|
Flashheart
|
 |
« on: Wednesday, June 19, 2013, 16:17:03 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bukkake Regiment
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday, June 19, 2013, 16:20:22 » |
|
That is pure bollocks.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Flashheart
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday, June 19, 2013, 16:20:51 » |
|
That 'survey' loses all credibility when taking into account the County Ground's accessibility score. You can't get much better where that is concerned.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter Venkman
We don't need no stinking badges.
 Offline
Posts: 59369
Things can only get better
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday, June 19, 2013, 16:21:52 » |
|
Sour grapes from Norvern Monkeys probably based upon us charging them £25 for entry fee. There are many many grounds much worse than the County Ground on ALL those categories.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Only a fool does not know when to hold his tongue.
|
|
|
|
Bukkake Regiment
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Wednesday, June 19, 2013, 16:22:02 » |
|
Look at League 2, Fratton Park is awarded 1 star, Fleetwood and Chesterfield get 5 stars..  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Wednesday, June 19, 2013, 16:22:06 » |
|
It doesn't make any sense that the CG would receive the lowest score in every single area and be the only team of all to do so. Especially for accessibility!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ghanimah
Offline
Posts: 3639
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Wednesday, June 19, 2013, 16:22:19 » |
|
That 'survey' loses all credibility when taking into account the County Ground's accessibility score. You can't get much better where that is concerned.
Was just going to post that, more bollocks given that Oxford was rated 5. Complete joke. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"We perform the duties of freemen; we must have the privileges of freemen ..."
|
|
|
|
Bukkake Regiment
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Wednesday, June 19, 2013, 16:22:42 » |
|
Brentford and Oldham 5 stars for atmosphere?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Saxondale
Offline
Posts: 6390
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Wednesday, June 19, 2013, 16:25:21 » |
|
Well people think the town is shit and we are too expensive. So I can see the point on town and vcalue there. Also there is a big confusing roundabout outside it which we are quite associated with so acessability they may be thinking of that. But frankly, Ive been to a lot worse in this league. Walsall is hardly nirvana. Crawley is equally shit in every way.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Never knowingly overstated.
|
|
|
Ardiles
Offline
Posts: 11528
Stirlingshire Reds
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Wednesday, June 19, 2013, 16:25:42 » |
|
It's a piss take. Not saying that the County Ground is perfect, but when it scores 1/5 for accessibility and the Priestfield 'Stadium' scores a perfect 5/5, you know something's not right.
And if anyone who had ever tried using the train to reach Oxford's ground had taken part in the survey, I similarly suspect that their accessibility score might also not have been a 5/5 either.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ardiles
Offline
Posts: 11528
Stirlingshire Reds
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Wednesday, June 19, 2013, 16:31:27 » |
|
Oh...and Town/City:
Notts Forest 5/5
Notts County 3/5
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter Venkman
We don't need no stinking badges.
Offline
Posts: 59369
Things can only get better
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Wednesday, June 19, 2013, 16:33:43 » |
|
http://www.owtb.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=42879PS Im also delighted that Swindon Town have achieved such an accurate result! Looks like the vote could have been rigged by Oldham fans then. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Only a fool does not know when to hold his tongue.
|
|
|
4D
Or not 4D that is the question
 Online
Posts: 21905
I can't bear it 🙄
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Wednesday, June 19, 2013, 16:38:07 » |
|
Haha, a nothing survey  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dr Pierre Chang
ITK Curran lover
Offline
Posts: 3002
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Wednesday, June 19, 2013, 16:38:15 » |
|
It obviously isn't the worst ground in the football league, but accessibility aside, it's hard to argue with those scores.
If I was an away fan voting in this having paid £25 to sit in a shite old stand then I would probably slate it as much as possible.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ardiles
Offline
Posts: 11528
Stirlingshire Reds
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Wednesday, June 19, 2013, 16:40:40 » |
|
Very true. It's a 1970s ground with 1970s facilities. I don't think anyone would argue that it should be appearing near the top of a list like that. Just not at the very bottom.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
