|
Piemonte
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Thursday, June 30, 2005, 12:29:59 » |
|
He might be, but unless we can swap him with fallon for example then it aint going to happen due to the fee involved.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RappersDelight
Offline
Posts: 246
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Thursday, June 30, 2005, 15:18:12 » |
|
even better, we can get rid of fallon at the same time!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Everybody's Smokin' - No one's gettin' high!
|
|
|
red macca
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Thursday, June 30, 2005, 15:27:29 » |
|
i reckon the board would allow 50-75k to spend still
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
magnum150
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Thursday, June 30, 2005, 15:30:20 » |
|
Burgess was rumored to be £250K.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Piemonte
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Thursday, June 30, 2005, 15:42:03 » |
|
i reckon the board would allow 50-75k to spend still why? they cut the wage budget by £200k. what makes you think that we've cash to spend on transfer fees?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
unclemark
Offline
Posts: 690
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Thursday, June 30, 2005, 15:42:03 » |
|
Now that we are getting thorpe and cureton we will have enough strikers for a swap.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
kaufman
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Thursday, June 30, 2005, 16:00:25 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
unclemark
Offline
Posts: 690
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Thursday, June 30, 2005, 16:10:49 » |
|
We simply don't need that many front men , but if they can play in midfield...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
le god cuervo
Offline
Posts: 1168
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Thursday, June 30, 2005, 16:17:30 » |
|
i think its great we have 5 strikers! gives a lot of competition for places & puts pressure on them to score goals.
remember last season when we just had parkin & fallon to start with, fallon knew he was guaranteed to start and got lazy. the same probably would have happened this season with roberts, so this is a kick up the arse to all of them.
besides, roberts and cureton can both play out wide, and caton doesnt count yet
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
unclemark
Offline
Posts: 690
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Thursday, June 30, 2005, 16:25:19 » |
|
good point , but I would rather have burgess than fallon
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
alex
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Thursday, June 30, 2005, 19:40:11 » |
|
good point , but I would rather have burgess than fallon Yeh i have to agree. I think it would be nice to have 5 strikers next year, but at the moment, we don't seem to have a midfield! Although ideally i would keep burgess and fallon, i think that a central midfielder is needed far more than a striker at the moment. After sitting around on the bench for two seasons, I expect fallon wants a change anyway... would suit all parties involved.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Thursday, June 30, 2005, 20:04:16 » |
|
Id sooner have Burgess than Fallon, Rory gives it his all but i cant see him getting 10 goals in a season and thats no good im afraid.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|