Pages: [1]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Ratings  (Read 1692 times)
adje

Offline Offline

Posts: 13699





Ignore
« on: Wednesday, February 15, 2006, 12:52:24 »

Evans 6-not a single shot to save-came off his line well and not troubled by crosses.
Smith 6-part of a solid back 4 got forward well
O'Hanlon 7-gets better all the time
Ifil 8-even managed to play a superb ball down the line to Brown as well as his usual immense tackling
Nicholas 7- continues to look more like his old self
Shakes 6-little bit disappointing,not many crosses and seemed to be knocked off the ball too easily
Gurney 5-completely anonymous
Smith 7-missed him when he went off
Brown 7-constant threat but should have scored
Cureton 7-great finish,looked sharp but still guilty of profligacy
Peacock 7-just like Fallon-without the goals.Faallon would have buried at least one of his two chances
Migz 6-strangely subdued
Roberts 6-should have come on 10 minutes earlier imo


Dont want to get too carried away as Gillingscum were by far the worst side I've seen this season.Their no 6 was a pub player!Dont like the way Gillingham had so much posession with 10 men.Result that counts tho'.
Logged

quot;Molten memories splashing down
 upon the rooves of Swindon Town"
Piemonte

« Reply #1 on: Wednesday, February 15, 2006, 12:53:44 »

beat you by a minute Adje Cheesy
Logged
adje

Offline Offline

Posts: 13699





Ignore
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday, February 15, 2006, 12:56:30 »

One-nil to the Pie!
Logged

quot;Molten memories splashing down
 upon the rooves of Swindon Town"
Tails

Offline Offline

Posts: 10011


Git facked




Ignore
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday, February 15, 2006, 13:06:09 »

Peacock offers more than Fallon IMO.
Logged
janaage
People's Front of Alba

Offline Offline

Posts: 14825





Ignore
« Reply #4 on: Wednesday, February 15, 2006, 13:14:40 »

"Peacock 7-just like Fallon-without the goals.Fallon would have buried at least one of his two chances"

What the fuck is that all about?  If Rory was playing Curo would have been as ineffective as he used to be.  Peacock and Curo are a partnership ffs.
Logged
Piemonte

« Reply #5 on: Wednesday, February 15, 2006, 13:15:58 »

my ratings thread is so much better than this one Wink
Logged
mbongo

« Reply #6 on: Wednesday, February 15, 2006, 13:19:29 »

i don't know what everyone's problem is with gurns - he's still pretty good i think. good tackler, strong, good passer, good crosser, decent shot. what's wrong with him? we don't always have to have someone to have a go at you know
Logged
janaage
People's Front of Alba

Offline Offline

Posts: 14825





Ignore
« Reply #7 on: Wednesday, February 15, 2006, 13:24:12 »

He's a poor mans Paul Smith   Wink
Logged
adje

Offline Offline

Posts: 13699





Ignore
« Reply #8 on: Wednesday, February 15, 2006, 13:29:21 »

Quote from: "janaage"
"Peacock 7-just like Fallon-without the goals.Fallon would have buried at least one of his two chances"

What the fuck is that all about?  If Rory was playing Curo would have been as ineffective as he used to be.  Peacock and Curo are a partnership ffs.



You may be right-all I was saying is that Fallon finishes better than Peacock on the evidence so far.FFS!
Logged

quot;Molten memories splashing down
 upon the rooves of Swindon Town"
adje

Offline Offline

Posts: 13699





Ignore
« Reply #9 on: Wednesday, February 15, 2006, 13:32:41 »

Gurney is the "new Hewlett".That is,he doesn't really contribute,very rarely "troubles the scorer"and cant pass.If he wasn't in the side,I wouldn't"have a go "at anyone
Logged

quot;Molten memories splashing down
 upon the rooves of Swindon Town"
McLovin

« Reply #10 on: Wednesday, February 15, 2006, 13:47:47 »

Gurns has been remarkably poor in the last two games.  Should be dropped for Saturday.
Logged
Barmyarmysteve

« Reply #11 on: Wednesday, February 15, 2006, 15:28:37 »

Agree with Dave gurney has been poor and should be dropped saturday.Migz or CCP(if fit) could come in for him
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: