walrus
Offline
Posts: 4228
|
|
« Reply #45 on: Monday, January 30, 2006, 14:12:04 » |
|
Am I the only one who think it's an alright signing? We've probably got him dirt cheap and it's another body up front. If he's parp he'll be a backup anyway. We've got a rejuvenated Cureton and impressive-looking Peacock up front, with Benjamin to come in and fight for a place alongside the keen Holgate.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #46 on: Monday, January 30, 2006, 14:14:11 » |
|
Walrus you'd think a turd on a stick was a good signing.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
|
« Reply #47 on: Monday, January 30, 2006, 14:16:44 » |
|
If on January 30th 2005 someone said to me that this time a year from now the Swindon Town strikeforce would be Jamie Cureton, Lee Peacock and Trevor Benjamin... I would have slit my wrists (metaphorically)
It's a funny old game.
:?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
McLovin
|
|
« Reply #48 on: Monday, January 30, 2006, 14:18:21 » |
|
Walrus you'd think a turd on a stick was a good signing. They are similar...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Marie
|
|
« Reply #49 on: Monday, January 30, 2006, 14:31:38 » |
|
Steve Jenkins was a "league 2 reject" from the same club. Hes done well for us this season.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #50 on: Monday, January 30, 2006, 14:32:47 » |
|
not exactly an inspiring signing, i pray to god this isn't where fallon's wages have gone and we'll be bringing another player in before the deadline. in which case, they better hurry up :shock: i suppose he's the sort of player we can bring on to try and change the game, flail around and barge into defenders. hooray! If on January 30th 2005 someone said to me that this time a year from now the Swindon Town strikeforce would be Jamie Cureton, Lee Peacock and Trevor Benjamin... I would have slit my wrists (metaphorically)
It's a funny old game.
:? on paper, peacock and cureton are a decent strikeforce so i have no idea what you're on about.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #51 on: Monday, January 30, 2006, 14:36:17 » |
|
on paper, peacock and cureton are a decent strikeforce Sadly, the League will insist on us playing on grass, not paper .....
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #52 on: Monday, January 30, 2006, 14:37:18 » |
|
it'd be a waste of trees if we played on paper. johnny doyle wouldn't be happy :-))(
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nomoreheroes
The Moral Majority
Offline
Posts: 14689
|
|
« Reply #53 on: Monday, January 30, 2006, 14:40:23 » |
|
on paper, peacock and cureton are a decent strikeforce Sadly, the League will insist on us playing on grass, not paper ..... Best post ever !!! NMH
|
|
|
Logged
|
You're my incurable malady. I miss the pleasure of your company.
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
|
« Reply #54 on: Monday, January 30, 2006, 14:44:24 » |
|
not exactly an inspiring signing, i pray to god this isn't where fallon's wages have gone and we'll be bringing another player in before the deadline. in which case, they better hurry up :shock: i suppose he's the sort of player we can bring on to try and change the game, flail around and barge into defenders. hooray! If on January 30th 2005 someone said to me that this time a year from now the Swindon Town strikeforce would be Jamie Cureton, Lee Peacock and Trevor Benjamin... I would have slit my wrists (metaphorically)
It's a funny old game.
:? on paper, peacock and cureton are a decent strikeforce so i have no idea what you're on about. I disliked Peacock and Cureton and have never rated Benjamin. Personal preference and not based on actual ability - with the exception of Benjamin. I'm not saying they'll be rubbish for us.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #55 on: Monday, January 30, 2006, 14:47:02 » |
|
fair enough. i used to hate roberts and when he signed i slagged him off to the extreme.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
walrus
Offline
Posts: 4228
|
|
« Reply #56 on: Monday, January 30, 2006, 14:50:13 » |
|
Give the lad a chance! How long has he signed for? Six months surely? If he's crap we can put him in the same folder as Jon Stevenson and Lloyd Opara. If he's half-decent, then we've gained something. I imagine he'll cost fuck-all, and as Marie said, one League Two reject has done alright.... Jenkins is a quality signing, if not just for his homeless-like appearance.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
|
« Reply #57 on: Monday, January 30, 2006, 14:51:10 » |
|
fair enough. i used to hate roberts and when he signed i slagged him off to the extreme. As did I.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #58 on: Monday, January 30, 2006, 14:52:48 » |
|
Give the lad a chance! How long has he signed for? Six months surely? If he's crap we can put him in the same folder as Jon Stevenson and Lloyd Opara. If he's half-decent, then we've gained something. I imagine he'll cost fuck-all, and as Marie said, one League Two reject has done alright.... Jenkins is a quality signing, if not just for his homeless-like appearance. Is he?. :?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
walrus
Offline
Posts: 4228
|
|
« Reply #59 on: Monday, January 30, 2006, 14:53:53 » |
|
Give the lad a chance! How long has he signed for? Six months surely? If he's crap we can put him in the same folder as Jon Stevenson and Lloyd Opara. If he's half-decent, then we've gained something. I imagine he'll cost fuck-all, and as Marie said, one League Two reject has done alright.... Jenkins is a quality signing, if not just for his homeless-like appearance. Is he?. :? Given his gutsy performances and experience I think he is an asset to the squad. We've certainly missed him when he's injured, and means we've actually got competition for the right-back slot...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|