Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
 Offline
Posts: 34913
|
 |
« on: Friday, April 15, 2005, 07:53:31 » |
|
......looks likely they want a donkey CH.....its easy to see why and as Heywood is out of contract he will be free and they can raise his wage.
I wont be too sorry to see him go.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
McLovin
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Friday, April 15, 2005, 08:26:11 » |
|
Where did you hear this, Reg?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Asher
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Friday, April 15, 2005, 08:30:45 » |
|
Ive always rated Heywood big central defender and better than ifil
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Marie
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Friday, April 15, 2005, 10:09:28 » |
|
Think we'd be better off without him.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
McLovin
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Friday, April 15, 2005, 10:15:14 » |
|
I don't think we'd be better off without him, but he might be easily replaced. I still think he and O'Hanlon can do a job in this division.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
blinkpip
His Infernal Majesty
Offline
Posts: 6741
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Friday, April 15, 2005, 10:38:24 » |
|
It says it on here. http://www.thisisstfc.co.uk/News_Headlines_Story.asp?NewsID=4258Matt Hewlett was offered a contract. :shock: bloody money grabbing twat. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ee the trick is only pick on those that can't do you no harm
Like the drummer from Def Leppard's only got one arm
I annoyed Yeovilred 28/01/06
|
|
|
Panda Paws
Offline
Posts: 2170
Arse
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Friday, April 15, 2005, 11:18:05 » |
|
My trouble with Heywood has never been his ability to win the ball at the back - it's what he does afterwards. He's one of the worst offenders for spanking the ball up - usually with cries of 'hoooooooooof' from the crowd.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dazzza
Offline
Posts: 8265
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Friday, April 15, 2005, 11:26:20 » |
|
I'll be very sorry to see Matty Heywood go. Technically not always the best but a solid enough sturdy centre half for this level.
I guarantee that Hewlett was not offered a contract and todays story is the reason he kept it quiet. Gives him an element of bargaining power when he looks for a new club, it sounds so much better when you have turned down a contract rather having been released on a free.
That said a wholesale clearout may be just the ticket.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Piemonte
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Friday, April 15, 2005, 12:22:08 » |
|
Heywoods not a bad player and I could see why city would want him or someone of his ilk.
They've been weak in the air at the back for a while now, Henderson tore them apart at trashton gate. That said he was being marked by 5 foot 9 Matt Hill who they've since sold.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Friday, April 15, 2005, 12:35:26 » |
|
I'd be sad to see Heywood go, especially as he's just got back to full fitness and returned to form. I think we'd miss him, but wouldn't be terribly difficult to replace.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
adje
Offline
Posts: 13679
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Friday, April 15, 2005, 14:38:05 » |
|
Ifil,although not great this season,has the potential to be a better CH than Heywood-his distribution is somewhat better and he does have pace.A decent coach could do something with him.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
quot;Molten memories splashing down
upon the rooves of Swindon Town"
|
|
|
|
Piemonte
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Friday, April 15, 2005, 15:00:30 » |
|
Ifills distribution better?  ?? At least Heywood's hoofs stay in play (sometimes  ) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Friday, April 15, 2005, 15:06:06 » |
|
doubt it. king will give him a contract i bet. Heywood doesn't seem like someone who is on alot of money anyway. don't why, just doesn't...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
adje
Offline
Posts: 13679
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Friday, April 15, 2005, 15:17:36 » |
|
Ifills distribution better? ?? At least Heywood's hoofs stay in play (sometimes ) I did say "somewhat"i.e. he finds a player sometimes,unlike The Hoof! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
quot;Molten memories splashing down
upon the rooves of Swindon Town"
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 15997
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Friday, April 15, 2005, 15:32:34 » |
|
I think Heywood is an important player, and although some areas of his game need to be improved (distribution and awareness), at times he can be solid as a rock, like he was vs City.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
