Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
 Offline
Posts: 15863
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Thursday, October 27, 2005, 12:39:33 » |
|
ok thanks ill read up now
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Thursday, October 27, 2005, 12:44:51 » |
|
doesn't sound like it's going to happen though im afraid
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Danjackson10
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Thursday, October 27, 2005, 18:18:49 » |
|
Nope i think we can give up on smithy!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Thursday, October 27, 2005, 20:12:48 » |
|
Forte looks like a move Iffy is persuing. he's a striker. what are everyones thoughts on this? (apolgies if this has been done in another thread before)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Kinky Tom
Snow Master Sandwich King.
Offline
Posts: 8887
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Thursday, October 27, 2005, 20:15:10 » |
|
From Donny? Lightening quick!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Thursday, October 27, 2005, 20:16:30 » |
|
yeah thats the one! scored against us this year. should be a good singing if it happens.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mattboyslim
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Friday, October 28, 2005, 08:08:20 » |
|
My fear is we'll run out of loans then get loads of injuries/suspensions in the run in and be buggared.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Friday, October 28, 2005, 11:01:58 » |
|
how many loans deals can one team have in a year!? cause we can't just waste them as there limited aren't they?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32301
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Friday, October 28, 2005, 11:05:03 » |
|
forte makes ifil look slow...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dazzza
Offline
Posts: 8265
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Friday, October 28, 2005, 11:19:10 » |
|
We have two short term loans left (up to 3 months) for the season.
However we still have a full quota of long-term loans we can use. I believe the restriction is still a max of four per season (?) and the player has to be under 24 (?).
Iffy has until Dec 31 to decide which four, if any he wants to keep.
Anyone got the updated loan rules for 05/06, would like to take a look?
Smith if I'm right wouldn't be eligible for a long-term loan due to his age, which would mean he’d have to come here short-term for a max of three months leaving just one short term loan left.
The four that I’d like to see stay are….
Heaton
Boozer
Possibly McDermott
Ship the rest back.
I’d keep Gurney but again if I’m right above then unless he signs permanently then it’s on short term loan again and a bit of a waste what with having Jenks already in the left back position. If he did sign permanently at least it would allow us to re-use his loan allocation again.
Get Holmes back that’s what I say.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mister Lorenzo
Dirk Diggler
Offline
Posts: 238
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Friday, October 28, 2005, 11:57:12 » |
|
Just seen on the BBC website that Paul Smith has re-joined Gillingham on loan until December.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Friday, October 28, 2005, 11:58:13 » |
|
it was a always a long shot though wasn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
