Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 [6] 7   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Who is the new player?  (Read 12248 times)
kaufman

« Reply #75 on: Thursday, March 22, 2012, 09:23:05 »

On another forum someone asks how many players we've used this season as it's a cheat way to manage using so many players, I looked on http://swindon-town-fc.co.uk/ and counted about 33 to 34 we've used this season, not as many as i thought.
Logged
london_red

Offline Offline

Posts: 2142





Ignore
« Reply #76 on: Thursday, March 22, 2012, 09:31:41 »

On another forum someone asks how many players we've used this season as it's a cheat way to manage using so many players, I looked on http://swindon-town-fc.co.uk/ and counted about 33 to 34 we've used this season, not as many as i thought.

38 according to the FL website

http://www.football-league.co.uk/page/DivisionalPlayersUsed/0,,10794~201126,00.html

By no means the most in the league, and only 3 more than Crawley and 5 more than Southend and Poxford. Don't think it's something that can really be used as a criticism of us 'cheating' our way to the top of the division.

Hasn't worked out that way for Northampton (45 players), Daggers (41) or Bradford (40) has it?
Logged
[email protected]

Offline Offline

Posts: 273


Want to change my name as this email doesn't exist




Ignore
« Reply #77 on: Thursday, March 22, 2012, 09:37:58 »

The interesting bit is how many of those players are still with us.  A good percentage have been shipped out, or it appears are no longer first or even second choice players.
Logged
blah blah

Offline Offline

Posts: 454




Ignore
« Reply #78 on: Thursday, March 22, 2012, 10:01:54 »

You usually associate the successful clubs with using a smaller amount of players - consistency in selection quite often results in a successful run at this level (a bit different at the top of the Prem obviously where they can afford a huge squad of internationals). I guess Cheltenham being at the bottom of this list is an example of this. Its usually the clubs struggling at the bottom that use more players - how many did we use in our Premiership season ?
Logged
tans
You spin me right round baby right round

Offline Offline

Posts: 24857





Ignore
« Reply #79 on: Thursday, March 22, 2012, 10:02:56 »

91
Logged
blah blah

Offline Offline

Posts: 454




Ignore
« Reply #80 on: Thursday, March 22, 2012, 10:05:47 »

seemed more than that

Brian Kilcline.. Crying
Logged
Trashbat?

Offline Offline

Posts: 1561





Ignore
« Reply #81 on: Thursday, March 22, 2012, 10:19:49 »

Years ago loan players were for a month or 3 months if they did well and you would only have 1 or 2 at a time.
Most clubs have a revolving door of loan players these days
Logged
Posh Red
Posh by name, Posh by nature

Offline Offline

Posts: 7192





Ignore
« Reply #82 on: Thursday, March 22, 2012, 10:25:32 »

If I remember correctly in one of the seasons in which we won the play-off final we had a run of approx 15-20 games where we fielded the same starting XI.

Might be total bollocks but if true would suggest that having a settled team has its advantages.
Logged
tans
You spin me right round baby right round

Offline Offline

Posts: 24857





Ignore
« Reply #83 on: Thursday, March 22, 2012, 10:32:08 »

Most clubs have a revolving door of loan players these days

Crawley.
Logged
kaufman

« Reply #84 on: Thursday, March 22, 2012, 11:52:24 »

38 according to the FL website

http://www.football-league.co.uk/page/DivisionalPlayersUsed/0,,10794~201126,00.html

By no means the most in the league, and only 3 more than Crawley and 5 more than Southend and Poxford. Don't think it's something that can really be used as a criticism of us 'cheating' our way to the top of the division.

Hasn't worked out that way for Northampton (45 players), Daggers (41) or Bradford (40) has it?

Cheers
Logged
Bedford Red

Offline Offline

Posts: 4543


Smithers Jones




Ignore
« Reply #85 on: Thursday, March 22, 2012, 12:37:44 »

If I remember correctly in one of the seasons in which we won the play-off final we had a run of approx 15-20 games where we fielded the same starting XI.

Might be total bollocks but if true would suggest that having a settled team has its advantages.

It was 89-90 and it was around 20 games in a row under Ardiles, that was the days of 2 subs as well. Usually Shaun Close and one other (Cornwell, Galvin, Simpson etc).
Logged
Baggins

Offline Offline

Posts: 600




Ignore
« Reply #86 on: Thursday, March 22, 2012, 13:43:12 »

38?  Who have I missed?

1. Lanzano
2. P Smith
3. Foderingham
4. Kennedy
5. Ridehalgh
6. Cibocchi
7. Comazzi
8. Devera
9. Flint
10. McCormack
11. Risser
12. Caddis
13. Cox
14. Ritchie
15. Ferry
16. J Smith
17. Rooney
18. Bodin
19. De Vita
20. Holmes
21. Benson
22. Connell
23. Tehoue
24. Gabilondo
25. Timlin
26. Thompson
27. Esajas
28. Clarke
29. Magera
30. Murray
31. Abdulla
32. Kerrouche
33. Jervis
34. Montano
35. Boateng
36.
Logged
phelpsieboy

« Reply #87 on: Thursday, March 22, 2012, 13:45:44 »

Storey
Louis Thompson ?
Logged
tans
You spin me right round baby right round

Offline Offline

Posts: 24857





Ignore
« Reply #88 on: Thursday, March 22, 2012, 14:14:15 »

Didnt realise mceveley has played 29 games this season.
Logged
kerry red

« Reply #89 on: Thursday, March 22, 2012, 14:15:25 »

Shaun Close - ah, that was a player (not) - couldn't hit a cow's arse with a banjo

Worst forward since Roy Greenwood
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 [6] 7   Go Up
Print
Jump to: