Poll
Question: Which Party Will You Be Voting For?
Conservative - 54 (30.5%)
Labour - 63 (35.6%)
Liberal Democrat - 29 (16.4%)
UKIP - 6 (3.4%)
Green - 5 (2.8%)
SNP - 0 (0%)
Plaid Cymru - 0 (0%)
Other - 2 (1.1%)
Not Voting - 9 (5.1%)
Spoiled Ballot - 9 (5.1%)
Total Voters: 153

Pages: 1 ... 45 46 47 [48] 49 50 51 ... 71   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: General Election - Who's Getting Your Vote?  (Read 195865 times)
StfcRusty

Offline Offline

Posts: 793




Ignore
« Reply #705 on: Sunday, June 4, 2017, 19:48:04 »

Seriously, do we really have so many soft liberal bastards in these parts 😂. Macdonald, he's a fucking Marxist if ever their was one, of course Corbyn has his hand in he communist camp. And you accuse me of talking bollocks. In light of the terrorist attacks you should be ashamed to associate with 'friend of the terrorist' Corbyn, and yes he absolutely did say that himself.
Jesus wept, this country is going down the shitter thanks to these cunty 'tolerant' liberals. Make no mistake, labour are not the Labour Party anymore.

Are you Jim Davidson?
Logged
Sir Cliff Pipehard

Offline Offline

Posts: 268





Ignore
« Reply #706 on: Sunday, June 4, 2017, 21:02:36 »


What Corbyn actually said about killing terrorists on our streets and how the BBC tried to twist it.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-38666914

Notice how they hid this story in the Entertainment and Arts section.
Logged
Sir Cliff Pipehard

Offline Offline

Posts: 268





Ignore
« Reply #707 on: Sunday, June 4, 2017, 21:19:52 »


This is former Met Police Inspector Peter Kirkham pulling no punches  with his views on this government and their attitude towards policing.





Logged
skiptotheLouMacari

Offline Offline

Posts: 964





Ignore
« Reply #708 on: Sunday, June 4, 2017, 21:33:59 »

Nail. Head. Hit.

Yes, but even with the best intelligence services In the world we do not know what Abdul Mohammed and Tariq sitting round the coffee table are thinking or plotting. Interment and isolation for hate preachers sympathisers returning jihdists if born in UK or instant deportation of not. The Mosques that are known radicalisation hot spots need shutting down until the Islamic community understands this can't go on.
Logged
Flashheart

« Reply #709 on: Sunday, June 4, 2017, 21:44:12 »

The Mosques that are known radicalisation hot spots need shutting down until the Islamic community understands this can't go on.

That'll just force them underground.

Best to leave them up and running where they can be monitored.
Logged
Sir Cliff Pipehard

Offline Offline

Posts: 268





Ignore
« Reply #710 on: Sunday, June 4, 2017, 21:47:16 »

The problem is you couldn't sit down and discuss it with ISIS, there is no negotiating with them and I'm not sure why Corbyn thinks he could. The only question is whether we continue to be involved in the military intervention against them or leave others to it. Even if we stayed away we are a Western country thus everything they despise so would always be a target regardless. Iraq was Labours 'foreign policy' so don't see them any more equipped either.

I think you're confusing Corbyn with Owen Smith

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/aug/17/isis-should-get-round-the-table-with-uk-middle-east-says-owen-smith-labour?CMP=share_btn_link

Assad  has been fighting Isis yet we've bombed him, so not sure what our position is to be honest.

Iraq was "New" Labour's foreign policy,which Corbyn vehemently opposed.




Logged
mystical_goat

Offline Offline

Posts: 1421





Ignore
« Reply #711 on: Sunday, June 4, 2017, 22:05:57 »

Yes, but even with the best intelligence services In the world we do not know what Abdul Mohammed and Tariq sitting round the coffee table are thinking or plotting.

Dave and Kev, or worse still nobody at all, are hardly going to figure it out though.
Logged
theakston2k

Offline Offline

Posts: 5306




Ignore
« Reply #712 on: Sunday, June 4, 2017, 22:17:15 »

I think you're confusing Corbyn with Owen Smith

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/aug/17/isis-should-get-round-the-table-with-uk-middle-east-says-owen-smith-labour?CMP=share_btn_link

Assad  has been fighting Isis yet we've bombed him, so not sure what our position is to be honest.

Iraq was "New" Labour's foreign policy,which Corbyn vehemently opposed.





Nah Corbyn has been down a similar road saying we can talk to them through the diplomatic back channels. It was one of the things that caused the fall out with Hilary Benn when he Benn pretty much said it was nonsense.
Logged
Sir Cliff Pipehard

Offline Offline

Posts: 268





Ignore
« Reply #713 on: Sunday, June 4, 2017, 22:46:47 »

Nah Corbyn has been down a similar road saying we can talk to them through the diplomatic back channels. It was one of the things that caused the fall out with Hilary Benn when he Benn pretty much said it was nonsense.

He explains what he means by that in this interview:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/jeremy-corbyn-says-there-could-be-benefits-to-opening-diplomatic-back-channels-with-isis-a6817181.html

Keeping a channel of potential communication open could be to our advantage,and is definitely not negotiating with these pieces of shit.






Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.

Logged
skiptotheLouMacari

Offline Offline

Posts: 964





Ignore
« Reply #714 on: Monday, June 5, 2017, 06:17:55 »

That'll just force them underground.

Best to leave them up and running where they can be monitored.

Understood, however we're monitoring them now and still cannot prevent all attacks.
The only deterrent is isolated internment, don't allow the satisfaction of death and martyrdom, no questions asked support those not originally from UK and the families. 
Logged
pauld
Aaron Aardvark

Offline Offline

Posts: 25436


Absolute Calamity!




Ignore
« Reply #715 on: Monday, June 5, 2017, 07:35:59 »

Of course, when the intelligence services are monitoring known terrorist fighters, it might also help if the government didn't decide to lift all travel restrictions on them to enable to go back to their country of origin to fight in a revolution that happened to be aligned to our foreign policy objectives at the time. As was the case with the Manchester bomber and his family, members of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, an al-Qaida allied Islamist group that were also vehemently anti-Gaddafi. And so were allowed to return to Libya to fight against Gaddafi. Home Secretary at the time? Theresa May

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/may/24/bombers-father-fought-against-gaddafi-regime-with-terrorist-group

That would be the same Theresa May who is currently suppressing publication of the government report on terrorist funding and support in this country because it shows there is a huge influx of funding and support from Saudi Wahabbi extremists. Which might be embarrassing when she was just over there a few weeks ago, flogging them billions worth of arms.

Say what you like about Corbyn being soft on terrorists, at least he's not actively enabling them.
Logged
horlock07

Offline Offline

Posts: 18726


Lives in Northern Bastard Outpost




Ignore
« Reply #716 on: Monday, June 5, 2017, 08:30:08 »

Understood, however we're monitoring them now and still cannot prevent all attacks.
The only deterrent is isolated internment, don't allow the satisfaction of death and martyrdom, no questions asked support those not originally from UK and the families. 

And interment isn't going to create martyrs and act as a recruiting aid?
Logged
skiptotheLouMacari

Offline Offline

Posts: 964





Ignore
« Reply #717 on: Monday, June 5, 2017, 08:47:09 »

And interment isn't going to create martyrs and act as a recruiting aid?

Well they're certainly not going to radicalise anymore naive impressionable or law abiding Muslims
Logged
Sir Cliff Pipehard

Offline Offline

Posts: 268





Ignore
« Reply #718 on: Monday, June 5, 2017, 08:50:09 »

Of course, when the intelligence services are monitoring known terrorist fighters, it might also help if the government didn't decide to lift all travel restrictions on them to enable to go back to their country of origin to fight in a revolution that happened to be aligned to our foreign policy objectives at the time. As was the case with the Manchester bomber and his family, members of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, an al-Qaida allied Islamist group that were also vehemently anti-Gaddafi. And so were allowed to return to Libya to fight against Gaddafi. Home Secretary at the time? Theresa May

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/may/24/bombers-father-fought-against-gaddafi-regime-with-terrorist-group

That would be the same Theresa May who is currently suppressing publication of the government report on terrorist funding and support in this country because it shows there is a huge influx of funding and support from Saudi Wahabbi extremists. Which might be embarrassing when she was just over there a few weeks ago, flogging them billions worth of arms.

Say what you like about Corbyn being soft on terrorists, at least he's not actively enabling them.

Fantastic post,says it all really .
Logged
pauld
Aaron Aardvark

Offline Offline

Posts: 25436


Absolute Calamity!




Ignore
« Reply #719 on: Monday, June 5, 2017, 08:56:39 »

Well they're certainly not going to radicalise anymore naive impressionable or law abiding Muslims
Internment did precisely that when used in N Ireland - "the best recruiting sergeant the IRA ever had"
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 45 46 47 [48] 49 50 51 ... 71   Go Up
Print
Jump to: