Nomoreheroes
The Moral Majority
Offline
Posts: 14696
|
|
« Reply #60 on: Thursday, December 26, 2013, 14:17:32 » |
|
What were the substitues? Gladwin for ? Bartram for Thompson? Storey for Ranger?
|
|
|
Logged
|
You're my incurable malady. I miss the pleasure of your company.
|
|
|
kerry red
|
|
« Reply #61 on: Thursday, December 26, 2013, 14:18:26 » |
|
Gladwin for Ajoes
1016 Town fans in attendance out of 8333
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Posh Red
Posh by name, Posh by nature
Offline
Posts: 7377
|
|
« Reply #62 on: Thursday, December 26, 2013, 14:18:51 » |
|
What were the substitues? Gladwin for Ajose Bartram for Thompson? Storey for Ranger?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Berniman
Sits in front of JFW
Offline
Posts: 10768
Miserable cnut (AKA Happy Clapper)
|
|
« Reply #63 on: Thursday, December 26, 2013, 14:20:25 » |
|
At 2-2 they would have been good subs, at 3-2 down too negative, unless Pritch is playing up front. By the sounds of it he isn't. Might as well lose 4-2 going for it rather than 3-2 not.
|
|
|
Logged
|
“Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth.” ― Marcus Aurelius
When somebody shouts STOP! I never know if it's in the name of love, if it's HAMMER TIME, or if I should collaborate and listen...
|
|
|
kerry red
|
|
« Reply #64 on: Thursday, December 26, 2013, 14:22:22 » |
|
This performance would probably been good enough for 5 extra points had we played the same against Crawley and Blades instead of the insipid, limp-wristed shite we served up
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nomoreheroes
The Moral Majority
Offline
Posts: 14696
|
|
« Reply #65 on: Thursday, December 26, 2013, 14:26:34 » |
|
'Ward up front in an Anton van der Linden way'
What way is that, one that doesn't work?
|
|
|
Logged
|
You're my incurable malady. I miss the pleasure of your company.
|
|
|
ghanimah
Offline
Posts: 3639
|
|
« Reply #66 on: Thursday, December 26, 2013, 14:29:38 » |
|
FT 3-2
|
|
|
Logged
|
"We perform the duties of freemen; we must have the privileges of freemen ..."
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 55622
|
|
« Reply #67 on: Thursday, December 26, 2013, 14:30:12 » |
|
Arse.
Didn't sound our worst performance, but that doesn't really matter, we lost.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nomoreheroes
The Moral Majority
Offline
Posts: 14696
|
|
« Reply #68 on: Thursday, December 26, 2013, 14:30:31 » |
|
Arse.
Didn't sound our worst performance, but that doesn't really matter, we lost.
This
|
|
|
Logged
|
You're my incurable malady. I miss the pleasure of your company.
|
|
|
Posh Red
Posh by name, Posh by nature
Offline
Posts: 7377
|
|
« Reply #69 on: Thursday, December 26, 2013, 14:32:15 » |
|
Arse.
Didn't sound our worst performance, but that doesn't really matter, we lost.
Whilst you are right that you don't get points for playing well & losing, at least it gives you more hope than losing & not even putting up any fight.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bob's Orange
Has brain escape barriers
Offline
Posts: 28727
|
|
« Reply #70 on: Thursday, December 26, 2013, 14:34:56 » |
|
Brentford now top.
|
|
|
Logged
|
we've been to Aberdeen, we hate the Hibs, they make us spew up, so make some noise, the gorgie boys, for Hearts in Europe.
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #71 on: Thursday, December 26, 2013, 14:36:17 » |
|
Arse.
Didn't sound our worst performance, but that doesn't really matter, we lost.
We pretty much know we're shit away from home and can't defend, but with this side, I think we need to be offensive, surely bettter to go down 3-2 than 1-0?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bob's Orange
Has brain escape barriers
Offline
Posts: 28727
|
|
« Reply #72 on: Thursday, December 26, 2013, 14:39:21 » |
|
We pretty much know we're shit away from home and can't defend, but with this side, I think we need to be offensive, surely bettter to go down 3-2 than 1-0?
Spot on reg. we have good enough attacking players to win 3-2 more often than lose I reckon!
|
|
|
Logged
|
we've been to Aberdeen, we hate the Hibs, they make us spew up, so make some noise, the gorgie boys, for Hearts in Europe.
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 55622
|
|
« Reply #73 on: Thursday, December 26, 2013, 14:46:07 » |
|
Whilst you are right that you don't get points for playing well & losing, at least it gives you more hope than losing & not even putting up any fight.
Very true. Just disappointed after being ahead twice!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
joteddyred
Offline
Posts: 4363
|
|
« Reply #74 on: Thursday, December 26, 2013, 14:47:06 » |
|
At 2-2 they would have been good subs, at 3-2 down too negative, unless Pritch is playing up front. By the sounds of it he isn't. Might as well lose 4-2 going for it rather than 3-2 not.
Indeed. I'm still not enamored by some of Cooper's substitutions. Didn't expect anything today, but more disappointed to come away with nothing having twice been in front, albeit very briefly the second time.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|