STFCBird
Ralphy's Wet Dream
 Offline
Posts: 10673
C U Next Tuesday!
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Thursday, March 31, 2005, 12:18:34 » |
|
Don't be so horrible to me. you will make me cry
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Thursday, March 31, 2005, 12:22:42 » |
|
Again? Not my fault I've got a huge...... ego.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
oxford_fan
Offline
Posts: 6764
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Thursday, March 31, 2005, 13:40:05 » |
|
i hope mickey lives, he was fun.
much better than stanley/j1mmy/the crap that's been on here recently.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ben Wah Balls
Offline
Posts: 5972
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 00:12:25 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 00:17:06 » |
|
Didn't think so either but I've had my say  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 00:23:16 » |
|
The girls in the picture didn't look of age to me, either way I didn't spend very long debating whether or not it was, I just deleted it. I couldn't give a shit what Mickey has to say about it, would you honestly believe a word that bloke says? The picture was hosted on his photobucket account. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ben Wah Balls
Offline
Posts: 5972
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 00:32:10 » |
|
It wasn't at all sexual. Is the cover of nevermind child porn?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 00:33:53 » |
|
Is this all going to degenerate into a debate about what constitutes child porn and what doesn't?
It was a picture of naked people who were underage. It's not exactly suitable for this forum, that's why I deleted the picture and banned him.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
oxford_fan
Offline
Posts: 6764
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 00:39:53 » |
|
sonic's doing a voluntary 'job' very well and i don't think we should be debating this really.
mickey wouldn't bother posting an image which isn't likely to cause offence or some kind of reaction.
so let's just leave it there?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ben Wah Balls
Offline
Posts: 5972
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 00:41:22 » |
|
Sure delete it but banning him's a bit over the top I reckon. :|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
STFC Village
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 00:41:44 » |
|
sonic's doing a voluntary 'job' very well and i don't think we should be debating this really.
mickey wouldn't bother posting an image which isn't likely to cause offence or some kind of reaction.
so let's just leave it there?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 00:44:30 » |
|
Sure delete it but banning him's a bit over the top I reckon. :| I wasn't going to ban him originally, I saw the post and deleted it and went back to watching Hollyoaks. I changed my mind for a couple of reasons, because I thought it was sick that he'd bothered to look for it and also because he posted it to get himself banned. To be fair I'd appreciate trying to keep this sort of drama out of the forums, if anyone wants to discuss it can you PM me in future please? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
STFC Village
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 00:46:43 » |
|
But then we wouldn't be able to read it  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 00:49:14 » |
|
seriosuly though that's gotta fucking hurt
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
STFC Village
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 00:52:39 » |
|
Seriously dmr? Thats sick, none of us want to see that shit
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
