Whits
Morphined Up
 Offline
Posts: 8136
|
 |
« on: Sunday, June 25, 2006, 22:05:33 » |
|
is it an offensive word?
i will explain why later
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Plays in midfield and his name is Tommy Miller,
signed him from Huddersfield his name is Tommy Miller,
first touch is average but his second is a killer,
heeeeeey Tommy Miller!
|
|
|
Sade
Offline
Posts: 6427
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Monday, June 26, 2006, 14:33:09 » |
|
I voted No.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
RED ARMY
|
|
|
Bedford Red
Offline
Posts: 4548
Smithers Jones
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Monday, June 26, 2006, 15:20:09 » |
|
I voted no too; as have most people.
Looking forward to the explanation Whits.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
my-velocity
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Monday, June 26, 2006, 16:41:24 » |
|
I voted no too.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16352
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Monday, June 26, 2006, 16:45:09 » |
|
i voted yes if anyone cares?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
Whits
Morphined Up
Offline
Posts: 8136
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Monday, June 26, 2006, 19:30:46 » |
|
interesting that 3 people said it was. I went into the club on saturday to get a shirt for a lady friend from canada, the lady doing the shirt printing refused to print xplicit (long story  ) saying it was offensive, after a bit of debate she still refused and i left the shop. now i understand if something is rude then it is (e)xplicit but the word it self to me isn't offensive, just wondered what everyone else thought |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Plays in midfield and his name is Tommy Miller,
signed him from Huddersfield his name is Tommy Miller,
first touch is average but his second is a killer,
heeeeeey Tommy Miller!
|
|
|
Sippo
Living in the 80s
Offline
Posts: 15585
I ain't gettin on no plane fool
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Monday, June 26, 2006, 19:36:34 » |
|
Its not a swear word and is probably a personal joke. where's the problem?!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're gonna see some serious shit...
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 15990
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Monday, June 26, 2006, 20:59:34 » |
|
How can it be offensive?! Try again when somebody different is working and you should be fine!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFCBird
Ralphy's Wet Dream
Offline
Posts: 10673
C U Next Tuesday!
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Monday, June 26, 2006, 21:13:19 » |
|
whits you could ask my mate to do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
flossyleadxx
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Monday, June 26, 2006, 22:28:50 » |
|
Shhhhhh Birdy!!! i wonder who you could be thinking of, but i cant think why she said no.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yeo
Offline
Posts: 3651
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Monday, June 26, 2006, 22:31:31 » |
|
I voted yes because everyone else had said no.
Obviously there is nothing wrong with it really.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
/
W56196272
|
|
|
|
McLovin
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Tuesday, June 27, 2006, 09:49:45 » |
|
Explicit just means detailed, i thought
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 11717
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday, June 27, 2006, 10:07:03 » |
|
So basically the club refused to sell you something on the basis that they felt it looked like a word they felt was offensive?!!!
Apart from thr word having no offensive meaning at all, if this was the standard used for the use of names on clothes, FCUK would have been banned a long time ago.
Surely they have little freedom to stop many words being printed if you ask for them?
Isn't it about time some "normal" people got employed at the club?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
land_of_bo
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday, June 27, 2006, 10:51:51 » |
|
Perhaps they had no "X"'s and were embarresed?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
