Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 ... 27   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Morrison  (Read 47950 times)
Arriba

Offline Offline

Posts: 21289





Ignore
« Reply #300 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 12:48:58 »

Why do you say that?

because he was amazing for us and paid back more than any money can buy
Logged
cheltred69

Offline Offline

Posts: 1028





Ignore
« Reply #301 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 12:52:07 »

Some bizarre claims and counterclaims re the contract clause.  As has been pointed out, it would in no way benefit the club to have this, so it must have been something valued by the player (or more likely his agent) that played a part in the contract negotiation.

Anyway, its history.  In reality though, I can't see that we'd have got much more than £250K for Morrison in the current market, so a higher release clause (or the absence of one) would have meant that we'd be keeping him longer.

Opinion seems to be split, but mine is that, as he clearly wants away he's not here for the long term so as long as we can get a replacement in to at least see out the remainder of this season, its good business for us.

When he came in he team as a 17 yr old I thought he had great potential but he doesn't seem to have developed as much as I'd hoped he might.  I can't help but compare him to Matty Heywood, who had great games but also made poor mistakes. He went off to City hoping for a bigger move.  I know MH was older and there is still time for Sean to develop but my punt is that he'll end up as a similar journeyman League 1/2 player.
Logged
bobby

Offline Offline

Posts: 171





Ignore
« Reply #302 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 12:55:52 »

Has it been confirmed yet that he is moving? If not anyone think he will play today?
Logged
STFC-4-LIFE

« Reply #303 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 12:57:49 »

Has it been confirmed yet that he is moving? If not anyone think he will play today?

He is definitely going and won't play today because Reading won't want him to risk getting injured.
Logged
bassett boy

Offline Offline

Posts: 689


we will overcome




Ignore
« Reply #304 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 13:09:38 »

because he was amazing for us and paid back more than any money can buy
Totally agree with you we could do with him today
Logged
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!

Offline Offline

Posts: 14524



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #305 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 14:34:41 »

I cant.

If what DRS has heard is true, then its beggars belief we put that in there.

Fitton just said if they hadn't put the clause in, Morrison wouldn't have signed. I believe Fitton 100%
Logged
carbonwhite

Offline Offline

Posts: 1939





Ignore
« Reply #306 on: Sunday, January 16, 2011, 00:42:04 »

mentions about morrison leaving and an offer for austin also a few comments that i havnt seen before

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,12874_6665581,00.html
Logged
Spencer_White

« Reply #307 on: Sunday, January 16, 2011, 09:22:08 »

I know yesterday was a load of shite going forward, but I thought we looked a lot better with LJF at the back with Cuthbert, and I think we would have kept them out if Rose hadnt been sent off.
Logged
michael
The Dude Abides

Offline Offline

Posts: 3237




Ignore
« Reply #308 on: Sunday, January 16, 2011, 09:33:45 »

There won't be any 'sell on' clauses, will there?

Reading met the release fee. No need for further negotiation on their part.
Logged
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36319




« Reply #309 on: Sunday, January 16, 2011, 10:16:13 »

Regardless of who put the clause in his contract, how did Reading know about it? I can't imagine wanting to sell him, maybe in the summer but not now. The player wanted out and if that's the case why do we want him here?
Logged
THE FLASH

Offline Offline

Posts: 9421


Quick as a Flash!




Ignore
« Reply #310 on: Sunday, January 16, 2011, 12:06:33 »

Austin looked like Paynter at Wembley yesterday.
Logged

Clems Army!
DiV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 32335


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #311 on: Sunday, January 16, 2011, 13:28:06 »

Regardless of who put the clause in his contract, how did Reading know about it? I can't imagine wanting to sell him, maybe in the summer but not now. The player wanted out and if that's the case why do we want him here?

Morrison would have been out of contract in the summer.

I assume they knew about the clause because it came up on the screen when they clicked on his name, fm style.
Logged
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36319




« Reply #312 on: Sunday, January 16, 2011, 16:32:58 »

Morrison would have been out of contract in the summer.

I assume they knew about the clause because it came up on the screen when they clicked on his name, fm style.

What screen? I thought contracts were signed paper documents which were between the club and the player. One would have to divulge the contents to other parties. I'm guessing it's the agent in this case. Going to get a nice fee out of it.
Logged
DiV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 32335


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #313 on: Sunday, January 16, 2011, 17:29:04 »

Whoosh.

Real life is exactly like FM, no?
Logged
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36319




« Reply #314 on: Sunday, January 16, 2011, 17:36:08 »

I got the FM reference but seeing as you always think you're right I wasn't entirely sure you were capable of sarcasm. My mistake.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 ... 27   Go Up
Print
Jump to: