|
Hmonkey
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 18:18:05 » |
|
it was a stupid attempt at a foul by zaaboub which probably deserved a booking for intent but no way a red card.
styles lost the plot in the second half
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 18:42:07 » |
|
He did lunge but he was nowhere near the man, a booking would have sufficed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC_Chris
Charlie Croker
 Offline
Posts: 1472
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 18:44:10 » |
|
maybe this will be the lesson for sofi that he should pass it earlier, and not get caught on the ball. Good point, there was two or three occasions where he could have layed it off to Cox but instead he tried to take on their entire team. :x |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
santini
Offline
Posts: 890
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 18:49:40 » |
|
Another childish lunge just because he lost the ball. He has no one to blame but himself.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33082
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 18:51:09 » |
|
Another childish lunge just because he lost the ball. He has no one to blame but himself. but a red card though, pull the other one. On another note, is Nicho injured? or just out of favour? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 18:57:50 » |
|
I can understand why it was given. I don't think it deserved a red card because he missed, but Zaboub can be a petulant little fucker - if he makes contact there it's a leg-breaker and therefore a red card is fair enough
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 16036
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 18:59:26 » |
|
Another childish lunge just because he lost the ball. He has no one to blame but himself. but a red card though, pull the other one. On another note, is Nicho injured? or just out of favour? Judging by the post-match interview both Nicholas and Blackburn have been injured but will be back very soon |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33082
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 18:59:29 » |
|
it wasnt even close to being a leg breaker?! he was sliding on the floor for starters. It wasnt above the ball.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 19:02:31 » |
|
He let the deck Dan and by the letter of the law you can be sent off for that- I'm not going to have a row with you over it, harsh red I agree, I do however understand why Styles gave it. In a funny way it also calmed a potential ruck - quick card, no brawl - as opposed to a yellow and a huge riot.
It was a daft tackle. Not malicious but he needs to learn not to be so stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sonic youth
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 19:10:37 » |
|
i don't understand what this "intent" offence is - he went for the ball, is that illegal?
it didn't look as though he went in over the height of the ball and although it was a stupid challenge, it was his first tackle and a straight red was fucking absurd.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 16036
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 19:12:05 » |
|
i don't understand what this "intent" offence is - he went for the ball, is that illegal?
it didn't look as though he went in over the height of the ball and although it was a stupid challenge, it was his first tackle and a straight red was fucking absurd. Ok Sonic... By intent, they mean malicious intent. So he would have to have been trying to actually harm the guy for it to be a straight red |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Hmonkey
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 19:12:29 » |
|
i don't understand what this "intent" offence is - he went for the ball, is that illegal?
it didn't look as though he went in over the height of the ball and although it was a stupid challenge, it was his first tackle and a straight red was fucking absurd. but he didn't go for the ball he went for the man and the useless twat didn't get anywhere near him |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sonic youth
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 19:13:27 » |
|
he went to win the ball, there was hardly any contact with the man!
so how the fuck do you use intent as justification?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Hmonkey
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 19:16:27 » |
|
how did he go to win the ball? the rovers player was running away from zaaboub and he lunged to try and catch his legs.
it was a stupid pointless attempt at a foul which he deserved a booking for but styles had lost it and gave him a red to even things up.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bennett
No Comment
Offline
Posts: 9555
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 19:16:51 » |
|
from the TE it seemed like a late lunge really, nothing else.
i intend to find phillips mum and make him watch etc
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
This is the water.
And this is the well.
Drink full and descend.
The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
|
|
|
|
