Batch
Not a Batch
 Offline
Posts: 55362
|
 |
« Reply #1485 on: Friday, February 8, 2013, 19:14:44 » |
|
Bit of an odd Ward interview in BBC Wilts at 6:30 in regard to the takeover, something like "not sure about whose telling the truth, just getting on with it (playing)". Anyone else hear it or even know what context/question his was reply was in response to?
They also said the FL have asked for clarification on Jed's involvement in Banbury and Swindon.
The 7pm report just said it looks like it'll go through next week.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter Venkman
We don't need no stinking badges.
Offline
Posts: 59358
Things can only get better
|
|
« Reply #1486 on: Friday, February 8, 2013, 19:18:29 » |
|
Yeah I think Sam Morshead (could have been someone else though!) said something along the same lines, that he will not be allowed to hold the Chairmanship of STFC if he is still Chairman at Banbury too, thats the main cause of delay as far as he understands it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Only a fool does not know when to hold his tongue.
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
|
« Reply #1487 on: Friday, February 8, 2013, 19:22:24 » |
|
Yeah I think Sam Morshead (could have been someone else though!) said something along the same lines, that he will not be allowed to hold the Chairmanship of STFC if he is still Chairman at Banbury too, thats the main cause of delay as far as he understands it.
But what's the difference to when Fitton became Chairman here, whilst still Chairman at Hungerford? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
janaage
People's Front of Alba
Offline
Posts: 14825
|
|
« Reply #1488 on: Friday, February 8, 2013, 19:28:43 » |
|
When Fitton took over he said he was continuing at Hungerford on a temporary basis, until the end of the season. Jed has stated STFC role will not affect his role at Banbury i.e. he has not committed to leaving his post at Banbury, like Fitton did at Hungerford.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Flashheart
|
|
« Reply #1489 on: Friday, February 8, 2013, 19:41:44 » |
|
I'm not sure Jed intends to be chairman here for long......
I have nothing to qualify that statement. It's nothing but a hunch.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
A Gent Orange
|
|
« Reply #1490 on: Friday, February 8, 2013, 19:44:08 » |
|
Not sure Jed will be chairman... That never seems to have actually been said. He just seems to have been the one whose identity got out.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
stfcinbmth
|
|
« Reply #1491 on: Friday, February 8, 2013, 19:46:18 » |
|
Thought it was mentioned that he was the one that got the consortium together
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ardiles
Offline
Posts: 11528
Stirlingshire Reds
|
|
« Reply #1492 on: Friday, February 8, 2013, 19:58:01 » |
|
I'm not sure Jed intends to be chairman here for long......
I have nothing to qualify that statement. It's nothing but a hunch.
I'm with you on that. Wouldn't be surprised if he was an introducer/fixer. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #1493 on: Friday, February 8, 2013, 20:03:35 » |
|
i get the impression that McCrory won't have anything to do with the club long term, hence his commitment to Banbury.
it doesn't fill me with confidence that his is the only name that has been made public.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Flashheart
|
|
« Reply #1494 on: Friday, February 8, 2013, 20:10:44 » |
|
To say it's 'just a hunch' may not be entirely true really.
Jed seems very reluctant to leave Banbury and has made noises that he will be doing no such thing. Surely the FA won't accept this on a long term basis.
There's also Paolo's cheeky grin when asked if he had met any of the new lot. From that grin, he knows at least one of them very well and, maybe, considers him to be the best chairman a manager could have.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nomoreheroes
The Moral Majority
 Online
Posts: 14608
|
|
« Reply #1495 on: Friday, February 8, 2013, 20:12:15 » |
|
To say it's 'just a hunch' may not be entirely true really.
Jed seems very reluctant to leave Banbury and has made noises that he will be doing no such thing. Surely the FA won't accept this on a long term basis.
There's also Paolo's cheeky grin when asked if he had met any of the new lot. From that grin, he knows at least one of them very well and, maybe, considers him to be the best chairman a manager could have.
Either him, Fitton or Spencer were the 3 I thought about. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
You're my incurable malady. I miss the pleasure of your company.
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #1496 on: Friday, February 8, 2013, 20:16:45 » |
|
and for the love of god, the spelling of his name is really bothering me
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Flashheart
|
|
« Reply #1497 on: Friday, February 8, 2013, 20:31:42 » |
|
and for the love of god, the spelling of his name is really bothering me
I bet getting confirmation of the spelling of his name is the hold-up. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jonny72
Offline
Posts: 5554
|
|
« Reply #1498 on: Friday, February 8, 2013, 21:01:21 » |
|
There's also Paolo's cheeky grin when asked if he had met any of the new lot. From that grin, he knows at least one of them very well and, maybe, considers him to be the best chairman a manager could have.
Then how do you explain Ritchie being sold and Paolo knowing nothing about it? And Paolo throwing his toys out the pram again? Though having said that, it might explain Black's comments on Twitter. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #1499 on: Friday, February 8, 2013, 21:43:02 » |
|
Then how do you explain Ritchie being sold and Paolo knowing nothing about it? And Paolo throwing his toys out the pram again?
Because that was Black, not the new lot? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
