Matchworn Shirts
For Sale
Offline
Posts: 7471
|
 |
« Reply #5055 on: Wednesday, November 2, 2011, 16:21:32 » |
|
When Chelseas' team is the united nations the irony is unbelievable
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jimmy_onions
Offline
Posts: 1165
|
 |
« Reply #5056 on: Wednesday, November 2, 2011, 16:22:57 » |
|
pretty much what I was getting at...JT? England captain?..do me a favour.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Coca Fola
|
 |
« Reply #5057 on: Thursday, November 3, 2011, 15:42:49 » |
|
Waking up when it's almost dark. Whole day gone, very depressing.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
stfcinbmth
|
 |
« Reply #5058 on: Thursday, November 3, 2011, 15:51:13 » |
|
Waking up when it's almost dark. Whole day gone, very depressing.
Lazy git 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Coca Fola
|
 |
« Reply #5059 on: Thursday, November 3, 2011, 15:52:29 » |
|
I went to bed at 5am for some reason.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Miles Mayhem
Offline
Posts: 1405
|
 |
« Reply #5060 on: Thursday, November 3, 2011, 16:00:51 » |
|
shut in cola fola has a certain ring to it 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Coca Fola
|
 |
« Reply #5061 on: Thursday, November 3, 2011, 16:01:38 » |
|
Que?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Baggins
Offline
Posts: 600
|
 |
« Reply #5062 on: Thursday, November 3, 2011, 19:13:36 » |
|
People who use @ instead of "at" in a sentence. How fucking lazy r u?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
Offline
Posts: 12851
|
 |
« Reply #5063 on: Thursday, November 3, 2011, 19:58:25 » |
|
People who use @ instead of "at" in a sentence. How fucking lazy r u?
It might seem that I'm picking on you tonight, but I'm not. Do you understand irony at all? Jesus wept.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Barry Scott
Offline
Posts: 9135
|
 |
« Reply #5064 on: Thursday, November 3, 2011, 21:06:51 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27183
|
 |
« Reply #5065 on: Thursday, November 3, 2011, 21:14:25 » |
|
People who use @ instead of "at" in a sentence. How fucking lazy r u?
Tw@ See what I did there?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Exiled Bob
Offline
Posts: 1579
Likes a moan
|
 |
« Reply #5066 on: Thursday, November 3, 2011, 23:04:16 » |
|
To be honest I should of said Rickie Lambert doing so well in the championship
People who write should of/could of/would of instead of should have/could have/would have. It's bad enough that people say it, but write it correctly at least......... Oh, and people who don't know where apostrophes go too. Not to mention people who don't know when to use "too" or "to".
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ironside
Wir müssen die Liberalen ausrotten
Offline
Posts: 1475
|
 |
« Reply #5067 on: Thursday, November 3, 2011, 23:19:31 » |
|
People who write should of/could of/would of instead of should have/could have/would have. It's bad enough that people say it, but write it correctly at least.........
Oh, and people who don't know where apostrophes go too. Not to mention people who don't know when to use "too" or "to".
Loose/Lose
|
|
|
Logged
|
Genius, Gentleman Explorer, French Cabaret Chantoose and Small Bets Placed and someone who knows who they are changed my signature but its only know that I can be arsed to change it....and I mean all the spelling mistakes.
Was it me? It can't have been an interesting enough event for me to remember - fB.
|
|
|
betty_swollox
Offline
Posts: 132
|
 |
« Reply #5068 on: Thursday, November 3, 2011, 23:24:38 » |
|
People who write should of/could of/would of instead of should have/could have/would have. It's bad enough that people say it, but write it correctly at least.........
Oh, and people who don't know where apostrophes go too. Not to mention people who don't know when to use "too" or "to".
Agreed. Although I'm sometimes one of those people who write should of, but I am dyslexic. I do get really annoyed at people (mainly facebook mongs) who don't know the difference between your/you're/you'll. Even I make an extra effort to go back over my sentences to check I haven't made these kind of mistakes. Either half the population is dyslexic also or they're just too lazy to check over their writing. *please note if I've made any mistakes in my paragraph then was definitely meant to be ironic.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bobby
Offline
Posts: 171
|
 |
« Reply #5069 on: Thursday, November 3, 2011, 23:26:20 » |
|
Twitter
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|