OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
 Offline
Posts: 14526
|
 |
« Reply #270 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 08:41:44 » |
|
I really hate this term because it always comes back to haunt us.
'easily replaceable' certainly has a very familiar ring to it. And we are absolutely threadbear at the back. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
leefer
Offline
Posts: 12851
|
|
« Reply #271 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 08:48:36 » |
|
£250,000 is the sort of crap standard clause you put on somebody on Championship manager when they won't sign a deal, not agreeing to it on a 20ish year old who has shown promise
 While you are on here Dach dont suppose you got one of his shirts i can buy |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Barnard
Offline
Posts: 735
|
|
« Reply #272 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 09:00:19 » |
|
I think he'll go on to be a good player in a few years time.
Saying that, he's not what we need right now and apparently didn't see his future here. I'm reasonably happy with £250k for him, as long as we get someone in with the money.
Fitton doesn't appear to have wanted him to go, so hopefully the money won't be included in any budgetary planning and will be available for the team rather than running costs.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Don Rogers Shop
|
|
« Reply #273 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 09:40:52 » |
|
Just got of the phone to someone who reckons Sean never once turned down a contract and it wasn't him or his agent who insisted on the clause. Massive piece of humble pie from me to be eaten after what i said last night.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
 Online
Posts: 55441
|
|
« Reply #274 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 09:43:06 » |
|
Just got of the phone to someone who reckons Sean never once turned down a contract and it wasn't him or his agent who insisted on the clause. Massive piece of humble pie from me to be eaten after what i said last night.
So who is lying, Fitton, your mate, Morrison, Morrison's agent or the Adver. Impossible to know! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16354
|
|
« Reply #275 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 09:51:25 » |
|
Thing is, it makes less than no sense for the club to insist on the clause
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 14526
|
|
« Reply #276 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 09:53:45 » |
|
Why the fuck would the Club put that clause in?? The Club didn't need to put such a clause in. It's up to them whether they accept a bid of 250k or not.
I'm swearing more than I should these days. STFC does that to you I suppose.
Edit: beat me to it Dave!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Don Rogers Shop
|
|
« Reply #277 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 09:54:30 » |
|
Think it was more along the lines of he was going to leave out of contract at the end of the season so was offered that deal .That's the way i thought he meant it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 14526
|
|
« Reply #278 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 09:56:12 » |
|
OK, I can see the logic behind that.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32338
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #279 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 10:40:35 » |
|
OK, I can see the logic behind that.
I cant. If what DRS has heard is true, then its beggars belief we put that in there. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 14526
|
|
« Reply #280 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 10:43:38 » |
|
I cant.
If what DRS has heard is true, then its beggars belief we put that in there.
If he was stedfastly not signing a new contract then they had to do something. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
leefer
Offline
Posts: 12851
|
|
« Reply #281 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 10:45:33 » |
|
It dosn't matter,...he is gone,some people are a bit cheezed,some dont give a shit......lets move on and get behind the team.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32338
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #282 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 10:49:16 » |
|
If he was stedfastly not signing a new contract then they had to do something.
So, he's not going to sign a new contract so we tempt him by inserting a clause that has very little effect on Morrison himself and completely screws us over should someone want to sign him? Plus, DRS said he never turned down a contract? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Saxondale
Online
Posts: 6392
|
|
« Reply #283 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 10:54:52 » |
|
So at the end of the season we loose him for nothing if we dont put that clause in, instead we loose him now for 250k. I rather get money for him than loose him for nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Never knowingly overstated.
|
|
|
leefer
Offline
Posts: 12851
|
|
« Reply #284 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 10:57:01 » |
|
So at the end of the season we loose him for nothing if we dont put that clause in, instead we loose him now for 250k. I rather get money for him than loose him for nothing.
He had another season left...signed a years extension.anyway onwards and upwards. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
