Thetownend.com

25% => The Reg Smeeton Match Day Action/Reaction Forum => Topic started by: DV on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 18:49:41



Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: DV on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 18:49:41
Evans - 5 - Two good saves in the first half, shocking attempt for the 3rd goal

Smith - 4 - Not solid at all

O'Hanlon - 4 - At fault for the 2nd goal run ragged all game

Ifil - 5 - Probably our best player, some good tackles but overran

Nicholas - 4 - Offered alot going forward, looked suspect at the back

Peacock - 5 - Worked hard, at fault for 2nd goal

Cureton - 4 - Good finish for the goals, good run...quiet 2nd half

Iffys formation was weird today, I can understand the back 5 and the 2 up front but I thought it was highly stupid to face Rotherham with only 7 players. I know P.Smith and CCP are injured, but why not bother with midfield at all :evil:


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: Tails on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 18:52:24
First half they were lively, second half we lacked ideas and were second best to Rotherham.

Chin up we've still got a great chance of survival.


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: Spud on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 18:53:20
Im not going to rate anybody, Gurney and Migz were awful though.


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: DV on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 19:05:32
Quote from: "Spuddy_STFC"
Im not going to rate anybody, Gurney and Migz were awful though.


Gurney and Migz played?

no, we didnt have a midfield today, Im certain...


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 19:09:21
Evans - 7 actually played with some urgency and at times looked like the only person that cared (shame he was in goal)

Smith - 3 terrible thats all i will say

O' Hanlon - 6 looked solid and scored but did make a few mistakes

Ifil - 5 average wasn't at his best but was solid enough

Nico - 5 again solid but nothing special

Brown - 5 worked hard but didnt create anything

Gurney - 1 absolutley disgracefull!

Migz - 4 never in the game

Shakes - 4 poor crossing and no urgency

Peacock - 6 tried at least! but not his faullt he had no service!

Cureton - 6 got a goal but again no service but he did look lively


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: Johno on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 19:33:34
there midfield battled, unlike ours. thats how they won, simple as

only a minor setback, dont go slating evryone and saying thats it though please.


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: Dazzza on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 19:34:27
The performance sounded like my old folks having sex today.

Somthing I wouldn't ever want to see.


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: STFC_Chris on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 19:34:56
Cureton and Peacock are the only two that seemed to want it today. I think they thought they only had to turn up to thrash Rotheram 4 or 5-0. Far too complacent, when we scored we relaxed...thought that was it.

Well done to Rotheram though, decent side, played well...thoroughly deserve the three points on their performance.

Not impressed with Roberts today, just seemed to hoof the ball forward whenever he got it...hope it's not a sign of things to come.


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: blinkpip on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 19:35:22
They don't even deserve their names writen down.

Crap, Shit, Bollocks.


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: adje on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 19:49:48
we have CCP and smith to come back in the middle at least- gurney has been so poor of late.


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 19:53:39
Quote from: "adje"
we have CCP and smith to come back in the middle at least- gurney has been so poor of late.


 I would suggest that our chances of survival largely rest on Paul Smith....if he can stay fit then we might be OK, if it turns out longer term then I suspect we're fucked.


Title: Re: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: Arriba on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 20:07:51
Quote from: "DV85"
Evans - 5 - Two good saves in the first half, shocking attempt for the 3rd goal

Smith - 4 - Not solid at all

O'Hanlon - 4 - At fault for the 2nd goal run ragged all game

Ifil - 5 - Probably our best player, some good tackles but overran

Nicholas - 4 - Offered alot going forward, looked suspect at the back

Peacock - 5 - Worked hard, at fault for 2nd goal

Cureton - 4 - Good finish for the goals, good run...quiet 2nd half

Iffys formation was weird today, I can understand the back 5 and the 2 up front but I thought it was highly stupid to face Rotherham with only 7 players. I know P.Smith and CCP are injured, but why not bother with midfield at all :evil:


you're pissed up.
talking toilet pal,agree about smith and nicholas.
ifil man of the match :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


Title: Re: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: DV on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 20:11:40
Quote from: "arriba"
Quote from: "DV85"
Evans - 5 - Two good saves in the first half, shocking attempt for the 3rd goal

Smith - 4 - Not solid at all

O'Hanlon - 4 - At fault for the 2nd goal run ragged all game

Ifil - 5 - Probably our best player, some good tackles but overran

Nicholas - 4 - Offered alot going forward, looked suspect at the back

Peacock - 5 - Worked hard, at fault for 2nd goal

Cureton - 4 - Good finish for the goals, good run...quiet 2nd half

Iffys formation was weird today, I can understand the back 5 and the 2 up front but I thought it was highly stupid to face Rotherham with only 7 players. I know P.Smith and CCP are injured, but why not bother with midfield at all :evil:


you're pissed up.
talking toilet pal,agree about smith and nicholas.
ifil man of the match :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


You hate Ifil and everything he does anyway.....so what does it matter. Plus I never actually said he was man of the match


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: dogs on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 20:13:48
An absolutely disgusting performance. It was always on the cards with the useless muppet Gurney in midfield.

Evans 5
Nicholas 4
Smith 5
O'Hanlon 6
Ifil 4
Brown 4
Gurney 1
Miglioranzi 1
Shakes 2
Cureton 6
Peacock 7

Jarett 5
Pook 3
Roberts 5


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: ST_INC on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 21:05:58
Quote

An absolutely disgusting performance. It was always on the cards with the useless muppet Gurney in midfield.

Evans 5
Nicholas 4
Smith 5
O'Hanlon 6
Ifil 4
Brown 4
Gurney 1
Miglioranzi 1
Shakes 2
Cureton 6
Peacock 7

Jarett 5
Pook 3
Roberts 5




Agreed. A bit generous with Gurney though


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: Asher on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 21:24:24
Fuck it, its over now! Time to forgetm, get our chins up and ALL get behind the lads at forest.

Finished forget it


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: Piemonte on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 21:28:13
I cant be bothered to rate them. they were all cunts today.:wanker:  

Rotherham wanted it more and got the 3 points they deserved. fair play to them and the fans who gave them cracking support despite limited numbers.

The thing that annoyed me most was actually pook when he came on.

He's 20 and has been brought on for the last 20 mins and he didnt even run around!  :evil:  didnt look fit or interested at all.  

Roberts needs to play some reserve games too, he's been shite in both games since he's been back. I desperatly want him to do well, but theres no point in him being in the 1st team squad when so clearly unfit.


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: adje on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 21:33:45
Dont like to say I told you so-but I told you Gurney coming back was a HUGE HUGE mistake-he's a fucking waste of space


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: Piemonte on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 21:38:09
Quote from: "adje"
Dont like to say I told you so-but I told you Gurney coming back was a HUGE HUGE mistake-he's a fucking waste of space


based on the last 3 games I've him seen him play, I'd have to agree with you .

today especially he was shit.


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 21:39:41
Gurney was SHIT!


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: DMR on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 21:46:57
Thought Ifil was our best player.

Nicholas, Migs and Gurney were horrendous.


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: Piemonte on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 21:53:55
I thought the cock was our best player, based on effort.


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: dogs on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 22:07:25
adje I agree totally and like you i've never rated him.


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: Reeves for King on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 22:12:18
I have only just recovered from my rage about how shite we were today. I have no idea where we got two goals from and have come to the conclusion that Rotherham's defence was marginally less bad than ours.

I cannot believe we lost to Rotherham, and at home as well. These are games we must win if we are to stay up.

All our players were shit, no-one played well, Rhys was in line for my man of the match until he decided to forfeit the game. Apart from that you could argue it was my best friend Ifil, but doesn't stretch much further than that.

We were so shite today and deserved to get hammered, let alone nearly come back to parity.


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: reeves4england on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 22:13:17
Three days ago people said we were heading for the play-offs and I told them not to get acrried away. Now I'm just sat here waiting to read a post saying we are screwed and bound to be relegated.

I'm sure it won't be long


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: Reeves for King on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 22:20:37
We're screwed and bound to be relegated.



Fucking pessimists.


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: richiestfc on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 22:47:59
Quote from: "Rich"
Gurney was SHIT!


there is sence out there!well said rich i totally agree and have done ever since he's been here 8)


Title: Ratings Vs Rotherham
Post by: Johno on Saturday, February 18, 2006, 23:02:22
Smith really got on my nerves today...

his tackling was awful, didn't move forward, didn't look bothered. dunno why smith im annoyed with most, just am.