Arriba
 Offline
Posts: 21289
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Tuesday, February 19, 2013, 11:08:57 » |
|
The departing lot are filthy rich. Can't see the new lot being better and even if they are their agenda will not be for the benefit of stfc. It will be for them.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
tans
You spin me right round baby right round
Offline
Posts: 25069
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Tuesday, February 19, 2013, 11:09:35 » |
|
Is there 2 or 3 more?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
lambourn red
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Tuesday, February 19, 2013, 11:13:09 » |
|
No, you've got it wrong.
Jed fucked it up on purpose because he wanted to push Paolo out. FACT!
Mike Newells Barmy Army FACT someone on thisis said so it must be true |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lambourn red
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Tuesday, February 19, 2013, 11:49:15 » |
|
As long as the names are not Perry Deakin and Miller from the Port Vale fiasco |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
random_five
Offline
Posts: 537
Downton, Wiltshire
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Tuesday, February 19, 2013, 11:50:23 » |
|
As long as the names are not Perry Deakin and Miller from the Port Vale fiasco
I think they have both publicly been discounted. Deakin certainly has. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32300
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Tuesday, February 19, 2013, 11:51:07 » |
|
I'd strongly suggest if this new lot were the real deal the first two things to happen since their involvement wouldn't have been to sell Ritchie and let our manager walk away...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ahounsell
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Tuesday, February 19, 2013, 11:54:10 » |
|
I'd strongly suggest if this new lot were the real deal the first two things to happen since their involvement wouldn't have been to sell Ritchie and let our manager walk away...
Unfortunately this is spot on. Theres loads of supposition and conjecture around the takeover but the only unarguable facts are that we sold a player for a firesale price to grab some cash and the manager has walked. Its understandable that people want to believe the new owners will be as supportive of the club in cash terms as the previous ones, but the facts do not point in that direction. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Flashheart
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Tuesday, February 19, 2013, 11:56:03 » |
|
So how do you and DV know the new lot sold Ritchie when A Black has himself said that he was the one that did it?
How is this an unarguable fact?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter Venkman
We don't need no stinking badges.
Offline
Posts: 59400
Things can only get better
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Tuesday, February 19, 2013, 11:57:11 » |
|
I'd strongly suggest if this new lot were the real deal the first two things to happen since their involvement wouldn't have been to sell Ritchie and let our manager walk away...
Technically both of these happened while the club was still run by Andrew Black. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Only a fool does not know when to hold his tongue.
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Tuesday, February 19, 2013, 11:57:21 » |
|
how can the consortium sell a player registered to a club they do not even own?
how can the consortium keep hold of a manager employed by a club they do not even own?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Leggett
Do you like popsicles?
Offline
Posts: 7651
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Tuesday, February 19, 2013, 11:59:58 » |
|
these facts matter not to our dear VD, he loves a good conspiracy!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fuck you Leggett, fuck you.
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32300
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Tuesday, February 19, 2013, 12:00:26 » |
|
Hence why I said involvement rather ownership.
Lets not play silly buggers here, if the potential new owners were going to seriously invest in this club - they would have found a way around it, leaving Black and/or the club with other options.
People who want to invest don't let two of their best assists go, regardless of technicalities
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Flashheart
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Tuesday, February 19, 2013, 12:02:41 » |
|
Hence why I said involvement rather ownership.
Lets not play silly buggers here, if the potential new owners were going to seriously invest in this club - they would have found a way around it, leaving Black and/or the club with other options.
People who want to invest don't let two of their best assists go, regardless of technicalities
Sop you'd expect them to throw 400k into something that does not belong to them? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32300
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Tuesday, February 19, 2013, 12:03:00 » |
|
how can the consortium sell a player registered to a club they do not even own?
how can the consortium keep hold of a manager employed by a club they do not even own?
I never said they did, did I? They didn't exactly do much to stop it though or try and protect the asset they are trying to buy... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
