jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
 Offline
Posts: 12532
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: Wednesday, March 11, 2015, 11:12:39 » |
|
I tweeted him this and he didn't reply after he'd been replying to a few other people's ideas of what it was.
 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JayBox325
Offline
Posts: 1546
|
|
« Reply #46 on: Wednesday, March 11, 2015, 12:02:48 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RedLadyBucks
Offline
Posts: 75
|
|
« Reply #47 on: Wednesday, March 11, 2015, 12:13:00 » |
|
Successfully appealed a PCN in Colbourne St.
We got one there the other week, didn't realise the bit right at the end was residents only. what grounds did you use to win the appeal?? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Gnasher
Offline
Posts: 5204
Prefers animals to people (in a non sexual way)
|
|
« Reply #48 on: Wednesday, March 11, 2015, 12:41:52 » |
|
John Inverdale slip of the tongue.
 Coloured + Tinted = Cunted |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Cats are better than dogs FACT
|
|
|
Red and Proud
Offline
Posts: 531
|
|
« Reply #49 on: Wednesday, March 11, 2015, 18:55:55 » |
|
We got one there the other week, didn't realise the bit right at the end was residents only. what grounds did you use to win the appeal??
There are no signs which support that end of Colbourne street being residents parking after the disrpution of double yellow lines on both sides. Plus there is an additional sign half way Down Colbourne St on the left indicating that that portion is RP. Again there is nothing supporting the two sides at the County Road end, where there was restricted parking signs previous but they have been removed. I pointed out this with photo evidence and a stinging rebuke that I reckon I could find many examples of residents parking where each section was supported with a specific sign indicating this. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: Wednesday, March 11, 2015, 19:00:15 by Red and Proud »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
@mwooly63
Offline
Posts: 3377
|
|
« Reply #50 on: Tuesday, March 17, 2015, 14:29:14 » |
|
82ers announce a £9.2 million loss up to May 2014.
On top of the previous years loss of £11.5 million
FFP anyone ??
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: Tuesday, March 17, 2015, 15:27:23 by @mwooly63 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
kerry red
|
|
« Reply #51 on: Tuesday, March 17, 2015, 14:50:58 » |
|
No doubt the 82ers will put a gloss on it.
If Lansdowne hadn't written off another £35m they'd be right up shit creek.
I presume that being in the Championship will involve an upturn in debt.
I'm sure I read recently that QPR had a load of debt written off but the authorities now disregard that when it comes to deciding if FFP rules have been breached.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
|
« Reply #52 on: Tuesday, March 17, 2015, 15:23:27 » |
|
No doubt the 82ers will put a gloss on it.
Yes, at least it's less than the previous year's loss !! I'm sure that they have lost around £50m in the last 4 years |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
|
« Reply #53 on: Tuesday, March 17, 2015, 15:31:52 » |
|
Here's the losses by The 82ers from 2008 :
2008 £2m
2009 £6.5m
2010 £11.8m
2011 £11.45m
2012 £14.4m
2013 £12.9m
2014 £9.2m
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
@mwooly63
Offline
Posts: 3377
|
|
« Reply #54 on: Tuesday, March 17, 2015, 15:33:40 » |
|
Am sure this seasons loss will be right up there too. Big expensive squad and reduced capacity at trashton Tho with FFPs lax use in leagues one and two I doubt they will get any embargoes until the go up http://www.financialfairplay.co.uk/scmp.php |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
kerry red
|
|
« Reply #55 on: Tuesday, March 17, 2015, 15:42:53 » |
|
So, QPR in reverse then - they don't get butt-fucked until they come down.
In some, ways I don't agree with limiting a wealthy owner bankrolling a club.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #56 on: Tuesday, March 17, 2015, 15:45:04 » |
|
No doubt the 82ers will put a gloss on it.
Of course they will....just close the club down, don't honour any existing debts, football or otherwise related and give the new club a catchy new name....like Bristol City (2017 Ltd). |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
tans
You spin me right round baby right round
 Online
Posts: 25112
|
|
« Reply #57 on: Tuesday, March 17, 2015, 15:58:40 » |
|
Cheating fuckers
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
|
« Reply #58 on: Tuesday, March 17, 2015, 16:01:12 » |
|
Am sure this seasons loss will be right up there too.
Big expensive squad and reduced capacity at trashton
Most of the stadium costs will be capitalised, but they will need the money from Lansdown to pay for them. They will have to pay out more win bonuses, probably promotion bonuses, and if they win the JPT, bonuses for that in a smaller capacity stadium. Could be even bigger losses this season as well? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JayBox325
Offline
Posts: 1546
|
|
« Reply #59 on: Tuesday, March 17, 2015, 16:04:54 » |
|
Most of the stadium costs will be capitalised, but they will need the money from Lansdown to pay for them.
They will have to pay out more win bonuses, probably promotion bonuses, and if they win the JPT, bonuses for that in a smaller capacity stadium.
Could be even bigger losses this season as well?
*cough*bought-the-title*cough* |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
