i think i'm right in saying that if his next contract is less per week than his current contract, then we'd have to pay the difference. gulp!
what makes you say that?
he's got near enough 2 years left to run, so if he does leave we'll have to pay him up a fair amount. Just like we did King, Bill?
it's because he isn't requesting a transfer, but we're moving him on. his contract with us says that he's entitled to earn, say, £2'000 for the duration of that contract, and we'd have to make sure that he does.
i might be wrong though, hope i am!