Posh Red
Posh by name, Posh by nature
 Offline
Posts: 7275
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Thursday, January 12, 2012, 19:04:00 » |
|
It's on here. http://www.thefootballforum.net/index.php?/topic/202857-the-port-vale-park-league-away-support-thread-201112/The thread is now 19 pages long, as the crowds are posted as the season goes along. Being a sad old git I have been keeping them in a spreadsheet. There are some numbers missing, but the away averages at the moment are Average Travelling Fans 876 Swindon T 841 Oxford U 759 Port Vale 739 Plymouth A 657 Bradford C 618 Bristol R 586 Southend U 576 Gillingham 563 Wimbledon 466 Shrewsbury 446 Rotherham U 432 Torquay U 373 Northampton 323 Crawley T 288 Crewe A 283 Hereford U 255 Burton A 253 Aldershot T 248 Cheltenham T 212 Barnet 192 Dag & Red 147 Morecambe 136 Macclesfield 106 Accrington S |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Abrahammer
Offline
Posts: 4823
A legitimate dude sighting
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Thursday, January 12, 2012, 19:08:40 » |
|
Plymouth's figure is far more impressive than ours or Oxford's considering their geographical and league positions.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dozno9
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Thursday, January 12, 2012, 19:30:17 » |
|
Considering it takes an hour to get out of Devon its good going.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spencer_White
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Thursday, January 12, 2012, 20:26:42 » |
|
It's on here. http://www.thefootballforum.net/index.php?/topic/202857-the-port-vale-park-league-away-support-thread-201112/The thread is now 19 pages long, as the crowds are posted as the season goes along. Being a sad old git I have been keeping them in a spreadsheet. There are some numbers missing, but the away averages at the moment are Average Travelling Fans 876 Swindon T 841 Oxford U 759 Port Vale 739 Plymouth A 657 Bradford C 618 Bristol R 586 Southend U 576 Gillingham 563 Wimbledon 466 Shrewsbury 446 Rotherham U 432 Torquay U 373 Northampton 323 Crawley T 288 Crewe A 283 Hereford U 255 Burton A 253 Aldershot T 248 Cheltenham T 212 Barnet 192 Dag & Red 147 Morecambe 136 Macclesfield 106 Accrington S Nice one. If you are updating every week could you post it on here? Id be interested. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
leefer
Offline
Posts: 12851
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Thursday, January 12, 2012, 20:40:18 » |
|
Nice one. If you are updating every week could you post it on here? Id be interested.
Agreed. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChalkyWhiteIsGod
TOLD YOU SO
Offline
Posts: 6401
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Thursday, January 12, 2012, 20:43:06 » |
|
shit from Oxford considering we gave them 3300
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 55363
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Thursday, January 12, 2012, 20:49:22 » |
|
Plymouth's figure is far more impressive than ours or Oxford's considering their geographical and league positions.
Shame about their home attendances though. Talking of which, its amazing that 5 clubs in league 1 have over 12K average attendances. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Gerinthere
Offline
Posts: 149
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Thursday, January 12, 2012, 21:02:04 » |
|
From that website I see we've still got the best defensive record in all four divisions.
The most clean sheets and the fewest goals conceded...
And also Macclesfield have the fewest goals scored in the league who are conveniently our next home opponents. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
suttonred
Offline
Posts: 12510
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Thursday, January 12, 2012, 21:57:42 » |
|
And also Macclesfield have the fewest goals scored in the league who are conveniently our next home opponents.
Tenner on 0-0 then methinks |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Posh Red
Posh by name, Posh by nature
Offline
Posts: 7275
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Thursday, January 12, 2012, 22:01:54 » |
|
Nice one. If you are updating every week could you post it on here? Id be interested.
I try to do it every week or so. I will post it when I update it |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Posh Red
Posh by name, Posh by nature
Offline
Posts: 7275
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Sunday, January 15, 2012, 13:41:07 » |
|
After yesterday's games, the numbers now are
850 Swindon T
844 Oxford U
759 Port Vale
749 Plymouth A
657 Bradford C
615 Southend U
610 Bristol R
593 Gillingham
555 AFC Wimbledon
502 Shrewsbury T
446 Rotherham U
429 Torquay U
401 Northampton T
317 Crawley T
310 Crewe A
299 Hereford U
270 Cheltenham T
270 Burton A
252 Aldershot T
201 Barnet
201 Dag & Red
156 Morecambe
148 Macclesfield T
114 Accrington S
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
axs
naaarrrrrppppp
Offline
Posts: 13469
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Sunday, January 15, 2012, 14:29:45 » |
|
How come oxford's changed? they were at home?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Posh Red
Posh by name, Posh by nature
Offline
Posts: 7275
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Sunday, January 15, 2012, 14:31:27 » |
|
How come oxford's changed? they were at home?
Because I found the actual number for one of their games that was missing. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
axs
naaarrrrrppppp
Offline
Posts: 13469
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Sunday, January 15, 2012, 14:35:55 » |
|
ah.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Posh Red
Posh by name, Posh by nature
Offline
Posts: 7275
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Tuesday, February 21, 2012, 11:44:15 » |
|
Latest averages are below.
There are some figures missing or estimated (Macclesfield & Burton are notoriously bad at provide away figures)
862 Oxford U
846 Swindon T
721 Plymouth A
682 Port Vale
660 Bristol R
603 Bradford C
588 AFC Wimbledon
555 Southend U
547 Gillingham
532 Shrewsbury T
436 Rotherham U
394 Torquay U
386 Northampton T
304 Crewe A
304 Crawley T
298 Cheltenham T
293 Hereford U
275 Aldershot T
266 Burton A
212 Barnet
178 Dag & Red
156 Morecambe
132 Macclesfield T
110 Accrington S
Had we have given the scummers the same number of tickets they have given us, their average would be about 90 less.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
