kerry red
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: Thursday, April 17, 2014, 10:38:07 » |
|
I bet half the TEFers have bigger tits than their partners.
Bunch of lard arses!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
Offline
Posts: 12854
|
 |
« Reply #31 on: Thursday, April 17, 2014, 12:34:58 » |
|
Small for me. Prefer quality (shape) to quantity (size).
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mystical_goat
Offline
Posts: 1494
|
 |
« Reply #32 on: Thursday, April 17, 2014, 16:38:13 » |
|
I used to think small (B and below) were okay, and then I went back to having a girlfriend with DD's and my philosophy changed. God, they're great. C minimum.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 15266
|
 |
« Reply #33 on: Thursday, April 17, 2014, 18:32:29 » |
|
100%. That does nothing for me.
I don't understand 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27183
|
 |
« Reply #34 on: Thursday, April 17, 2014, 18:36:51 » |
|
I don't understand  What's not to understand? Boobs > arse/legs.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Flashheart
|
 |
« Reply #35 on: Thursday, April 17, 2014, 18:37:44 » |
|
100%. That does nothing for me.
 ?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27183
|
 |
« Reply #36 on: Thursday, April 17, 2014, 18:41:00 » |
|
Could be a bloke in a wig for all I know. Not even a twitch.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Flashheart
|
 |
« Reply #37 on: Thursday, April 17, 2014, 19:01:35 » |
|
Somebody should start a legs thread now, we might even cure Samdy.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 15266
|
 |
« Reply #38 on: Thursday, April 17, 2014, 19:13:56 » |
|
What's not to understand?
Boobs > arse/legs.
But you don't seem to be saying that, unless I misunderstand, you're saying that you don't even like arses/legs. That's what I'm not comprehending. Just out of interest, my picture was definitely not a bloke. Here 'he' is from the front...  Sofia Vergara - Something for everyone, I hope we can call agree. 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27183
|
 |
« Reply #39 on: Thursday, April 17, 2014, 19:34:14 » |
|
But you don't seem to be saying that, unless I misunderstand, you're saying that you don't even like arses/legs. That's what I'm not comprehending. I like them in the sense that they're an essential part of the human anatomy; women would look pretty odd without them. But to me there is nothing sexually attractive about them.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Only Me
Offline
Posts: 1202
|
 |
« Reply #40 on: Thursday, April 17, 2014, 19:40:29 » |
|
But you don't seem to be saying that, unless I misunderstand, you're saying that you don't even like arses/legs. That's what I'm not comprehending. Just out of interest, my picture was definitely not a bloke. Here 'he' is from the front...  Sofia Vergara - Something for everyone, I hope we can call agree.  Agreed
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 15266
|
 |
« Reply #41 on: Thursday, April 17, 2014, 20:09:53 » |
|
I like them in the sense that they're an essential part of the human anatomy; women would look pretty odd without them. But to me there is nothing sexually attractive about them.
Wow 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27183
|
 |
« Reply #42 on: Thursday, April 17, 2014, 20:23:12 » |
|
Do you find forearms sexually attractive? Or shoulder blades? Or feet?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Flashheart
|
 |
« Reply #43 on: Thursday, April 17, 2014, 20:27:11 » |
|
Shoulder blades can be very sexy.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 15266
|
 |
« Reply #44 on: Thursday, April 17, 2014, 20:53:58 » |
|
Do you find forearms sexually attractive? Or shoulder blades? Or feet?
On the right person, most definitely.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|