Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: leicester city, champions  (Read 10203 times)
suttonred

Offline Offline

Posts: 12510





Ignore
« Reply #30 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2016, 16:03:01 »

Slinky leopard skin outfits dribble dribble.
Logged
Flashheart

« Reply #31 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2016, 16:08:03 »



It seems that more than a few TEF-ers take a Shania Twain approach to this 5,000-1 shot

Man, they feel like women?
Logged
donkey
Cheers!

Offline Offline

Posts: 7035


He headed a football.




Ignore
« Reply #32 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2016, 16:29:32 »

Unusual name, any relation to our donkey?

We were once stabled together.
Logged

donkey tells the truth

I headed the ball.

eeeeeeeeeeeeeee-aaaaaaaawwwwwww
RedRag

Offline Offline

Posts: 3309





Ignore
« Reply #33 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2016, 16:41:36 »

Man, they feel like women?
Always thought Audrey might do.

But no, that don't impress me much.
Logged
inept and tiresome

Offline Offline

Posts: 508




Ignore
« Reply #34 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2016, 17:45:34 »

Every God Damn news broadcast started and ended With Leicester. I don't begrudge them their victory but Im getting a little pissed of with it now.
However, like Reg I don't watch football on TV so know little of their style of play, Gordon Banks seemed to suggest they didn't go in for this pissy, shitty passin around the back until the crowd and the opposition fall asleep but preferred a more exciting form of football. is that correct?
Logged
Ells

Offline Offline

Posts: 3449


I am 32 now




Ignore
« Reply #35 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2016, 17:57:20 »

Every God Damn news broadcast started and ended With Leicester. I don't begrudge them their victory but Im getting a little pissed of with it now.
However, like Reg I don't watch football on TV so know little of their style of play, Gordon Banks seemed to suggest they didn't go in for this pissy, shitty passin around the back until the crowd and the opposition fall asleep but preferred a more exciting form of football. is that correct?

Why did I read this in a redneck voice?
A lot of their results were 1-0s. I wouldn't call them consistently exciting to watch.
Logged

If Don Rogers were alive today, he'd be turning in his grave
inept and tiresome

Offline Offline

Posts: 508




Ignore
« Reply #36 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2016, 18:20:56 »

Why did I read this in a redneck voice?
A lot of their results were 1-0s. I wouldn't call them consistently exciting to watch.

just glad you read it little lady.
Logged
Abrahammer

Offline Offline

Posts: 4823


A legitimate dude sighting




Ignore
« Reply #37 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2016, 18:40:30 »

However, like Reg I don't watch football on TV so know little of their style of play, Gordon Banks seemed to suggest they didn't go in for this pissy, shitty passin around the back until the crowd and the opposition fall asleep but preferred a more exciting form of football. is that correct?

Wouldnt say particularly exciting, I suppose their biggest strengths are organisation, effort, etc which just made them pretty dam hard to break down.

Having a solid back 4 and couple of superb defensive midfielders can do wonders
Logged
reeves4england

Offline Offline

Posts: 15983


We'll never die!




Ignore
« Reply #38 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2016, 19:17:00 »

Wouldnt say particularly exciting, I suppose their biggest strengths are organisation, effort, etc which just made them pretty dam hard to break down.

Having a solid back 4 and couple of superb defensive midfielders can do wonders

This. It's "keep it tight, and hit them on the break" style football. Lots of long balls to nobody. Lots of time without the ball. Our fans would hate it just as much as keeping possession and playing from the back.
Logged
Posh Red
Posh by name, Posh by nature

Offline Offline

Posts: 7259





Ignore
« Reply #39 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2016, 20:35:08 »

Apparently the last first time winners of the championship in England were Nottingham Forest, they went on to win two European Cups.

I know this was before real football started (ie the premier league) but I would suggest that was quite an achievement
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #40 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2016, 20:43:02 »

Apparently the last first time winners of the championship in England were Nottingham Forest, they went on to win two European Cups.

I know this was before real football started (ie the premier league) but I would suggest that was quite an achievement

Atletico, have just reached the final of the CL, and Leicester play a similar basic 4-4-2...built on strong defence and 2 holding midfielders, counter attack and set pieces. So why not?  Smiley
Logged
RobertT

Offline Offline

Posts: 11688




Ignore
« Reply #41 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2016, 21:02:01 »

The interesting thing with Atletico is watching just how well drilled they are, which in the day of the modern millionaire footballers must be tough to sustain.  They initially press with 4 or 5 players when they lose possession.  If they don't disrupt you then see all of them bar the old number 9 drop back into set positions - they literally turn their backs on play and run to where they need to be set-up the next line of defence.  Almost military in precision.  With enough trust they cover pretty much every option once a team gets in their half, they are also then quick to break.  Despite giving up a lot of possession and being fairly defensive, the full backs can still attack when it's on and they can get numbers forward.  Very impressive to watch and all the more impressive that they've kept it going for so long - maybe helped by the fact the best players are always sold on?
Logged
DiV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 32222


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #42 on: Wednesday, May 4, 2016, 08:23:33 »

Every God Damn news broadcast started and ended With Leicester. I don't begrudge them their victory but Im getting a little pissed of with it now.
However, like Reg I don't watch football on TV so know little of their style of play, Gordon Banks seemed to suggest they didn't go in for this pissy, shitty passin around the back until the crowd and the opposition fall asleep but preferred a more exciting form of football. is that correct?

Their defenders defend.
Their central midfielders, press and tackle without the ball. Then pass the ball when they have it.
Their wingers run at the full backs
Their strikers score goals.

Football at its basic and best. No need to over complicate it.
No emphasis on possession - all about scoring more goals than the opposition.
Logged
Honest Lee

Offline Offline

Posts: 224


We are going up ! (sometime)




Ignore
« Reply #43 on: Wednesday, May 4, 2016, 09:27:50 »


It will never catch on.
Logged

The only thing that ever matters is to love and to be loved.
RobertT

Offline Offline

Posts: 11688




Ignore
« Reply #44 on: Wednesday, May 4, 2016, 09:56:31 »

The problem is that most modern footballers believe they are more than that, I present the Chelsea squad.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Up
Print
Jump to: