leefer
 Offline
Posts: 12851
|
 |
« Reply #435 on: Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 20:14:50 » |
|
Christ he's not the mad-eyed slaphead off the telly is he?
Yep....i say you buy one you get one free! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bob's Orange
Has brain escape barriers
 Online
Posts: 28533
|
|
« Reply #436 on: Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 20:14:57 » |
|
Wonder if he wants to get in before the end of the transfer window? Maybe Malcolm glazer is also involved? Jimmy Glass?
That's probably enough now.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
we've been to Aberdeen, we hate the Hibs, they make us spew up, so make some noise,
the gorgie boys, for Hearts in Europe.
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #437 on: Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 20:15:08 » |
|
Eh?
"It is thought Swindon have debts totalling about £13m, and the club have considered entering administration in a bid to wipe £9m owed to investors, including Black and Fitton." http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/21188916 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 55363
|
|
« Reply #438 on: Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 20:15:40 » |
|
Yep....i say you buy one you get one free!
[url width=320 height=240]http://i517.photobucket.com/albums/u339/fil26/BOGOF.jpg[/url] |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
leefer
Offline
Posts: 12851
|
|
« Reply #439 on: Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 20:16:36 » |
|
Wonder if he wants to get in before the end of the transfer window? Maybe Malcolm glazer is also involved? Jimmy Glass?
That's probably enough now.
Our dreams are shattered  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
tans
You spin me right round baby right round
Offline
Posts: 25022
|
|
« Reply #440 on: Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 20:16:53 » |
|
My banbury supporting mate says he invested a lot of money into banbury for that level. Obviously this is a different level. Apparently he fucked over Luton Town.
Hmmm.
As others have said, i will wait to see who else is involved in the consortium before judginfg.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #441 on: Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 20:17:47 » |
|
Riiiiiiggghht. So how's that constitute "not getting their facts right about to whom the money is owed"? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
|
« Reply #442 on: Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 20:17:49 » |
|
He's made a cracking start !!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Flashheart
|
|
« Reply #443 on: Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 20:18:48 » |
|
Riiiiiiggghht. So how's that constitute "not getting their facts right about to whom the money is owed"?
There's no need to be obtuse Paul |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #444 on: Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 20:19:53 » |
|
My banbury supporting mate says he invested a lot of money into banbury for that level. Obviously this is a different level. Apparently he fucked over Luton Town.
Hmmm.
As others have said, i will wait to see who else is involved in the consortium before judginfg.
From what little I can gather from the very small amount of googling that everyone else has done, he was very much a minor player at Luton. So it may not have been him primarily doing any "fucking over". Not that I'd accept that as an excuse for Bob Holt for example |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
horlock07
Offline
Posts: 18726
Lives in Northern Bastard Outpost
|
|
« Reply #445 on: Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 20:21:20 » |
|
Riiiiiiggghht. So how's that constitute "not getting their facts right about to whom the money is owed"?
Well who is the other £4m owed to? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #446 on: Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 20:21:41 » |
|
There's no need to be obtuse Paul
Well, it's a completely different accusation. And a bit rich considering sonic was slamming the BBC for supposedly being inaccurate over basic facts. Pot, kettle and all that |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #447 on: Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 20:22:02 » |
|
Riiiiiiggghht. So how's that constitute "not getting their facts right about to whom the money is owed"?
clearly i've misunderstood, so why not just correct me instead of being obtuse? i thought that the £13m was owed to Black only and that administration was not being considered at all but came from a response Patey gave that nobody could ever rule that out |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 55363
|
|
« Reply #448 on: Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 20:22:32 » |
|
Well who is the other £4m owed to?
The same investors. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Flashheart
|
|
« Reply #449 on: Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 20:23:15 » |
|
From what little I can gather from the very small amount of googling that everyone else has done, he was very much a minor player at Luton. So it may not have been him primarily doing any "fucking over". Not that I'd accept that as an excuse for Bob Holt for example
From all I can see is the negativity has stemmed from one random Joe on a Banbury forum saying 'he's a bit dodgy'. There is nothing of any substance that I can find. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
