Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Peacock back to being a striker  (Read 4944 times)
Colin Todd

Offline Offline

Posts: 3318




Ignore
« Reply #30 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 12:34:53 »

Quote from: "Don Rogers Shop"
Ok lets say they were crucial then. I still maintain Peacock will not score the goals that will give us a promotion push

Obviously thats just my opinion


You are probably right. Trouble is Paynter wont either.  And in the contest of the Strikers who dont score enough Peacock contributes more to the team in general, through ariel ability and work rate.

I'd fancy corrs chances more than the other 2 if he could stay fit for most of a season, which he wont.
Logged
Arriba

Offline Offline

Posts: 21289





Ignore
« Reply #31 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 12:35:40 »

proof that all peacocks interviews are bollocks imo.

as for a striker, if thats where malpas sees him then fine but we wont be doing anything in the league imo if thats the option up front.
we need guaranteed goals, and with our current forward options i aint filled with much hope.
i bet the tickets office doors are getting beaten down with people demanding season tickets.NOT!
we need new bodys if we are going to push on and progress.the current lot, if not added to, will remain a mid table side.
its alright getting the books balanced but the team on show is the product on offer.if its shit then people wont want to buy into it.its that simple
Logged
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36318




« Reply #32 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 12:38:43 »

I love the way everyone is already pre-judging Lee Peacock's performances.
Logged
Arriba

Offline Offline

Posts: 21289





Ignore
« Reply #33 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 12:41:23 »

how amny games has he already played?hardly pre judging
Logged
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36318




« Reply #34 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 12:45:56 »

How many games has he played up front for us?
Logged
Arriba

Offline Offline

Posts: 21289





Ignore
« Reply #35 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 12:46:28 »

too many
Logged
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36318




« Reply #36 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 12:48:43 »

Count them
Logged
Arriba

Offline Offline

Posts: 21289





Ignore
« Reply #37 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 12:49:09 »

no
Logged
Don Rogers Shop

« Reply #38 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 12:50:55 »

I am judging him on previous performances Si and what he has publicly said himself
Logged
Tails

Offline Offline

Posts: 10011


Git facked




Ignore
« Reply #39 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 12:51:48 »

Then shut up. Peacock played 6 games up front and scored 3 goals. 50% aint bad.
Logged
Tails

Offline Offline

Posts: 10011


Git facked




Ignore
« Reply #40 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 12:54:12 »

Then shut up. Peacock played 6 games up front and scored 3 goals. 50% aint bad.
Logged
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36318




« Reply #41 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 12:56:30 »

I thought he looked useful at the end of the season, certainly seemed a goal threat.

I just think it's a bit harsh to criticise a player in a position he has not played in for a long long time (save the last few games).
Logged
Arriba

Offline Offline

Posts: 21289





Ignore
« Reply #42 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 12:56:35 »

he says what he has to at the time don.

the way i see it is we either play as a tight unit, leak few goals and grind out wins.
 malpas has stated he wants to pass the ball meaning thats out.
so to me that means we will need to score goals to progress.peacock isn't clinical enough to bag the necessary amount imo.
he is a good utility squad player who could do a fill in job almost anywhere.but an out and out forward with a progressive club i dont think is the way forward at all.

all this will be doing payneter confidence the world of good aswell.he's on a hiding to nothing as i see it.
paynter and blair will not feature alot as i see it at this current time.corr is all down to his fitness
Logged
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36318




« Reply #43 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 13:00:17 »

Swansea went up ok with just one decent goalscorer.
Logged
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36318




« Reply #44 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 13:02:44 »

Oh wait, Doncaster and Forest had an abundence strikers who could put away 15-20 a season too.

The argument that you need two strikers that can get 15-20 goals each is rubbish in my opinion. It got us close a few years back but Brighton proved that a team which leaks as many as it scores is beatable.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5   Go Up
Print
Jump to: