Fred Elliot"
And if you really  think he is our "main man" then you are seriously deluded my friend
Who is then?


Title: MIGZ
Post by: DV on Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 23:15:50
Quote from: "Fred Elliot"
Its the same old fucking story though with him ............... he will have maybe 5 games a year when he really bosses things then has a formidably shit run of games but gets picked on the merit of the last "great" game he had ............ its just not right !

And if you really  think he is our "main man" then you are seriously deluded my friend


OK, who could we have played today instead of Migz in the middle of the park? please tell me....

He is our main man, I am not deluded, but as I said when he plays well we play well.....


Title: MIGZ
Post by: DV on Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 23:16:13
Quote from: "STFC Village"
Quote from: "Fred Elliot"
And if you really  think he is our "main man" then you are seriously deluded my friend
Who is then?


Rory :wink:


Title: MIGZ
Post by: STFC Village on Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 23:17:24
Quote from: "DV85"
Quote from: "STFC Village"
Quote from: "Fred Elliot"
And if you really  think he is our "main man" then you are seriously deluded my friend
Who is then?


Rory :wink:
Is, not was :wink:


Title: MIGZ
Post by: DV on Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 23:18:57
Quote from: "STFC Village"
Quote from: "DV85"
Quote from: "STFC Village"
Quote from: "Fred Elliot"
And if you really  think he is our "main man" then you are seriously deluded my friend
Who is then?


Rory :wink:
Is, not was :wink:


In that case....its Yeovil Red


Title: MIGZ
Post by: Tails on Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 23:19:20
Peacock deserves some credit.

On several occasions he ran 30/40 yards to win the ball, one time he shielded a ball out for a goal kick. In fact, he's now my favourite player.

Migz is terrible at the moment.


Title: MIGZ
Post by: DV on Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 23:20:51
Dare I say it I though Pook did alright, at least he put some effort it. Drove forward, got stuck in a bit.

Im not saying he was wonderful, but thought he did ok


Title: MIGZ
Post by: Tails on Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 23:23:21
Yeah he did, he has no footballing brain at all though.


Title: MIGZ
Post by: Fred Elliot on Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 23:24:15
Quote from: "STFC Village"
Quote from: "Fred Elliot"
And if you really  think he is our "main man" then you are seriously deluded my friend
Who is then?


You ever wondered why Peacock is forced to come so deep, and so leaving cureton exposed as a stand alone striker ?

Peacocks the man on attitude and workrate alone .................... take a leaf out of his book the rest of you lazy fuckers


Title: MIGZ
Post by: PHIL!!!! on Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 23:25:40
Quote from: "DV85"
I'm Migz biggest fan, but again tonight he was awful but he wasnt alone in being awful.

Singling him out is harsh, there are 11 men on that pitch and not one of them did their job tonight.

The thing is with Migz, he is our main man. When he plays well we play well, he pulls the strings he makes us tick.

When he doesnt get into the game we do jack shit!


Agree!! I'm one of his biggest fans too and although he wasnt at his best tonight, he was like you say, not alone.
I thought he showed a couple of neat touches here and there and felt he deserved to stay on and for Benjamin to go off instead.


Title: MIGZ
Post by: DV on Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 23:27:11
Benjamin wouldnt have gone off, we had no striker (roberts?) on the bench


Title: MIGZ
Post by: yeo on Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 23:27:58
Migz has been living on past glory all season.

Shame cos he used to be good .


Title: MIGZ
Post by: DV on Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 23:32:47
Quote from: "Yeovil Red"
Migz has been living on past glory all season.

Shame cos he used to be good .


Bristol City at home he was good, and Rotherham away as a make shift Centre Back he was very very good.

He has had good games this season, just not recently sadly


Title: MIGZ
Post by: Fred Elliot on Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 00:02:40
Quote from: "DV85"
Quote from: "Yeovil Red"
Migz has been living on past glory all season.

Shame cos he used to be good .


Bristol City at home he was good, and Rotherham away as a make shift Centre Back he was very very good.

He has had good games this season, just not recently sadly


You can name only two good games this season (and one of them played out of position !) and you still call him our main man ?????

No more questions your honour !!!


Title: MIGZ
Post by: DV on Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 00:04:21
Quote from: "Fred Elliot"
Quote from: "DV85"
Quote from: "Yeovil Red"
Migz has been living on past glory all season.

Shame cos he used to be good .


Bristol City at home he was good, and Rotherham away as a make shift Centre Back he was very very good.

He has had good games this season, just not recently sadly


You can name only two good games this season (and one of them played out of position !) and you still call him our main man ?????

No more questions your honour !!!


we won both games! thats a fact?

I didnt say they were his only two good games, but certainly his two best ones.

Still find me a player who has had 5/6/7/8-10 good games that you can name.....


Title: MIGZ
Post by: flammableBen on Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 00:43:10
I've been thinking about football while drinking and I'd happily play migz in the centre of defence in a 5-3-2 wingback formation. Nicholas is should be good on the left aslong as he get's cover. Right side is a problem. Lacking Centre mids so Gurney would have to be playing in the midfield. so shakes on the right with heavy defending on the right side. Of course we don't have enough central midfielders which is where my mad plan falls to pieces. Maybe have migz and gurney as the defensive midfield with roberts in an attacking mid role. Fuck knows what I'm talking about. sommin like this...

                  Evans              
      O'Hanlon   Migz   Ifil
Shakes                         Nico
           Gurney   Pook
                 Roberts
          Cureton   Peacock

Not sure our players are clever enough to play thet. Maybe Brown or Jarrett in for robberts or as subs to strengthen the wings. If you play wing backs you need to have intellegent players on either side to cover them. Always got the danger of a good switch ball but then gurney and pook should help cover that.

Fuck know what I'm on about though.


Title: MIGZ
Post by: DV on Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 10:48:30
Shakes wouldnt defend enough as a wing back.

Full choice of players and I like the 3-5-2 option

Evans

Gurney

O'Hanlon
Ifil
CCP

Nicholas

Smith
Miglioranzi
Brown

Cureton
Peacock


Title: MIGZ
Post by: McLovin on Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 11:06:36
Correct. He used to be good.

I have NEVER seen Pook put in a crunching tackle. He approaches them all with the commitment of Matt Hewlett.


Title: MIGZ
Post by: flammableBen on Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 11:23:02
I don't even remember writing that pile of bollocks. fucking hell I must have been drunk.


Title: MIGZ
Post by: le god cuervo on Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 11:29:17
we were talking about using wing-backs last night as well. i reckon...

-------------evans--------------
-------ifil--o'hanlon--CCP------
j.smith----------------nicholas
---gurney--migz--p.smith---
-----cureton--peacock-------

...would be a well 'ard team. would also give migz a bit more freedom?


Title: MIGZ
Post by: magicroundabout on Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 11:34:58
why are you all not putting in Shakes?

last night when he came on as WING BACK he traked all the way to our own line and shielded the ball out or cleared it on numerous occasions.

we seemed to brighten up when he came on.

he's a massive player for us and we need him down the wing.

J.Smith is fucking dreadful at the moment and wouldn't even play for my sunday league team.

Two men we miss at the moment is Smith and more importantly CCP.


Title: MIGZ
Post by: DMR on Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 11:36:44
I agree with everyhting the Brummie says.


Title: MIGZ
Post by: magicroundabout on Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 11:38:45
Quote from: "dave_m_russell"
I agree with everyhting the Brummie says.


cheers fat boy :eat:


Title: MIGZ
Post by: janaage on Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 12:24:00
Migs is a fair weather player.  When the sun is shining and the team is playing well, Migs will fit in nicely.  When it's fucking freezing and you're in the middle of a relegation battle Migs is not the man for the job.


Title: MIGZ
Post by: my-velocity on Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 15:36:41
If we had him paired up with P.Smith in midfield then it would be ok, he could do his little ficks and tricks and it wouldn't matter if he lost the ball because P.Smith would always be there to get the ball.

The only thing wrong with Migzi is he can't tackle to save his life.


Title: MIGZ
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 16:09:58
Migs is hidiously out of form. Don't know why.

Laugh all you like but on his day there isn't a better player in this league.

At the moment he is a liability and will find it to to get a new contract at any club based on his form since coming back from his latest mini-injury. And as a Mgiz fan it hurts me to say that.


Title: MIGZ
Post by: Johno on Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 16:31:44
pook is matt hewlett. im sure. hes puts the effort in, but is cack.


Title: MIGZ
Post by: STFC Village on Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 20:15:38
Quote from: "Batch"
Migs is hidiously out of form. Don't know why.
Bet i do. He's missing his Housemate/Bum Chum Rory


Title: MIGZ
Post by: DV on Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 22:11:54
Quote from: "magicroundabout"
why are you all not putting in Shakes?



Shakes is awful and put in exactly 0 crosses that beat the first man yesterday.


Title: MIGZ
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 22:16:06
Quote from: "DV85"
Quote from: "magicroundabout"
why are you all not putting in Shakes?



Shakes is awful and put in exactly 0 crosses that beat the first man yesterday.


 I was wondering if Ricky's new tactic of hitting it straight into the covering defender was a deliberate piece of input from Leo Beenhaker....namely its beter than just hoofing it away, or dribbling into an opponent and losing possession.

 You get a throw in usually so retain possesion.


Title: MIGZ
Post by: reeves4england on Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 22:23:20
Half the time there was nobody getting into the box anyway last night, and he didn't really have the space to get a cross in. he did right to keep possession and try to work the space.

As for Migs, I can;t understand why he has been so poor but I agree that he would benefit from having a solid player alongside him. that would give him more freedom and perhaps allow him to be more creative


Title: MIGZ
Post by: janaage on Thursday, March 9, 2006, 08:54:36
Quote from: "Reg Smeeton"
Quote from: "DV85"
Quote from: "magicroundabout"
why are you all not putting in Shakes?



Shakes is awful and put in exactly 0 crosses that beat the first man yesterday.


 I was wondering if Ricky's new tactic of hitting it straight into the covering defender was a deliberate piece of input from Leo Beenhaker....namely its beter than just hoofing it away, or dribbling into an opponent and losing possession.

 You get a throw in usually so retain possesion.


Shakes' "awful" crosses won us a couple of corners on Tuesday night, so it's not all bad.


Title: MIGZ
Post by: McLovin on Thursday, March 9, 2006, 09:20:36
His insistance on running off the pitch with the ball is a bit infuriating. He's like a poor mans Paul Edwards.


Title: MIGZ
Post by: Spud on Thursday, March 9, 2006, 15:52:08
Quote from: "Dave Blackcurrant"
His insistance on running off the pitch with the ball is a bit infuriating. He's like a poor mans Paul Edwards.


He's time wasting,just a shame he does it when we're 1 down with 70 minutes left.