Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Lee Cox  (Read 10321 times)
ibelieveinmrreeves
Should've gone to Specsavers

Offline Offline

Posts: 3857





Ignore
« Reply #30 on: Monday, March 25, 2013, 15:00:57 »

Well it might be, who knows. Either way your point stands.

Good point; no telling whether the slight that so offended Di Canio was real or imagined.
Logged

Even men with steel hearts love to see a dog on the pitch.
DMR

« Reply #31 on: Monday, March 25, 2013, 15:48:04 »

Big difference between looking good in a bottom Div 4 side and a top end Div 3 side.

More cobblers
Logged
BruceChatwin

Offline Offline

Posts: 1136





Ignore
« Reply #32 on: Monday, March 25, 2013, 16:08:03 »

Still only 22. Think we will seem him back here next season.

Presumably both he and Caddis will be eligible for us in the playoffs, albeit it would be hard to justify either playing.

Wish we had both available for the run-in although arguably A. Rooney is more useful to us than Caddis would be considering our striker situation.
Logged
welshred

Offline Offline

Posts: 1997





Ignore
« Reply #33 on: Monday, March 25, 2013, 16:28:38 »

I'd welcome back all three of our loan players at the end of the season. God knows we could do with the numbers.

Don't think Cox was ever given a fair crack of the whip, Benson is more than an adequate League 1 forward and certainly no worse than we already have and we all know Caddis is good enough for this league (whether or not he'd want to come back or not remains to be seen).
Logged
FormerlyPlymRed

Offline Offline

Posts: 1944




Ignore
« Reply #34 on: Monday, March 25, 2013, 16:59:56 »

I've been to a few Plymouth games recently and he has definitely impressed, would have him back here for next season.

I personally think he would do a better job than miller is doing at the minute as he's very good at harassing and winning the ball back, got a decent pass on him as well. Would do well at this level
Logged
Flashheart

« Reply #35 on: Monday, March 25, 2013, 17:20:22 »

Caddis' called up for Scotland
Logged
Ticker45

Offline Offline

Posts: 733





Ignore
« Reply #36 on: Monday, March 25, 2013, 17:43:48 »

Never saw enough of Cox to really see what he could do and initially was not that impressed, but how he was told to play may have had more of a bearing on his few performances.

None too sure if we will see any of the loanees back here wearing the red again but I have been wrong before and if they are still under contract then I guess KMac would need to have some sort of say.

 Hmmm
Logged

Yesterday is history, tomorrow is unknown but today could be a whole lot better.
@MacPhlea

Offline Offline

Posts: 2321





Ignore
« Reply #37 on: Monday, March 25, 2013, 17:48:36 »

Caddis' called up for Scotland

Not sure if that will add or detract from his value...
Logged
Dr Pierre Chang
ITK Curran lover

Offline Offline

Posts: 3005





Ignore
« Reply #38 on: Monday, March 25, 2013, 20:00:19 »

Can't be any worse than Millers recent form...don't think Benson is what we are missing mind.
Logged
TheMajorSTFC

Offline Offline

Posts: 2304





Ignore
« Reply #39 on: Monday, March 25, 2013, 20:40:37 »

Can't be any worse than Millers recent form...don't think Benson is what we are missing mind.

He's scored a few for Cheltenham, wouldn't have minded having him here and scoring those goals for us instead.
Logged

#VivaKenBarlow!
Batch
Not a Batch

Offline Offline

Posts: 55496





Ignore
« Reply #40 on: Monday, March 25, 2013, 20:52:57 »

Caddis' called up for Scotland

Desperation.

Hasn't he got any English grandparents?
Logged
Dr Pierre Chang
ITK Curran lover

Offline Offline

Posts: 3005





Ignore
« Reply #41 on: Monday, March 25, 2013, 20:53:15 »

3 in 12. Hardly prolific.

Don't get me wrong he was superb last season but doesn't offer anything different from what we have here.
Logged
Batch
Not a Batch

Offline Offline

Posts: 55496





Ignore
« Reply #42 on: Monday, March 25, 2013, 20:55:30 »

Better at heading than anyone we have. Better at finishing. Fox in the box. In my opinion obviously.  Would be nice to have him as another option, but we don't.
Logged
TheMajorSTFC

Offline Offline

Posts: 2304





Ignore
« Reply #43 on: Monday, March 25, 2013, 20:57:55 »

3 in 12. Hardly prolific.

Don't get me wrong he was superb last season but doesn't offer anything different from what we have here.

It's not prolific, but as I said he's scored a few and I'd rather they were for us than them. Also agree with Batch about his attributes, just a shame we don't have him as an option on the bench.
Logged

#VivaKenBarlow!
kerslakeisgod

Offline Offline

Posts: 33




Ignore
« Reply #44 on: Monday, March 25, 2013, 22:15:41 »

Its  not  all  about   Bensons  goal  scoring  tally,  but  his  hold  up  play  &  the   ability  to  bringing  other  players  into  the   further  attacking  positions  surely.  Prime  example  Dave  Mitchell  so  under-rated  but  so  badley  missed.     
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Up
Print
Jump to: