Benzel
 Offline
Posts: 6153
|
 |
« Reply #660 on: Thursday, August 18, 2011, 10:37:53 » |
|
Yeah that was a fucking disgraceful decision.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Is your cat making too much noise all the time?
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 55272
|
|
« Reply #661 on: Thursday, August 18, 2011, 10:53:15 » |
|
Di Vita was taken clean out.
Their pen was hard to be 100% on, he was either taken clean out or, as it looks on the video/from Caddis reaction, flicked the ball on and fell over making sure to run into Caddis leg. Whichever stance you take it was less of a penalty than the Di Vita one.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ibelieveinmrreeves
Should've gone to Specsavers
Offline
Posts: 3857
|
|
« Reply #662 on: Thursday, August 18, 2011, 11:45:18 » |
|
The ref should be very embarrased for the award of their penalty. Ridiculous.
And maybe it's just me but I can't tell if Doe gets a toe to the ball? It's either a bloody magnificent tackle or a stone wall pen.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Even men with steel hearts love to see a dog on the pitch.
|
|
|
Parkin09
Offline
Posts: 237
|
|
« Reply #663 on: Thursday, August 18, 2011, 12:14:14 » |
|
he goes through the back of Rafa and gets the ball that way, so it's a pen.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
walrus
Offline
Posts: 4228
|
|
« Reply #664 on: Thursday, August 18, 2011, 12:16:50 » |
|
Irregardless, we shouldn't be failing to score at Dagenham.
Penalty decisions go for and against you. Over the course of the season you hope they even themselves out, but the award of the penalty is not what cost us the game.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Parkin09
Offline
Posts: 237
|
|
« Reply #665 on: Thursday, August 18, 2011, 12:17:50 » |
|
well...it technically is as they beat us by one goal (one shot) and it was a penalty  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dannywilliamsisgod
Offline
Posts: 59
|
|
« Reply #666 on: Thursday, August 18, 2011, 12:21:06 » |
|
Irregardless, we shouldn't be failing to score at Dagenham.
Penalty decisions go for and against you. Over the course of the season you hope they even themselves out, but the award of the penalty is not what cost us the game.
This |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Charles
Offline
Posts: 7
|
|
« Reply #667 on: Thursday, August 18, 2011, 13:33:32 » |
|
Irregardless, we shouldn't be failing to score at Dagenham.
Penalty decisions go for and against you. Over the course of the season you hope they even themselves out, but the award of the penalty is not what cost us the game.
Irregardless you say. How does this differ from regardless? How irirritating. Shall we irrewind and start again? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 55272
|
|
« Reply #668 on: Thursday, August 18, 2011, 13:36:22 » |
|
Irregardless you say. How does this differ from regardless?
It's been embiggened, which I think is cromulent. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
walrus
Offline
Posts: 4228
|
|
« Reply #669 on: Thursday, August 18, 2011, 13:55:57 » |
|
Technically, irregardless is not a word but can be used in an informal, colloquial context for emphasis, which was precisely my meaning on here....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
Offline
Posts: 12514
|
|
« Reply #670 on: Thursday, August 18, 2011, 15:00:15 » |
|
Irregardless of that, the beauty of the English language is that if a word is in general use by the population then it gets entered into the dictionary.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Doore
|
|
« Reply #671 on: Thursday, August 18, 2011, 15:03:17 » |
|
Irregardless of that, the beauty of the English language is that if a word is in general use by the population then it gets entered into the dictionary.
Irregardlessy, I think your point is mutumbulous. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
Offline
Posts: 12514
|
|
« Reply #672 on: Thursday, August 18, 2011, 15:04:58 » |
|
You're going to have to invent a definition too, Billy.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bob's Orange
Has brain escape barriers
 Online
Posts: 28493
|
|
« Reply #673 on: Thursday, August 18, 2011, 15:09:37 » |
|
Has Walrus swallowed a dictionary recently?
Wasn't he the fella that used to go out drink driving and being sick on people and the like?
Where did it all go wrong!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
we've been to Aberdeen, we hate the Hibs, they make us spew up, so make some noise,
the gorgie boys, for Hearts in Europe.
|
|
|
walrus
Offline
Posts: 4228
|
|
« Reply #674 on: Thursday, August 18, 2011, 15:11:36 » |
|
I know, I grew old, beige and conformist... Although I'm still a conformist that vomits everywhere!  Mutumbulous made me chuckle, I may have to gently bring that word into circulation. I'm convinced I brought mong back from the doldrums after it's demise from popular use in the early '90s. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
