Lethbridge70
Offline
Posts: 30
|
|
« Reply #1890 on: Wednesday, May 26, 2021, 08:58:35 » |
|
Mcgreal was the appointment we should have made when Wellens left.Plays the style of football that would have suited our squad.Its not like he wasn't available.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Panda Paws
|
|
« Reply #1891 on: Wednesday, May 26, 2021, 08:58:55 » |
|
I think more a case of 2+2=4. Nixon reported it, massive odds on favourite, betting now suspended....
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Flashheart
|
|
« Reply #1892 on: Wednesday, May 26, 2021, 09:05:07 » |
|
Reasonably happy with this. (If true).
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Abrahammer
Offline
Posts: 4823
A legitimate dude sighting
|
|
« Reply #1893 on: Wednesday, May 26, 2021, 09:15:24 » |
|
I’ll take this under the circumstances, could have done far far worse
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 55422
|
|
« Reply #1894 on: Wednesday, May 26, 2021, 09:38:38 » |
|
I’ll take this under the circumstances, could have done far far worse
Key bit is in bold. It does lead to the question if Axis get control will they retain....but that's a million miles away and we can't wait.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Flashheart
|
|
« Reply #1895 on: Wednesday, May 26, 2021, 09:44:29 » |
|
I think it looks like a reasonable appointment even if we were not currently a basket case.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Panda Paws
|
|
« Reply #1896 on: Wednesday, May 26, 2021, 09:46:44 » |
|
Mcgreal was the appointment we should have made when Wellens left.Plays the style of football that would have suited our squad.Its not like he wasn't available.
100%
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jimmy HaveHave
Offline
Posts: 15268
|
|
« Reply #1897 on: Wednesday, May 26, 2021, 09:48:02 » |
|
Mcgreal was the appointment we should have made when Wellens left.Plays the style of football that would have suited our squad.Its not like he wasn't available.
Agreed but probably not the cheap option at the time
|
|
|
Logged
|
So, give no fucks
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32331
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #1898 on: Wednesday, May 26, 2021, 10:59:01 » |
|
He’s used to managing nondescript, insignificant teams who just make up the numbers.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Flashheart
|
|
« Reply #1899 on: Wednesday, May 26, 2021, 11:01:38 » |
|
He’s used to managing nondescript, insignificant teams who just make up the numbers.
McGreal? He's managed 1 (one) team.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nemo
Shit Bacon
Offline
Posts: 21398
|
|
« Reply #1900 on: Wednesday, May 26, 2021, 11:04:21 » |
|
He’s used to managing nondescript, insignificant teams who just make up the numbers.
Sounds like progress to me...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32331
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #1901 on: Wednesday, May 26, 2021, 11:08:34 » |
|
McGreal?
He's managed 1 (one) team.
I know that. Are Colchester not as I described? Are we not the same as that?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jimmy HaveHave
Offline
Posts: 15268
|
|
« Reply #1902 on: Wednesday, May 26, 2021, 11:09:41 » |
|
Four years at Colchester so he would have managed different teams in that period.
|
|
|
Logged
|
So, give no fucks
|
|
|
Flashheart
|
|
« Reply #1903 on: Wednesday, May 26, 2021, 11:18:56 » |
|
I know that. Are Colchester not as I described?
Yes. But you make it out as though he has a long history with a reputation of managing that kind of team only. (You even used the plural).
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 55422
|
|
« Reply #1904 on: Wednesday, May 26, 2021, 11:20:51 » |
|
He’s used to managing nondescript, insignificant teams who just make up the numbers.
McGreal? He's managed 1 (one) team. 100% loss record at Colchester the first time
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|