janaage
People's Front of Alba
Offline
Posts: 14825
|
|
« Reply #15 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 09:10:26 » |
|
I still maintain he is. If he played an entire season up front with Cox, i would put money on them scoring 35-40 goals between them. Where's that post with the nomination of "deluded poster of the year" in it??? Peacock would struggle to get into double figures, and that'd leave Cox a lot to do!! (Although I do believe this I really wouldn't mind Lee P proving me wrong!!)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
McLovin
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 09:14:09 » |
|
I was referring to a Paynter/Cox partnership, Jan!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
janaage
People's Front of Alba
Offline
Posts: 14825
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 09:15:58 » |
|
I was referring to a Paynter/Cox partnership, Jan! Oh were you?? I thought you were talking about the cock!! Oh fair enough, well in that case I'd say there'd be a good chance of that happening, 12-15 goals from Billy, 22-27 from Cox, that's achievable.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16352
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 10:24:08 » |
|
to be fair to peacock, he does score us some crucial goals
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
Don Rogers Shop
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 10:37:40 » |
|
when?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16352
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 11:03:50 » |
|
The games hes scored in for us:
4-2 win Vs bournmouth 1-1 Draw Vs hartlepool 1-0 win Vs Hartlepool 2-0 win Vs chester (x2) 1-1 draw Vs accrington 3-0 win Vs grimsby 2-1 defeat Vs macclesfield 2-1 win Vs wycombe 1-0 win Vs Franchise 2-0 Win Vs Maclsefield 3-2 win Vs lincoln 2-1 win Vs luton 2-1 defeat Vs port vale 2-1 Defeat Vs leeds 2-2 draw Vs oldham 3-0 win vs oldham 6-0 win vs port vale
i make that 17 points he's won us. not bad for a non-goalscorer
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
Don Rogers Shop
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 11:09:31 » |
|
Not really crucial though Dave
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 15985
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 11:11:52 » |
|
Not really crucial though Dave Agreed. It's not like we needed those 17 points :? I'm sure somebody will happily come in and point out that somebody elsein that position would have done equally well if not better, but Paynter, Corr and Sturrock have all failed to do that.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Don Rogers Shop
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 11:18:50 » |
|
Not really crucial though Dave Agreed. It's not like we needed those 17 points :? I'm sure somebody will happily come in and point out that somebody elsein that position would have done equally well if not better, but Paynter, Corr and Sturrock have all failed to do that. Peacock scored 2 more goals than Sturrock last season of course goals are important but they were not "crucial" .Sturrock against Forest Green could be seen as crucial shall we keep him aswell.Easton scored 6 goals last year shall we chuck him up front aswell. Peacock this time last year himself said he is not a striker anymore
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 15985
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 11:38:45 » |
|
Not really crucial though Dave Agreed. It's not like we needed those 17 points :? I'm sure somebody will happily come in and point out that somebody elsein that position would have done equally well if not better, but Paynter, Corr and Sturrock have all failed to do that. Peacock scored 2 more goals than Sturrock last season of course goals are important but they were not "crucial" .Sturrock against Forest Green could be seen as crucial shall we keep him aswell.Easton scored 6 goals last year shall we chuck him up front aswell. Peacock this time last year himself said he is not a striker anymore The point is Dave justified his claim by saying Peacock got us 17 points. I haven't checked but I'm pretty sure Blair didn't. You have to consider that Peacock scored a lot of those from midfield aswell
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Don Rogers Shop
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 11:50:04 » |
|
Ok lets say they were crucial then. I still maintain Peacock will not score the goals that will give us a promotion push
Obviously thats just my opinion
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
herthab
TEF Travel
Offline
Posts: 12020
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 11:51:23 » |
|
Ok lets say they were crucial then. I still maintain Peacock will not score the goals that will give us a promotion push
Obviously thats just my opinion I always thought you liked the cock...............
|
|
|
Logged
|
It's All Good..............
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 15985
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 11:52:37 » |
|
Ok lets say they were crucial then. I still maintain Peacock will not score the goals that will give us a promotion push
Obviously thats just my opinion I am tempted to agree. I think it will depend who we bring into midfield, especially on the right wing. We need to play the right way if Peacock is going to score goals. If teh tactic is Jamie Vincent banging it into the corner for him to chase we have no chance
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
janaage
People's Front of Alba
Offline
Posts: 14825
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 11:57:32 » |
|
Actually R4e, this season he got us a massive 3 points using your logic. Hardly an achievement to rave about!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Don Rogers Shop
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 11:57:49 » |
|
Agree reeves we need a winger simalar to mcnamee and a decent left back.
Herthab i have heard i can file a sexuall harrasment case against you even if it is on the net.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|