Elsterap
Offline
Posts: 338
|
|
« on: Saturday, February 4, 2006, 17:36:16 » |
|
Rhys 7 - Did what he had to apart from the goal J Smith 6 - Mostly anonymous but made a couple of good tackles Ifil 6 - Not up to usual but mainly because other people done what he usually does. O'Hanlon 6 - Not much to do for most of game Nicho 6 - Same as O'Hanlon Shakes 8 - Good runs, excellent passes, done well to get a head on the ball for goal MOTM Brown 7 - Good runs, good passes, sometimes didnt do what he needed to CCP 7 - Done well, came back when needed, good goal P Smith 7 - Pretty Solid through most of game, more quiet towards end Peacock 7 - Came back a lot to midfield to tackle, didnt always get into centre forward position for Shakes's or Brown's runs. Cureton 7 - Played the target man and got onto some long balls from Shakes well. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Holgate 5 - Too weak to stay on the ball for too ong. Didnt try hard enough to get the ball. With the fairies. Gurney 6 - Not good enough.
Overall a very entertaining game, which we dominated for most of the game. The last 15-30minutes were quite worrying with Swindon playing far too deeply.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Saturday, February 4, 2006, 17:59:42 » |
|
Rhys 7 Smith 7 Ifil 7 O Hanlon 7 Nicho 7 Shakes 8 Brown 7 CCP 7 Smith 7 Peacock 7 Cureton 7
Holgate 5. He was awful. end of Gurney 6. was just there really.
cant be bothered to write loads at the moment.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:01:30 » |
|
Holgate 3 - was put in and decided to fall over the ball!
Shakes was my MOTM for the 2nd game running.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
my-velocity
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:01:56 » |
|
Rhys 7 Smith 7 Ifil 7 O Hanlon 7 Nicho 7 Shakes 8 Brown 7 CCP 7 Smith 7 Peacock 7 Cureton 7
Holgate 5. He was awful. end of Gurney 6. was just there really.
cant be bothered to write loads at the moment. I agree with this one.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dogs
Offline
Posts: 800
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:11:18 » |
|
Rhys 7 - Not too much to do but some good claims Smith 5 - gave the ball away too much, and allowed players goal side Ifil 7 - Positional play a lot better and solid O Hanlon 7 Won nearly everything but needs to improve his clearances (as usual) Nicho 7 - Reliable again Shakes 9 - MOTM ran for everywhere today and obviously got us a goal Brown 8 - Like Shakes but without the goal CCP 8 - All over the pitch and a good finish Smith 7 - Showed an experienced head with some good passing Peacock 7 - Battled for everything, some nice touches and good flick ons Cureton 7 - Some very good crosses and a great flick for CCP's goal
Holgate 3 - Less said the better Gurney 4 - definitely noticed the difference (i.e. we got shit and more overrun in the midfield when he was brought on for Comyn-Platt).
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC Village
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:19:06 » |
|
Evans 6 - Steady i s'pose, made a few half decent saves, no chance with the goal J Smith 7 - Looked a lot more solid at the back than Jenks has been recently Ifil 7 - Steady, distribution still dreadful, but can't fault his defensive capabilities O'Hanlon 6 - Continues his poor recent form, weak link at the back Nicholas 7 - Solid as per usual atm CCP 8 - Really well taken goal. Workhorse of the side Shakes 8 - Becoming a very dangerous player on the wing, full of running, worked hard. Nice finish for his goal Brown 8 - Full of running and made a great interception late on P Smith 7 - Didn't look out of place considering it was his first 90 minutes for 2 months Peacock 7 - Held up ball well, good flick-ons, starting to gel with Curo Cureton 7 - Lovely assist for the winner, linked up well with Cock Holgate 4. Thought that was a poor choice of substitution really, should have brought on Trev Gurney 6
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
aroundthefur
Offline
Posts: 319
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:21:00 » |
|
> should have brought on Trev
Benjamin wasn't even on the bench!
BBC Wiltshire reported he's out for three weeks with injury earlier this afternoon.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC Village
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:21:55 » |
|
> should have brought on Trev
Benjamin wasn't even on the bench!
BBC Wiltshire reported he's out for three weeks with injury earlier this afternoon. Whoops! Still shouldn't have brought on the inexperienced Holgate at that stage of the game
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sade
Offline
Posts: 6427
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:22:55 » |
|
Shakes - 9
|
|
|
Logged
|
RED ARMY
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21289
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:36:22 » |
|
o'hanlon was superb.at least a 7,won header after header. i thought cureton or paul smith were the pick of the players. shakes did well but the odd poor touch. brown and nicholas were the weakest players that started but both were ok. gurney was acting like a twat and holgate was dire. but generally a good day for all.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Panda Paws
Offline
Posts: 2170
Arse
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:38:15 » |
|
I'd probably average out at seven, with the exception of Shakes - deffo 9, although he got quite tired by the end.
Peacock deserved at least 8, he was superb today. Just the type of gritty player we need!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32261
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:38:38 » |
|
Evans - 6 - Nothing to do really
J.Smith - 6 - Solid(ish) certainly more solid than Jenks has been Ifil - 6 - Not up to the high standard he has set recently, lost his position for the goal...not something he has done for a while O'Hanlon - 6 - Strong in the air Nicholas - 6 - Generally solid, still worried me a few times today
Shakes - 8 - Full of running, much better crosses some lovely cross field balls to Cureton. Just needs to realise when he has time on the ball and when he hasnt P.Smith - 7 - Thought he was very good, won tackle after tackle and used the ball well, also cushioned his headers to team members, no one at Swindon ever does that. Would have got my man of the match but faded last 15. Clearly not 100% fit but for 75/80 minutes bossed midfield CCP - 7 - Very good game, lot of hard work. Very well taken goal. Looked much better with him on the pitch than without Brown - 6 - Good game, lots of running
Cureton - 7 - Worked his nuts off, some good touches as well Peacock - 7 - Powerhouse!
Subs.
Gurney - 4 - All he seemed to do was foul and kick the ball in the air!! Holgate - 3 - Just wanted that extra 2nd that he didnt have
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21289
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:42:24 » |
|
Evans - 6 - Nothing to do really
J.Smith - 6 - Solid(ish) certainly more solid than Jenks has been Ifil - 6 - Not up to the high standard he has set recently, lost his position for the goal...not something he has done for a while O'Hanlon - 6 - Strong in the air Nicholas - 6 - Generally solid, still worried me a few times today
Shakes - 8 - Full of running, much better crosses some lovely cross field balls to Cureton. Just needs to realise when he has time on the ball and when he hasnt P.Smith - 7 - Thought he was very good, won tackle after tackle and used the ball well, also cushioned his headers to team members, no one at Swindon ever does that. Would have got my man of the match but faded last 15. Clearly not 100% fit but for 75/80 minutes bossed midfield CCP - 7 - Very good game, lot of hard work. Very well taken goal. Looked much better with him on the pitch than without Brown - 6 - Good game, lots of running
Cureton - 7 - Worked his nuts off, some good touches as well Peacock - 7 - Powerhouse!
Subs.
Gurney - 4 - All he seemed to do was foul and kick the ball in the air!! Holgate - 3 - Just wanted that extra 2nd that he didnt have agree mostly,but wouldn't score shakes so high.also o'hanlon deseves a 7. p smith or curo for me as mom
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yeo
Offline
Posts: 3651
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:44:54 » |
|
insane.
Shakes was far and away man of the match.
Were still going down though.
(must remain negative its worked so far)
|
|
|
Logged
|
/ W56196272
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:46:45 » |
|
Yes i agree, everybody so far has said how good Shakes was.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|