Your choice.

[Don Rogers Shop]

Lumps its all about opinions and personal preference.No one knows how it will turn out but the way you make everyone out to be total twats for not sharing your opinion is a bit off mate.

[Spencer_White]

Initially I was well chuffed that Burley was interested in the job, so I rang my Southampton supporting mate, and he said avoid Burley like the plague. Make of that what you want, but I trust his opinion.

[BANGKOK RED]

With the other names in the hat, I'm not convinced Di Canio is the best available option.

But if they do choose him, I think they should be applauded on making a brave decision.

[BANGKOK RED]

With the other names in the hat, I'm not convinced Di Canio is the best available option.

But if they do choose him, I think the board should be applauded on making a brave decision.

[pauld]

Initially I was well chuffed that Burley was interested in the job, so I rang my Southampton supporting mate, and he said avoid Burley like the plague. Make of that what you want, but I trust his opinion.

Funnily enough I spoke to my Saints supporting mate and he said pretty much the complete opposite. Opinions, like arseholes....

[Costanza]

Burley would be a good solid appointment. So was Sturrock. So was Malpas (ahem). So was Wilson. Where are we? Back in League Two... Let's think outside the box.

[Iffy's Onion Bhaji]

Initially I was well chuffed that Burley was interested in the job, so I rang my Southampton supporting mate, and he said avoid Burley like the plague. Make of that what you want, but I trust his opinion.

Yeah i've read up on Burley a bit and i'm less keen than I was when it first came to light he was in the running.

[Batch]

Burley would be a good solid appointment. So was Sturrock. So was Malpas (ahem). So was Wilson. Where are we? Back in League Two... Let's think outside the box.

We were promoted under Sturrock, and nearly promoted under Wilson. A little bit of luck and we could have been just relegated from the championship

We'll ignore Malpas.

Burley isn't my first choice, but I won't be disappointed by him.

[Costanza]

Neither would I Batch. I think my point is that we've had respected steady managers... Let's get people talking about Swindon Town's ambition.

People want Hamann or Di Canio ahead of Burley, so what!?! It doesn't mean that everyone will say "oh for fuck sake" if Burley was to be appointed.

...Well, Spencer might

[Mplanney]

Hamann is my choice, but have changed my mind several times as they all have different advantages

[Barry Scott]

Point taken and agreed with but I wouldnt call him a success!

No you're right, I suppose he's not. I think Southgate, as mentioned by town23, was a success though, just unfairly treated.

To add another, Hughton was. What about Coleman?

[OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR]

Any reason why you quoted yourself there? Or did you just do because you could

[BANGKOK RED]

^

Quite possibly for the same reason you quoted something from me with no text in it.

Some internet gubbins. I.E. I don't know.

[Lumps]

Initially I was well chuffed that Burley was interested in the job, so I rang my Southampton supporting mate, and he said avoid Burley like the plague. Make of that what you want, but I trust his opinion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Southampton_F.C._managers

Did he say why? On results he looks, Hoddle aside, like he performed better than anyone since 1949. Do you think his opinion could be coloured by the situation they were in (relegated from the prem for the first time under Redknapp and not bouncing back first time like they might have hoped).

[Lumps]

Burley would be a good solid appointment. So was Sturrock. So was Malpas (ahem). So was Wilson. Where are we? Back in League Two... Let's think outside the box.

All of those did pretty well for us, except Malpas who had no real record as a manager, (one shit season with 'Well aside).