|
Title: Soton v Pompey Post by: Boeta on Saturday, January 29, 2005, 13:44:31 Penalty or not?
I'm inclined to say it was. Title: Soton v Pompey Post by: Whits on Saturday, January 29, 2005, 13:47:35 close call, he was always going to go down, in that position
Title: Soton v Pompey Post by: Boeta on Saturday, January 29, 2005, 13:50:38 Lundekvam came at pace and clattered him even though there wasn't actually a trip. Like you say a close call.
Portsmouth's new keeper is looking extremely dodgy. Title: Soton v Pompey Post by: Whits on Saturday, January 29, 2005, 14:00:35 camera is off!! deliberate handball, what a tit!!
Title: Soton v Pompey Post by: timmyg on Saturday, January 29, 2005, 14:05:51 I'm so happy he got sent off for that. I HATE it when players fall over and try to grab the ball. The bloody Italians do it all the time and I'm sick of it.A deliberate handball is at the very least a yellow card and in some cases a red, and I really wish that refs would start to book people for doing it.
The next person to do it should be sent off. And then have his arms cut off. To be made an example of. Title: Soton v Pompey Post by: Whits on Saturday, January 29, 2005, 14:07:47 Quote from: "timmyg" The next person to do it should be sent off. I totally agree Quote from: "timmyg" And then have his arms cut off. To be made an example of. i don't so much agree but i know how you feel! :D Title: Soton v Pompey Post by: Boeta on Saturday, January 29, 2005, 14:21:36 And the second one?
Was for me. Title: Soton v Pompey Post by: Whits on Saturday, January 29, 2005, 14:29:32 the analysis said it wasn't a penalty, if it wasn't given they would have though it was a penalty.
Title: Soton v Pompey Post by: Whits on Saturday, January 29, 2005, 14:30:00 but i thought it was a penalty
Title: Soton v Pompey Post by: timmyg on Saturday, January 29, 2005, 16:18:51 Aye, 'twas for me.
The commentators here thought it was the most blatant handball they'd ever seen... Wierdos. Title: Soton v Pompey Post by: Johno on Saturday, January 29, 2005, 18:54:54 the intent was there, had to be a penalty.
Title: Soton v Pompey Post by: DMR on Saturday, January 29, 2005, 20:40:04 Niether was a penalty in my opinion.
Because Kamara wasn't fouled and it hit Taylors chest. If you can conclude that either of those were legitimate penalties then you're nuts. Title: Soton v Pompey Post by: Tails on Saturday, January 29, 2005, 21:33:15 First one was Kamaras pace and he there was contact.
It hit Taylor's chest, I feel sorry for him. Davenport should have been off aswell, Ifil and Hendrie got sent off for it why should he get away with it? Title: Soton v Pompey Post by: DMR on Saturday, January 29, 2005, 21:35:31 Hendrie, I take your point.
Ifil did actually nut Abott though Title: Soton v Pompey Post by: Boeta on Saturday, January 29, 2005, 23:19:32 1. Lundekvam clattered Kamara
2. I still haven't seen a replay that has conclusively shown it didn't hit Taylor's arm Both atouch harsh perhaps, but certainly not rough justice. Title: Soton v Pompey Post by: Whits on Sunday, January 30, 2005, 04:13:27 Quote from: "Tails" It hit Taylor's chest, I feel sorry for him. his arm was out, if his arm was by his side it would have been story. His arm being out shown the intent. penalty even if you feel sorry for him. Title: Soton v Pompey Post by: Simon Pieman on Sunday, January 30, 2005, 12:24:27 both were penalties. FACT
|