|
|
|
Coca Fola
|
 |
« Reply #136 on: Saturday, November 5, 2011, 19:40:16 » |
|
That's actually quite nice.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
stfcinbmth
|
|
« Reply #137 on: Saturday, November 5, 2011, 19:42:52 » |
|
That's actually quite nice.
It's not really is it? But if it swells the coffers, the more high profile sponsors the better |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Summerof69
 Offline
Posts: 8598
|
|
« Reply #138 on: Saturday, November 5, 2011, 19:43:45 » |
|
It's just this season's shirt with different sponsors, but it probably looks better with the old school white shorts.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Coca Fola
|
|
« Reply #139 on: Saturday, November 5, 2011, 19:44:01 » |
|
Although it is just the normal home shirt with a different sponsor. Anyone who buys it is an idiot.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bumpkin
Offline
Posts: 387
|
|
« Reply #140 on: Saturday, November 5, 2011, 20:53:17 » |
|
I think the white shorts is to commemorate the 21 years since The Sunday P****e ran a sensationalist story about Swindon Town.
The shorts have been on sale in the shop since September
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14187
|
|
« Reply #141 on: Saturday, November 5, 2011, 21:13:06 » |
|
It should be compulsory that any shirt sold, also has to have CUNT 1 on the back.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
chalkies_shorts
|
|
« Reply #142 on: Saturday, November 5, 2011, 21:15:46 » |
|
It should be compulsory that any shirt sold, also has to have CUNT 1 on the back.
The Scum beat us to that one |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Costanza
Offline
Posts: 10644
|
|
« Reply #143 on: Saturday, November 5, 2011, 22:28:27 » |
|
If fans want to own the shirt then let them.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LucienSanchez
Offline
Posts: 5160
Is this hospital called St. Croc of Shit?!
|
|
« Reply #144 on: Saturday, November 5, 2011, 22:51:03 » |
|
i like the shorts...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
We made a promise we swore we'd always remember... no retreat, baby, no surrender
|
|
|
PocketScience
Offline
Posts: 293
|
|
« Reply #145 on: Saturday, November 5, 2011, 23:26:39 » |
|
That's actually quite nice.
It is, but only 'cos the first one looked so bad. (And like you say its the home shirt with a different sponsor). I do like having the white shorts though |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #146 on: Sunday, November 6, 2011, 09:10:44 » |
|
i like the shorts...
Me too. I'd like to see us alternate red and white shorts each year, when I started going again regularly in the early 2000s we wore white shorts so to me it seems almost traditional. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nomoreheroes
The Moral Majority
Offline
Posts: 14649
|
|
« Reply #147 on: Sunday, November 6, 2011, 09:46:00 » |
|
That's actually quite nice.
Its just the normal shirt with a different (lower class, trashy) sponsor. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
You're my incurable malady. I miss the pleasure of your company.
|
|
|
Leggett
Do you like popsicles?
Offline
Posts: 7651
|
|
« Reply #148 on: Sunday, November 6, 2011, 12:25:24 » |
|
shorts nice, sponsor bad.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fuck you Leggett, fuck you.
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 14513
|
|
« Reply #149 on: Sunday, November 6, 2011, 13:40:02 » |
|
Me too.
I'd like to see us alternate red and white shorts each year, when I started going again regularly in the early 2000s we wore white shorts so to me it seems almost traditional.
It is traditional, not almost. [statto geek]we wore white shorts from 1898 through to 1972 then from 74 to 91 then went back to them again from 99 to 06[/statto geek] |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
