jonny72
 Offline
Posts: 5554
|
 |
« Reply #315 on: Friday, January 25, 2013, 15:46:00 » |
|
Or the return of Wray with Fitton + new investment...
That interview with Fitton suggested they disagreed on how to run the club, Fitton wanted to run it break even whilst Wray wanted to run at a loss and chase promotion. Not sure we'll see them back as a double act. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Power to people
Offline
Posts: 6407
|
|
« Reply #316 on: Friday, January 25, 2013, 16:29:41 » |
|
I have this feeling we will see the return of Wray as part of a new consortium, and Fitton will keep a small shareholding along with Black, and there will be a new major shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #317 on: Friday, January 25, 2013, 17:50:30 » |
|
Can't see either returning to be honest. The new owners will want their own men in. If anything it will probably all change.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #318 on: Friday, January 25, 2013, 17:56:10 » |
|
Can't see either returning to be honest. The new owners will want their own men in. If anything it will probably all change.
The suggestion is that they might be (part of) the new owners. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #319 on: Friday, January 25, 2013, 18:07:29 » |
|
The suggestion is that they might be (part of) the new owners.
Suggestion from who? People got a bit too excited at Fitton's comments the other day in my opinion. Unless i'm missing something here? I've been out of the loop a bit in the last 24 hours. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #320 on: Friday, January 25, 2013, 18:14:30 » |
|
Suggestion from who? People got a bit too excited at Fitton's comments the other day in my opinion. Unless i'm missing something here? I've been out of the loop a bit in the last 24 hours.
Sorry, yes, all I meant was that people on here were suggesting that one or both may return as part of a consortium. And I'm inclined to agree, think both Fitton and Wray have been leaving the door open to being invited back on board, rather than hinting at firm plans, FWIW. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14187
|
|
« Reply #321 on: Friday, January 25, 2013, 18:15:22 » |
|
I thought the new owners were red Indians ? I've been doing a rain dance since last night.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #322 on: Friday, January 25, 2013, 18:20:46 » |
|
Sorry, yes, all I meant was that people on here were suggesting that one or both may return as part of a consortium. And I'm inclined to agree, think both Fitton and Wray have been leaving the door open to being invited back on board, rather than hinting at firm plans, FWIW.
Fair enough. I don't think we can rule it out. I'm not opposed to them coming back but think they'd need someone who is willing to fund the CG redevelopment with them. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Flashheart
|
|
« Reply #323 on: Friday, January 25, 2013, 18:24:05 » |
|
If somebody looks out for smoke signals over the CG we might get to know what's happening.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mother Brown
Offline
Posts: 1372
|
|
« Reply #324 on: Friday, January 25, 2013, 18:40:30 » |
|
If somebody looks out for smoke signals over the CG we might get to know what's happening.
Or there could be a new Pope  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Flashheart
|
|
« Reply #325 on: Friday, January 25, 2013, 18:42:37 » |
|
The pope's at the County Ground? Never thought he'd be into buying a football club.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jonny72
Offline
Posts: 5554
|
|
« Reply #326 on: Friday, January 25, 2013, 18:45:27 » |
|
Sorry, yes, all I meant was that people on here were suggesting that one or both may return as part of a consortium. And I'm inclined to agree, think both Fitton and Wray have been leaving the door open to being invited back on board, rather than hinting at firm plans, FWIW.
If either were able to put together a new consortium or find a backer they would have done before now and things would have got to the point they have now. Really can't see this happening. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
suttonred
Offline
Posts: 12510
|
|
« Reply #327 on: Friday, January 25, 2013, 18:47:10 » |
|
If either were able to put together a new consortium or find a backer they would have done before now and things would have got to the point they have now. Really can't see this happening.
Maybe they have, that's just an assumption this has only been happening for the last week or two, when it's probably been going on since SWP joined. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nochee
|
|
« Reply #328 on: Friday, January 25, 2013, 18:49:30 » |
|
Maybe they have, that's just an assumption this has only been happening for the last week or two, when it's probably been going on since SWP joined.
Shits been going on way long before we knew about it |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #329 on: Friday, January 25, 2013, 18:50:24 » |
|
I guess the signs could be there. Wray considered taking action against the FLP and Fitton's been vocal this week. I guess both still own a small stake in the club though so it's probably not worth reading too much into it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
