Luci
Offline
Posts: 10862
Fatbury's Stalker
|
|
« on: Tuesday, September 11, 2007, 12:35:00 » |
|
Ok, think we'll win this but not as easily as we beat Israel.
I guess the main selection problem for MacLaren is between Crouch or Heskey.
Lampard and Hargreaves have still been ruled out also.
I'd go with Heskey as Crouch can be clumsy and I thought Heskey did enough to keep his place Saturday - He will cause their defence problems.
I'd personally keep the squad unchanged from Saturday.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Online
Posts: 32293
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday, September 11, 2007, 12:36:36 » |
|
I wouldnt call that a selection problem personally. Heskey all the way.
The team did nothing wrong last game and even I thought they played well, no need to change it at all.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
herthab
TEF Travel
Offline
Posts: 12020
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday, September 11, 2007, 12:36:52 » |
|
Ok, think we'll win this but not as easily as we beat Israel.
I guess the main selection problem for MacLaren is between Crouch or Heskey.
Lampard and Hargreaves have still been ruled out also.
I'd go with Heskey as Crouch can be clumsy and I thought Heskey did enough to keep his place Saturday - He will cause their defence problems.
I'd personally keep the squad unchanged from Saturday. The problem is that Mclaren won't.
|
|
|
Logged
|
It's All Good..............
|
|
|
tans
You spin me right round baby right round
Offline
Posts: 25046
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday, September 11, 2007, 12:36:56 » |
|
It will be a draw i reckon, im going for 1-1.
Owen to score i think.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Luci
Offline
Posts: 10862
Fatbury's Stalker
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday, September 11, 2007, 12:37:21 » |
|
Well MacLaren has hinted at changes..............That is what I would consider to be the main position of speculation.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Luci
Offline
Posts: 10862
Fatbury's Stalker
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Tuesday, September 11, 2007, 12:39:30 » |
|
Course MacLaren won't - he won't be able to resist tampering with it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC Village
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Tuesday, September 11, 2007, 12:40:59 » |
|
I'd bring Crouch back in for Heskey. We've won all 6 games where Owen & Crouch have started up front
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bushey Boy
Offline
Posts: 8351
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Tuesday, September 11, 2007, 12:52:30 » |
|
Id put crouch in, im going to this and cant wait! Should be ace!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Kinky Tom
Snow Master Sandwich King.
Offline
Posts: 8887
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Tuesday, September 11, 2007, 13:08:00 » |
|
Same 11 for me, if either Barry or Heskey are dropped it will be a disgrace as far as I'm concerned.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
McLovin
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday, September 11, 2007, 13:10:18 » |
|
There is no need to change it. I see a 2-0 win...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter Venkman
We don't need no stinking badges.
Offline
Posts: 59383
Things can only get better
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday, September 11, 2007, 13:51:50 » |
|
Crouch every time, gonna be close but hopefully a 1-0 win.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Only a fool does not know when to hold his tongue.
|
|
|
Matchworn Shirts
For Sale
Offline
Posts: 7085
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Tuesday, September 11, 2007, 15:11:05 » |
|
england will win, you shouldn't change a winning team
|
|
|
Logged
|
I come from a land down-under
|
|
|
Bennett
No Comment
Offline
Posts: 9509
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday, September 11, 2007, 16:45:18 » |
|
There is no need to change it. I see a 2-0 win... spookey same here. i'm excited
|
|
|
Logged
|
This is the water. And this is the well. Drink full and descend. The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
|
|
|
FlashGordon
Offline
Posts: 913
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday, September 11, 2007, 16:53:25 » |
|
Same 11 for me, if either Barry or Heskey are dropped it will be a disgrace as far as I'm concerned. completely agree
|
|
|
Logged
|
Come on YOU REDS!
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Tuesday, September 11, 2007, 17:35:27 » |
|
Unless there is a late injury then the team should be the same as Saturday!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|