Pages: 1 ... 158 159 160 [161] 162 163 164 ... 629   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Coronavirus  (Read 1217154 times)
@mwooly63

Offline Offline

Posts: 3377





Ignore
« Reply #2400 on: Friday, April 10, 2020, 18:02:27 »

Did I hear right that the UK has 9000 infections today???

No was 5k plus
Logged
mexico red

Offline Offline

Posts: 11753


Demasiado no es demasiado




Ignore
« Reply #2401 on: Friday, April 10, 2020, 18:15:53 »

?


* 1D4C648D-80FD-42DA-B767-AC6DBBFC4F83.png (117.02 KB, 640x1136 - viewed 162 times.)
Logged
Quagmire

Offline Offline

Posts: 4629





Ignore
« Reply #2402 on: Friday, April 10, 2020, 18:36:32 »

That’s incorrect - 5706 it was.
Logged
Banker

Offline Offline

Posts: 187


On The Bank




Ignore
« Reply #2403 on: Friday, April 10, 2020, 18:49:27 »

UK Government: "Today’s figures for positive tests have been adjusted to include positive case results from swab testing for key workers and their households. "
Logged
Jimmy HaveHave

Offline Offline

Posts: 15237





Ignore
« Reply #2404 on: Friday, April 10, 2020, 18:50:18 »

That’s incorrect - 5706 it was.

8681 new cases showing today
Logged

So, give no fucks
AldbourneRed

Offline Offline

Posts: 343





Ignore
« Reply #2405 on: Friday, April 10, 2020, 18:55:49 »

That’s incorrect - 5706 it was.
8681 did actually test positive but that's because they've started including swab testing in the figures from today, so the number isn't comparable to previous days.
5195 is how many would have been reported by the previous criteria, but there were in fact 8681 positive tests.


This is the government statement:

"Today’s figures for positive tests have been adjusted to include positive case results from swab testing for key workers and their households (pillar 2). These will be included in the daily figures from today, 10 April. If these results were excluded from the figures, as they have been previously, the daily increase in the number of people who tested positive would have been 5,195. Data on positive case results from swab testing for key workers and their households between 25 March and 8 April is available"
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/coronavirus-covid-19-information-for-the-public
Logged
The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey

Offline Offline

Posts: 19383


?Absolute Calamity!?




Ignore
« Reply #2406 on: Friday, April 10, 2020, 18:56:08 »

Kenny Dalglish admitted to hospital with it.
Logged
Jimmy HaveHave

Offline Offline

Posts: 15237





Ignore
« Reply #2407 on: Friday, April 10, 2020, 18:59:02 »

8681 did actually test positive but that's because they've started including swab testing in the figures from today, so the number isn't comparable to previous days.
5195 is how many would have been reported by the previous criteria, but there were in fact 8681 positive tests.


This is the government statement:

"Today’s figures for positive tests have been adjusted to include positive case results from swab testing for key workers and their households (pillar 2). These will be included in the daily figures from today, 10 April. If these results were excluded from the figures, as they have been previously, the daily increase in the number of people who tested positive would have been 5,195. Data on positive case results from swab testing for key workers and their households between 25 March and 8 April is available"
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/coronavirus-covid-19-information-for-the-public

It's certainly confusing!
Logged

So, give no fucks
StfcRusty

Offline Offline

Posts: 793




Ignore
« Reply #2408 on: Friday, April 10, 2020, 19:05:55 »

Kenny Dalglish admitted to hospital with it.

Actually he was admitted for an unrelated infection but routine coronavirus test showed he has it.  Currently asymptomatic which, if that remains the case, would be very interesting and encouraging really given his age.  Could mean that there's a lot more people out there, and not just young healthly people, who have or have had the virus
Logged
Jimmy HaveHave

Offline Offline

Posts: 15237





Ignore
« Reply #2409 on: Friday, April 10, 2020, 19:13:50 »

Actually he was admitted for an unrelated infection but routine coronavirus test showed he has it.  Currently asymptomatic which, if that remains the case, would be very interesting and encouraging really given his age.  Could mean that there's a lot more people out there, and not just young healthly people, who have or have had the virus

A healthy guy from work self isolated two weeks ago with a sore throat and sadly deteriorated and we were told yesterday that he had passed away so it proves nobody is safe from the virus
Logged

So, give no fucks
Flashheart

« Reply #2410 on: Friday, April 10, 2020, 19:15:51 »

8681 did actually test positive but that's because they've started including swab testing in the figures from today, so the number isn't comparable to previous days.
5195 is how many would have been reported by the previous criteria, but there were in fact 8681 positive tests.


This is the government statement:

"Today’s figures for positive tests have been adjusted to include positive case results from swab testing for key workers and their households (pillar 2). These will be included in the daily figures from today, 10 April. If these results were excluded from the figures, as they have been previously, the daily increase in the number of people who tested positive would have been 5,195. Data on positive case results from swab testing for key workers and their households between 25 March and 8 April is available"
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/coronavirus-covid-19-information-for-the-public

OK, that makes sense now.

Similar to that surge in Chinese figures when they changed the criteria for diagnosis, which seemed so much in the distant past.
Logged
RobertT

Offline Offline

Posts: 11717




Ignore
« Reply #2411 on: Friday, April 10, 2020, 19:16:12 »

It's certainly confusing!

Essentially the UK has under reported up until now, the number of people with the Virus.  It's likely a lot of other countries have done the same though.  The UK has focused on Hospital's I think - it's why Swindon's rate of infection seems low but a high % of deaths have occurred.  Italy reverted to a similar approach during their shit storm as they couldn't cope with testing and treating at the same time.

The USA has expanded testing in recent days/past week or so, and you've seen the infection numbers sky rocket as a result.  Think I saw some modelling done that reckoned the infection rate was multiple factors higher than any country is reporting but mortality rate will come in the range of 0.3% to 0.4% (because while death numbers are likely higher than reported, not by the same magnitude as infection).  That's still 3 or 4 times higher than Flu, and shows why the USA is cranking up around 2k deaths a day now.
Logged
Jimmy HaveHave

Offline Offline

Posts: 15237





Ignore
« Reply #2412 on: Friday, April 10, 2020, 19:17:59 »

Essentially the UK has under reported up until now, the number of people with the Virus.  It's likely a lot of other countries have done the same though.  The UK has focused on Hospital's I think - it's why Swindon's rate of infection seems low but a high % of deaths have occurred.  Italy reverted to a similar approach during their shit storm as they couldn't cope with testing and treating at the same time.

The USA has expanded testing in recent days/past week or so, and you've seen the infection numbers sky rocket as a result.  Think I saw some modelling done that reckoned the infection rate was multiple factors higher than any country is reporting but mortality rate will come in the range of 0.3% to 0.4% (because while death numbers are likely higher than reported, not by the same magnitude as infection).  That's still 3 or 4 times higher than Flu, and shows why the USA is cranking up around 2k deaths a day now.

Thanks for explaining Robert
Logged

So, give no fucks
Quagmire

Offline Offline

Posts: 4629





Ignore
« Reply #2413 on: Friday, April 10, 2020, 20:09:29 »

Well in that case I stand corrected, apologies Mex.
Logged
Flashheart

« Reply #2414 on: Friday, April 10, 2020, 20:10:55 »

Thank fuck it's 'only' 5,000.

What time's we're living in.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 158 159 160 [161] 162 163 164 ... 629   Go Up
Print
Jump to: