Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 [15]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: New training ground  (Read 25040 times)
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia


+34/-114
Offline Offline

Posts: 28375





Ignore
« Reply #210 on: Thursday, April 20, 2017, 11:28:14 »

Or DPDS jumping the gun as usual, same as they did on the TipStad fiasco

The line saying DPDS had been involved for years with STFC planning matters is hardly encouraging.
Logged
Tails


+23/-16
Offline Offline

Posts: 7886


Git facked




Ignore
« Reply #211 on: Thursday, April 20, 2017, 11:38:38 »

What is DPDS?
Logged

pauld


+58/-49
Offline Offline

Posts: 17062





Ignore
« Reply #212 on: Thursday, April 20, 2017, 11:43:02 »

What is DPDS?
They're a planning consultancy. They were the ones who did the grand unveiling of the TipStad scheme with Mike Bawden et al back in the day. Shortly before it went TipsUp. Due to not having been properly thought out and a bit unlawful. Oh, and TalkTalk Smiley
Logged
pauld


+58/-49
Offline Offline

Posts: 17062





Ignore
« Reply #213 on: Thursday, April 20, 2017, 11:47:51 »

The club would have to buy land to put the new ground on, guess who owns a lot of the land in the Swindon borough? Now lets say that the club get hold of some land, they need planning permission to build anything in on that land, guess who runs that? The club have come up with many plans to either rebuild the cg or move to a new stadium over the years and the council always step in the way e.g.

- was going to be something up by the M4 J15 - didn't happen as it's not brownfield land, but they can build a hospital
- was going to be where whitchelstow is now - didn't happen
- was going to be north swindon (shaw) - didn't happen
Of the 3 plans you list, none went further than a back page story in the Adver other than the Shaw (TipStad) scheme, which was launched jointly with the then leader of the council. So hardly the council standing in the club's way! It foundered because it was posited on the council selling the club the CG for housing, but at an undeveloped price. Which they weren't lawfully allowed to do. Oh, and Shaw is in West Swindon, not North Swindon.

The only chance of the club getting anything new would be to build it out of the Swindon borough (so either down by chippenham or up by Hungerford).
Bollocks. We have an excellent site for a stadium, which should benefit the club, the town and fans if properly developed. The club is Swindon Town, Chippenham and Hungerford already have teams.
Logged
Power to people


+2/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 5188





Ignore
« Reply #214 on: Thursday, April 20, 2017, 13:07:45 »

They're a planning consultancy. They were the ones who did the grand unveiling of the TipStad scheme with Mike Bawden et al back in the day. Shortly before it went TipsUp. Due to not having been properly thought out and a bit unlawful. Oh, and TalkTalk Smiley

But this time they have seemingly launched it with Fraser Digby involved who seems to be working for Power on this project, I assume it is just in an 'overseeing' capacity and Power trusts him to represent his interests with him being out of the country, not sure if it is just on the training ground  or for the winder development of the land as well.
Logged
RobertT


+23/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 5339




Ignore
« Reply #215 on: Thursday, April 20, 2017, 13:18:06 »

DPDS are up in Old Town, by the Arts Centre.  They seem all right, the consistent failing in STFC planning proposals is more likely STFC and/or the Council Leadership.

This all looks generally positive I would have thought.  You can bet if the Eady money gets used it will tie the club up in knots to ensure it is for the benefit of the club.
Logged
@mwooly63


+0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 2845





Ignore
« Reply #216 on: Thursday, April 20, 2017, 14:15:36 »

But this time they have seemingly launched it with Fraser Digby involved who seems to be working for Power on this project, I assume it is just in an 'overseeing' capacity and Power trusts him to represent his interests with him being out of the country, not sure if it is just on the training ground  or for the winder development of the land as well.

My niece text me yesterday saying just had a meeting with Digby, I asked what about and she replied training ground. Apparently she now does some part time work for Highworth council.
Beyond that she wouldn't elaborate  Hmmm
Logged
horlock07


+31256/-27165
Offline Offline

Posts: 6295


Lives up north




Ignore
« Reply #217 on: Thursday, April 20, 2017, 16:48:18 »

What is DPDS?

A Planning consultancy http://www.dpds.co.uk/ , I had an interview with them when I left University about 20 years back but they didn't give me a job, STFC would no doubt have a new ground already if they had employed me .....  Cheesy (not really!)

The Adver story is very sketchy in areas so I suspect that not too much should be read into its content, I think the only conclusions can be drawn are that a) the Club and Eady Trustees are talking and b) someone has spoken to Highworth Town Council about it. Both entirely logical things to do, but probably too soon to be drawing any conclusions (be them negative or positive).
Logged
pauld


+58/-49
Offline Offline

Posts: 17062





Ignore
« Reply #218 on: Thursday, April 20, 2017, 17:02:08 »

I think the only conclusions can be drawn are that a) the Club and Eady Trustees are talking and b) someone has spoken to Highworth Town Council about it.
On b), it seems according to Sam Morsehead's twitter, that this accounts for the slightly odd timing of the club statement on Tuesday night - they (the club and DPDS) had a meeting with Highworth Council on Tues to update Highworth Council on their (club/DPDS) progress/proposals and the club decided that they should go public about what was happening rather than have half details and rumours leak out. Which seems reasonable, tbf.
Logged
RedRag


+6/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 1381





Ignore
« Reply #219 on: Thursday, April 20, 2017, 19:43:32 »

I thought half details and rumours is what has leaked out from the club?
Logged
Mother Brown


+1/-9
Offline Offline

Posts: 912




Ignore
« Reply #220 on: Thursday, April 20, 2017, 21:39:25 »

Is that security van still parked by the gates ?
Logged
red sheldon


+0/-2
Online Online

Posts: 367



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #221 on: Thursday, April 20, 2017, 21:49:48 »

I thought half details and rumours is what has leaked out from the club?

No its goals that have leaked!
Logged

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 [15]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: