Pages: 1 ... 138 139 140 [141] 142 143 144 ... 148   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Jed mccory  (Read 508072 times)
stfcjack

Offline Offline

Posts: 394


The Swindon lot don't seem to respect you




Ignore
« Reply #2100 on: Friday, January 23, 2015, 17:32:06 »

https://twitter.com/berencross/status/558675596273020929

 
Logged
Nemo
Shit Bacon

Online Online

Posts: 21232





Ignore
« Reply #2101 on: Friday, January 23, 2015, 17:33:13 »

Best news we could hope for. Hope Dexter shows up to sob.
Logged
Costanza

Offline Offline

Posts: 10643





Ignore
« Reply #2102 on: Friday, January 23, 2015, 17:53:01 »

Hope Dexter shows up to sob.

For one last homoerotic tirade...
Logged
manc_red

Offline Offline

Posts: 349





Ignore
« Reply #2103 on: Friday, January 23, 2015, 17:57:27 »

Great news.

But I wonder how it was resolved. It's unlikely that there was a further hearing - it was still listed as "awaiting hearing date" last time I checked case tracker a week or so ago, and I can't see that a judgment's been published.

So probably either withdrawn, or settled. Be interesting to hear what the club have to say.
Logged
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel

Offline Offline

Posts: 27137





Ignore
« Reply #2104 on: Friday, January 23, 2015, 18:04:06 »

I hope the fucking chancer gets landed with a massive legal bill now.
Logged
Oaksey Moonraker

Offline Offline

Posts: 899




Ignore
« Reply #2105 on: Friday, January 23, 2015, 18:05:45 »


So probably either withdrawn, or settled. Be interesting to hear what the club have to say.

A Friday statement?
Logged
Sam Morshead

Offline Offline

Posts: 275




Ignore
« Reply #2106 on: Friday, January 23, 2015, 18:11:14 »

http://casetracker.justice.gov.uk/listing_calendar/getDetail.do?case_id=20142410
Logged
Nemo
Shit Bacon

Online Online

Posts: 21232





Ignore
« Reply #2107 on: Friday, January 23, 2015, 18:13:15 »

Quote
Case
Reference: A3/2014/2410

Title: Swinton Reds 20 Limited v McCrory & Anr

Type: Appeal

Appeal / Application:
from the order of Mr Strauss QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge)
High Court Chancery Division Companies Court dated 02-Jul-14
Hearing Status: Hearing Vacated

Venue: London

Constitution:
Not assigned
Not assigned
Not assigned

Case results:
Dismissed on 21-Jan-15

Track Your Case:
Current Status: Matter Dealt with - see Case Results

Tracking Information:
21-Jan-15: Case given a final judgment
28-Oct-14: Case passed to List Office
22-Oct-14: Letter sent to applicant/solicitor to request bundles and/or documents
16-Oct-14: Application allowed on paper by Lord/Lady Justice
30-Sep-14: Application referred to Lord/Lady Justice
17-Sep-14: Bundle corrections were approved
12-Aug-14: Letter sent to applicant/solicitor requesting correction of bundles
Last Updated: 23-Jan-15

In case that link isn't working for anyone else. Not sure it makes much sense to me.
Logged
chalkies_shorts

« Reply #2108 on: Friday, January 23, 2015, 18:18:21 »

He's heard everyone has fucked off to Tenerife and has turned up with his builder mate to change the locks, finish the TownEnd Bar, put a roof on the Stratton Bank and to sell off Rockin robin for the next 10 years to pay back the 1950 debt.
Logged
TheMajorSTFC

Offline Offline

Posts: 2304





Ignore
« Reply #2109 on: Friday, January 23, 2015, 18:21:17 »

Who is/was this Jed McRoarrrrrrrrrry character then?

Good luck paying the legal bills you cunt!!!
Logged

#VivaKenBarlow!
Red and Proud

Offline Offline

Posts: 531




Ignore
« Reply #2110 on: Friday, January 23, 2015, 18:41:14 »

Just the other matter of monies owed/taken to sort out.
Logged
manc_red

Offline Offline

Posts: 349





Ignore
« Reply #2111 on: Friday, January 23, 2015, 18:45:39 »

In case that link isn't working for anyone else. Not sure it makes much sense to me.

The only info of relevance there really is that it's been dismissed.

But that could be dismissed at the appellant's request (I.e. withdrawn), or by consent of both parties (I.e. settled). I'd suspect the latter - it seems unlikely (albeit not unheard of) that anyone would lodge an appeal, get granted permission, only to then withdraw it before an appeal hearing.

More likely to have been settled IMO.

Unless there has been a hearing that we don't know about, but as said above, that also seems unlikely.

Have you heard anything Sam??
Logged
pauld
Aaron Aardvark

Offline Offline

Posts: 25436


Absolute Calamity!




Ignore
« Reply #2112 on: Friday, January 23, 2015, 19:02:55 »

The only info of relevance there really is that it's been dismissed.

But that could be dismissed at the appellant's request (I.e. withdrawn), or by consent of both parties (I.e. settled). I'd suspect the latter - it seems unlikely (albeit not unheard of) that anyone would lodge an appeal, get granted permission, only to then withdraw it before an appeal hearing.
Maybe his lawyer withdrew the appeal when he cottoned on he wasn't likely to get paid?
Logged
TheDukeOfBanbury

Offline Offline

Posts: 4000





Ignore
« Reply #2113 on: Friday, January 23, 2015, 20:01:03 »

Two simple words to Jed and Dexter.

FUCK OFF

Never in doubt.
Logged
manc_red

Offline Offline

Posts: 349





Ignore
« Reply #2114 on: Friday, January 23, 2015, 20:02:03 »

Maybe his lawyer withdrew the appeal when he cottoned on he wasn't likely to get paid?

The lawyer couldn't withdraw it without instructions, but yeah, I guess funding issues could well be a possibility  Smiley
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 138 139 140 [141] 142 143 144 ... 148   Go Up
Print
Jump to: