OK, like can somebody spell it out for me in words of one syllable.
I don't get why the club calling in all the money they can to pay staff has on influence of whether we should continue to sponsor a player. Surely the decision has nothing to do with this. Morally we are either OK sponsoring a player, or we aren't. End of?
Either way if too many people have pulled out to make it viable then you can chuck my money at Whits too.
I think some people are upset that the club has almost threatened they will lose the player's sponsorship unless they get a shift on and do it by close of play - when it is rumoured the only reason for this threat is to get the money in to pay staff.
Not a rumour anymore though is it? Ben Lambert has confirmed it according to Fred in the management thread
I don't think that changes why people are upset.
Anyway, the club not paying staff by BACS may have been substantiated, but the reason for hurrying the sponsor money has not.