|
SwindonTownFC
|
 |
« Reply #150 on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 12:17:02 » |
|
we did not pay for Sean O'Hanlon....I'm certain.... no we didnt, he was going to be part of the Leigh Mills deal but he opted for spurs and the 150k spurs paid for Mills seems to have to stuck with the O'Hanlon story |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dazzza
 Offline
Posts: 8265
|
|
« Reply #151 on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 13:04:33 » |
|
It was an undisclosed fee if I remember rightly with mention of sell-on clauses.
I'm sure rumours at the time pointed to around the 50k mark?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SwindonTownFC
|
|
« Reply #152 on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 13:27:06 » |
|
It was an undisclosed fee if I remember rightly with mention of sell-on clauses.
I'm sure rumours at the time pointed to around the 50k mark? it was a free transfer |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sonic youth
|
|
« Reply #153 on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 13:28:39 » |
|
I just think Franchise feels like a big club in disguise and capable of doing a Swansea' if you like. har har. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #154 on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 16:57:58 » |
|
doing a swansea, go up and lose in a play off final...ha.
well, o hanlon was okay, didn't always play to the standards we knew he could.
im sure he left cause of the arrival of williams...maybe didn't want to compete with ifil and had the chance of definite first team football at mk.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dazzza
Offline
Posts: 8265
|
|
« Reply #155 on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 18:54:23 » |
|
For what it’s worth it was definitely an undisclosed fee. Everton have it officially quoted as such and the Adver piece from the time reported that an actual deal was struck for the move with Moyes with no mention of a free transfer.
The only mention of a free transfer cam a month before when the Mills deal was still on but remained undisclosed. If you scan through the Adver archives a “mystery hitch”, which turned out to be Spurs, prevented the free transfer going through. The loan deal was extended - presumably for a fee to be agreed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SwindonTownFC
|
|
« Reply #156 on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 18:56:46 » |
|
For what it’s worth it was definitely an undisclosed fee. Everton have it officially quoted as such and the Adver piece from the time reported that an actual deal was struck for the move with Moyes with no mention of a free transfer.
The only mention of a free transfer cam a month before when the Mills deal was still on but remained undisclosed. If you scan through the Adver archives a “mystery hitch”, which turned out to be Spurs, prevented the free transfer going through. The loan deal was extended - presumably for a fee to be agreed. :old: :old: |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dazzza
Offline
Posts: 8265
|
|
« Reply #157 on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 18:58:31 » |
|
It was fucking bugging the hell out of me alright?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SwindonTownFC
|
|
« Reply #158 on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 19:01:47 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ben Wah Balls
Offline
Posts: 5972
|
|
« Reply #160 on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 22:46:11 » |
|
O'Hanlon was definitely free. The £150k was indeed what we would have got for Leigh Mills had Everton signed him.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
lebowski
|
|
« Reply #161 on: Wednesday, July 5, 2006, 08:20:10 » |
|
all we paid for o'hanlon was £500 to his agent.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
