Pages: 1 ... 630 631 632 [633] 634 635 636 ... 861   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: New beginnings - 25% Truth, 80% Bollocks  (Read 1266651 times)
Bennett
No Comment

Offline Offline

Posts: 9514





Ignore
« Reply #9480 on: Friday, December 15, 2023, 13:52:35 »

The trust's september statement when the shareholding issues came to light says:

"An example of this is Friday’s agreement to allow a representative from the Trust Board to review the financial records and accounts of the Club, something which goes above that previously agreed and probably unheard of at other Clubs"

https://truststfc.com/2023/09/19/share-transfer-and-ownership-statement/

Which has changed to "clear analysis" to be shared by December.
Logged

This is the water.
And this is the well.
Drink full and descend.
The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
ChalkyWhiteIsGod
TOLD YOU SO

Offline Offline

Posts: 6465





Ignore
« Reply #9481 on: Friday, December 15, 2023, 14:26:49 »

Could it simply be his ego? He's always banged the drum of owning the club 100% and maybe he didn't want to lose face by admitting he had to seek alternative investment. Whatever the actual reason, it was a pretty dumb way of going about it, especially given the open and transparent rhetoric that's basically now shattered.

Definitely more to it. Remember when someone asked about Chris Kiely and the most we could get was "uuuuuuhhhhh, he gives us good data". Wouldn't surprise me if Adam Hart is involved.
Logged
RobertT

Offline Offline

Posts: 11739




Ignore
« Reply #9482 on: Friday, December 15, 2023, 14:39:44 »

If you simply apply basic logic, a fairly reasonable explanation can be found for why this all happened the way it did.

1) The potential sale of the CG and signing of a 298 year lease was coming to a head
2) That would involve the club receiving a sizeable asset
3) Power has purchased the Debentures from Black/Arbib
4) The Debentures were secured against any and all assets of the business - it was about to get one
5) Power knows the Debentures are about to have some real value and calls them in
6) Clem knows he has two options - a) pay Power and get his hands on 50% of the ground for FREE, or b) walk away from the deal and let the Trust/Eady take the ground in it's entirety, but Power likely walks away for the time being given the club has no assets to call in.
7) Clem decides the value of the ground is greater and finds a quick way to grab the cash to settle the debt, but is also well aware that if he transfers shares he'd need to tell the EFL and Trust/Eady (the former because of regulations, the latter because the deal on the ground demands it).
8 ) Clem decides to proceed but needs to keep it quiet for as long as possible, to ensure the deal for the ground proceeds smoothly

I reckon he part hoped, like he tried to do with Zav being appointed as Vice Chair, that everyone would just stop paying attention.

At all times, in this scenario, Clem has choices, it is not forced upon him.  Everything he did was calculated based on the risks and potential outcomes.  

His method of operating, possibly from the industry he works within, is nearly always the 'dodgy" route.  Lots of nods and winks, not least his original investment into the club.  It's why Power would have done business with him in the first place.  I mean, look back to his first days - the idea to pressure people to not ask for refunds on season tickets.  Who comes up with an idea like that?  The sort of person who has a very malleable moral compass when it comes to business.
« Last Edit: Friday, December 15, 2023, 14:44:47 by RobertT » Logged
Mooneyraker

Offline Offline

Posts: 2859


Beware Aussies in bucket hats bearing gifts




Ignore
« Reply #9483 on: Friday, December 15, 2023, 14:43:42 »

If you simply apply basic logic, a fairly reasonable explanation can be found for why this all happened the way it did.

1) The potential sale of the CG and signing of a 298 year lease was coming to a head
2) That would involve the club receiving a sizeable asset
3) Power has purchased the Debentures from Black/Arbib
4) The Debentures were secured against any and all assets of the business - it was about to get one
5) Power knows the Debentures are about to have some real value and calls them in
6) Clem knows he has two options - a) pay Power and get his hands on 50% of the ground for FREE, or b) walk away from the deal and let the Trust/Eady take the ground in it's entirety, but Power likely walks away for the time being given the club has no assets to call in.
7) Clem decides the value of the ground is greater and finds a quick way to grab the cash to settle the debt, but is also well aware that if he transfers shares he'd need to tell the EFL and Trust/Eady (the former because of regulations, the latter because the deal on the ground demands it).
8 ) Clem decides to proceed but needs to keep it quiet for as long as possible, to ensure the deal for the ground proceeds smoothly

I reckon he part hoped, like he tried to do with Zav being appointed as Vice Chair, that everyone would just stop paying attention.

At all times, in this scenario, Clem has choices, it is not forced upon him.  Everything he did was calculated based on the risks and potential outcomes.  

His method of operating, possibly from the industry he works within, is nearly always the 'dodgy" route.  Lots of nods and winks, not least his original investment into the club.  It's why Power would have done business with him in the first place.

Good summary. Most plausible.

Which makes you wonder why the Eady Trust/Council/Trust haven't kicked up a stink. Or perhaps they have.

Either way, you get the Poirot nod for today.

Logged
RobertT

Offline Offline

Posts: 11739




Ignore
« Reply #9484 on: Friday, December 15, 2023, 14:48:08 »

The Trust/Eady probably have had words, but the agreement is not really enforceable in any way, not financially or legally any way.  They can only enforce/prevent the sale of the asset itself, not the ownership of shares of the business that owns the asset.  STFC Ltd must own the ground and lease, but anyone can own STFC Ltd.
Logged
Mooneyraker

Offline Offline

Posts: 2859


Beware Aussies in bucket hats bearing gifts




Ignore
« Reply #9485 on: Friday, December 15, 2023, 14:52:15 »

The Trust/Eady probably have had words, but the agreement is not really enforceable in any way, not financially or legally any way.  They can only enforce/prevent the sale of the asset itself, not the ownership of shares of the business that owns the asset.  STFC Ltd must own the ground and lease, but anyone can own STFC Ltd.

If they had included a clause that said "I hereby confirm I am the 100% owner of STFC" could the agreement have been voided if it turned out he had lied?

Not my area of expertise.
Logged
The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey

Offline Offline

Posts: 19419


?Absolute Calamity!?




Ignore
« Reply #9486 on: Friday, December 15, 2023, 14:56:32 »

You’d hope that due diligence had been done before handing 50% of the CG to Clem. Surely the Trust, via the JV, hold the trump card of stalling on anything to do with the CG that may make Clem a fast buck,
Logged
RobertT

Offline Offline

Posts: 11739




Ignore
« Reply #9487 on: Friday, December 15, 2023, 15:03:54 »

You’d hope that due diligence had been done before handing 50% of the CG to Clem. Surely the Trust, via the JV, hold the trump card of stalling on anything to do with the CG that may make Clem a fast buck,

I believe it went back and forth between lawyers for both sides, at least that is the impression the Trust gave before the deal was signed.  It's tough to word something in a way that covers every eventuality without creating a situation where the other party walks away.  I think they landed on STFC Ltd being the owners, as a legal entity.  That legal entity is almost certainly precluded from selling the ground without gaining a majority decision to approve from the JV board.  What they did not do, and likely found they were unable to do, is have such a measure in place around the ownership of shares in STFC Ltd.  A good solicitor for the club would argue that places restrictions on the business which would simply become too onerous.  If the club needed to seek investment to cover a shortfall in Opex for example, it could be prevented from doing so through equity disbursements.  A valid course of action for a business to operate.
Logged
The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey

Offline Offline

Posts: 19419


?Absolute Calamity!?




Ignore
« Reply #9488 on: Friday, December 15, 2023, 15:16:55 »

Flynn

‘ This has been ongoing and is nothing new. We have been aware of the possible sanctions for a while, so that has been dealt with. I don't think it will hamper the budget. There was talk about a points deduction, I have never heard of that. That is putting two and two together and getting five.

We are better as a club and as a team when we stick together. We all get frustrated at different things, but when they are behind me it gives me a stronger belief that we can do something. I do think that off the pitch, the club are getting through a lot of the things that they have to get through.’
Logged
Power to people

Offline Offline

Posts: 6417





Ignore
« Reply #9489 on: Friday, December 15, 2023, 16:30:32 »

Flynn

‘ This has been ongoing and is nothing new. We have been aware of the possible sanctions for a while, so that has been dealt with. I don't think it will hamper the budget. There was talk about a points deduction, I have never heard of that. That is putting two and two together and getting five.

We are better as a club and as a team when we stick together. We all get frustrated at different things, but when they are behind me it gives me a stronger belief that we can do something. I do think that off the pitch, the club are getting through a lot of the things that they have to get through.’

I think Flynn needs to be concerned with on field matters and leave the off field for those upstairs, he don't want to be getting involved there - I can see why he comments but equally it is not his area to comment

As for not affecting his budget, he doesn't know the size of the fine yet, we may need need to sell a player to pay it - although, it is never said how long the FL gives clubs to pay
Logged
Batch
Not a Batch

Offline Offline

Posts: 55432





Ignore
« Reply #9490 on: Friday, December 15, 2023, 16:40:47 »

He was probably just asking a direct question tbf
Logged
Jimmy HaveHave

Offline Offline

Posts: 15268





Ignore
« Reply #9491 on: Friday, December 15, 2023, 19:12:53 »

Saw this Kings Lynn F.C expenses sheet love to see a STFC one😁
Logged

So, give no fucks
tans
You spin me right round baby right round

Offline Offline

Posts: 25119





Ignore
« Reply #9492 on: Friday, December 15, 2023, 19:15:07 »

Saw this Kings Lynn F.C expenses sheet love to see a STFC one😁

Banbury took 10 fans and it was still segregated
Logged
Jimmy HaveHave

Offline Offline

Posts: 15268





Ignore
« Reply #9493 on: Friday, December 15, 2023, 19:19:51 »

Banbury took 10 fans and it was still segregated


 Clap Clap
Logged

So, give no fucks
ChalkyWhiteIsGod
TOLD YOU SO

Offline Offline

Posts: 6465





Ignore
« Reply #9494 on: Friday, December 15, 2023, 19:33:18 »

This just in Linda Adams on facebook says if you get Clem out, there won't be a club. Why haven't I offered a few million to invest in the club if I know it all. Also, she hopes Clem takes the trolls to court.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 630 631 632 [633] 634 635 636 ... 861   Go Up
Print
Jump to: