Ginginho
 Offline
Posts: 6867
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: Friday, June 11, 2010, 08:52:12 » |
|
It would be interesting to see what would happen if a firm offer of £2M+ comes in.
Would he get out of bed then I wonder?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
stfcinbmth
|
|
« Reply #31 on: Friday, June 11, 2010, 09:05:15 » |
|
It would be interesting to see what would happen if a firm offer of £2M+ comes in.
Would he get out of bed then I wonder?
Let's hope not |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
herthab
TEF Travel
Offline
Posts: 12020
|
|
« Reply #32 on: Friday, June 11, 2010, 09:07:08 » |
|
It would be interesting to see what would happen if a firm offer of £2M+ comes in.
Would he get out of bed then I wonder?
We'd be mental not to take an offer like that! I'd rip their arm off. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
It's All Good..............
|
|
|
Ginginho
Offline
Posts: 6867
|
|
« Reply #33 on: Friday, June 11, 2010, 09:14:03 » |
|
Indeed
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
axs
naaarrrrrppppp
Offline
Posts: 13469
|
|
« Reply #34 on: Friday, June 11, 2010, 10:00:34 » |
|
We could buy and pay wages for about 4 players with £2 million. I take it in a shot.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32369
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #35 on: Friday, June 11, 2010, 10:03:09 » |
|
We'd also need to replace 49 goals upfront.
Money or not - that won't be easy.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ginginho
Offline
Posts: 6867
|
|
« Reply #36 on: Friday, June 11, 2010, 10:08:57 » |
|
I think we said the same thing last season when Cox left.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Don Rogers Shop
|
|
« Reply #37 on: Friday, June 11, 2010, 10:15:41 » |
|
And to be fair up until October we were correct.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32369
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #38 on: Friday, June 11, 2010, 10:16:32 » |
|
Well, that was only 31 goals!!
...but...after Cox it was obvious improving our goal keeping and defending would some what counter act the huge loss of goals.
This season we've had a good defence and keepers, sure there is always room for improvement but not enough for the same kind of drastic improvement we saw from Coxs season to last season.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nevillew
Tripping the light puntastic
Offline
Posts: 4156
|
|
« Reply #39 on: Friday, June 11, 2010, 10:25:19 » |
|
We'd also need to replace 49 goals upfront.
Money or not - that won't be easy.
20 goals - We're already landed with replacing Paynter's |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Paolo Di Canio, it's Paolo Di Canio
|
|
|
leefer
Offline
Posts: 12851
|
|
« Reply #40 on: Friday, June 11, 2010, 10:27:35 » |
|
It would be interesting to see what would happen if a firm offer of £2M+ comes in.
Would he get out of bed then I wonder?
2 million would be taken....if it already hasn,t. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32369
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #41 on: Friday, June 11, 2010, 10:28:42 » |
|
Where's Div with his maths degree when you need him?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 55527
|
|
« Reply #42 on: Friday, June 11, 2010, 12:35:58 » |
|
20 goals - We're already landed with replacing Paynter's
(20 Goals + Paynters Goals + new penalty takers goals) - Payters Penalties = still lots of goals to replace. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nevillew
Tripping the light puntastic
Offline
Posts: 4156
|
|
« Reply #43 on: Friday, June 11, 2010, 12:41:33 » |
|
Any striker worthy of the name should be able to take and score penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Paolo Di Canio, it's Paolo Di Canio
|
|
|
leefer
Offline
Posts: 12851
|
|
« Reply #44 on: Friday, June 11, 2010, 12:44:53 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
