Bushey Boy
Offline
Posts: 8351
|
|
« Reply #15 on: Wednesday, August 1, 2007, 15:55:46 » |
|
Agreed bart, you talk sense
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
tans
You spin me right round baby right round
Offline
Posts: 25258
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Wednesday, August 1, 2007, 15:56:42 » |
|
Agreed bart, you talk sense Are you being sarcastic ?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16355
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Wednesday, August 1, 2007, 15:57:35 » |
|
Oh no lets panic. Its not as if the transfer window closes anytime soon is it. We'll be foine
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
tans
You spin me right round baby right round
Offline
Posts: 25258
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Wednesday, August 1, 2007, 16:00:10 » |
|
Oh no lets panic. Its not as if the transfer window closes anytime soon is it. We'll be foine exactamundo now weve signed a welsh bloke called mohammed, how about we sign - an irish bloke called muhadjeen a scottish bloke called bam bam kak pao and some random bloke from the british virgin islands icing on the cake
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
lambourn red
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Wednesday, August 1, 2007, 16:00:21 » |
|
Pre season means fuck all, I can remember previous pre seasons where we have looked gash and got into the playoffs and others where we thought we were going to do well and have been embroiled in a relegation battle. Until the first couple of league games have been played it is very difficult to see how things will pan out and by then HOPEFULLY we will have at least another striker and winger
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
Offline
Posts: 12551
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Wednesday, August 1, 2007, 16:02:12 » |
|
Bam Bam Kak Pao is a fucking ace player! would love to see him here.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
tans
You spin me right round baby right round
Offline
Posts: 25258
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Wednesday, August 1, 2007, 16:03:12 » |
|
imagine getting that on the back of a shirt
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 11802
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Wednesday, August 1, 2007, 16:04:12 » |
|
while Bart is being a little on the negative side :shock:
we should at least start the season with some realism rather than doing a Bristol City and expecting promotion from a squad which is not really up to it. Better to do it that way, provided the support remains positive than have everyone moaning if we sit 18th after 10 games.
2005/06 our team could have been:
Evans J Smith Nicholas Ifil O'Hanlon Shakes Miglioranzi Pook Brown Fallon Cureton
Now, there are definitely some better defensive option in the current squad with Aljofree signing, Easton better than Pook etc. On the wings we are probably better although they still seem unable to deliver. That team does suggest more creativity upfront though (even allowing for peoples hatred towards Cureton). Migz offered a decent passing scope from midfield.
That team was one if not the worst teams in the league that season, by a distance at times. Can we honestly say we are in a much better state talent wise?
Our saving grace this time around is we shouldn't lose as many as easily with a decent Manager at the helm, and, IF things improve off the field we have a basis to build on. But right now we are several First Teamers away from being anything other than also rans. That can change though of course.
edit: just to confirm I do no expect us to be relegated based on the current squad and Management team.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32414
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Wednesday, August 1, 2007, 16:09:02 » |
|
2005/06 our team could have been:
Evans < Smith J Smith Nicholas Ifil < Ifil 2007 O'Hanlon < Aljofree Shakes < Roberts Miglioranzi - Easton Pook < Peacock Brown < Zaaboub Fallon > Sturrock Cureton > no one
Not to metion Sturrock >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> King + Iffy Bar some strikers, and maybe some back up wingers we are fine. In an ideal world I'd like to see a minimum of 2 new strikers and 2 new wingers. Its not the end of the world yet, I can see us getting alot of 1-0 score lines next season - both ways Plus despite finishing 3rd, we were easily the best side to get promoted out of league two and should finish above Rovers, Hartlepool and Walsall!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
herthab
TEF Travel
Offline
Posts: 12020
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Wednesday, August 1, 2007, 16:12:22 » |
|
Yeah Bart is making sense.
I mean Chelsea lost a friendly to MK Dongs, so they must be thinking that they've got a relegation fight on their hands!
The truth is that we played a friendly last night with two trialists up front, neither of which has played in English football, one who only met the rest of the team yesterday.
The team looked rusty at times, ironing that out is what pre season is all about.
We won't be in a relegation battle this season.
Bart is a twat...........................
|
|
|
Logged
|
It's All Good..............
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 11802
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Wednesday, August 1, 2007, 16:14:18 » |
|
Don't disagree. I did say based on what we currently have.
Strikers make a huge difference though. A good defence stops you getting beat, a good attack wins you games (more often than not).
Stick Fallon and Cureton (even the not trying very hard one) upfront with out current 1-9, add in Corr and I'd say mid table comfortably. That's how much difference I think it can make. We'd have been a laughing stock in 2005/06 if Fallon hadn't suddenly discovered he could play football. As it was we were mostly soft.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32414
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Wednesday, August 1, 2007, 16:17:20 » |
|
We'd have been a laughing stock in 2005/06 if Fallon hadn't suddenly discovered he could play football. we then turned ourselves into a laughing stock by selling him, biut I wont go off on that one again
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 11802
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Wednesday, August 1, 2007, 16:22:27 » |
|
Yep, at the time I think I fell on the side of not maoning about his sale, based on the belief we'd invest in replacements, which we never did.
The 4-2 win against Bournemouth was a sign I suppose of what we could have gone on to achieve. With 3 strikers looking hungry that game we looked a different team at times, which is exactly why I think the current team is better but not one to do much. It wouldn't take much to make that improvement, but the questions is whether we'll be able to get 2 decent forwards in. They don't have to be 20 a season players, just players who both offer a threat.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32414
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Wednesday, August 1, 2007, 16:25:41 » |
|
more fool you...
....the day we sold him was the day I claimed we got relegated.
Negative pessimistic bastard they called me, selling Fallon was the right move they told me.
But, yeah it is getting on and still nothing on the striker front....and we do need at least two.
Hopefully (wishfully, prayingly!!) the lack of signing more strikers means Big Bad Baz might not be out for as long as we've been told.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 11802
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Wednesday, August 1, 2007, 16:28:51 » |
|
I'd still want 2 plus him.
The thing that's getting me confused right now is in one breath everyone is saying we look toothless and ni the other they are asking for every forward on trial to be signed-up. There is no point wasting a position on a player who may look ok but simply doesn't give us the threat we are after. They either look like they'll be a first teamer and be as good if not better than the other teams strikers, or they don't. We don't need squad players upfront, we need the first string.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|