Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Scott Murray  (Read 5023 times)
Bennett
No Comment

Offline Offline

Posts: 9523





Ignore
« Reply #30 on: Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:29:50 »

i would prefer to see ricky shakes stay than us get scott murray
Logged

This is the water.
And this is the well.
Drink full and descend.
The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36319




« Reply #31 on: Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:35:20 »

Quote from: "magic8ball"
Quote from: "simon pieman"
scott murray would be mint


Like these?

http://smartpei.typepad.com/robert_patersons_weblog/murray%20mints.jpg


glad someone got my awful humour.

Not fussed about Murray really. Would be decent for competition, but given our budget I'd say no.
Logged
reeves4england

Offline Offline

Posts: 16005


We'll never die!




Ignore
« Reply #32 on: Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:36:00 »

Quote from: "bennett"
i would prefer to see ricky shakes stay than us get scott murray
Muray got 9 goals this season, not bad for a winger really...
Logged
sonic youth

« Reply #33 on: Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:37:15 »

i'd rather we signed trebor.
Logged
Bennett
No Comment

Offline Offline

Posts: 9523





Ignore
« Reply #34 on: Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:38:03 »

Quote from: "reeves4england"
Quote from: "bennett"
i would prefer to see ricky shakes stay than us get scott murray
Muray got 9 goals this season, not bad for a winger really...


not at all... i'd still rather see ricky back here though
Logged

This is the water.
And this is the well.
Drink full and descend.
The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
Ralphy

Offline Offline

Posts: 14189





Ignore
« Reply #35 on: Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:39:42 »

I can't stand Scott Murray.

Cunt of the highest order.
Logged
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36319




« Reply #36 on: Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:40:56 »

Quote from: "Ralphy"
I can't stand Scott Murray.

Cunt of the highest order.


I guess it confirms the theory of opposites attracting  Cheesy
Logged
Ralphy

Offline Offline

Posts: 14189





Ignore
« Reply #37 on: Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:43:46 »

Very good Si.
Logged
Mark Hanrahan

Offline Offline

Posts: 631





Ignore
« Reply #38 on: Sunday, May 20, 2007, 20:04:32 »

Quote from: "DV85"
Quote from: "sam_stfc"
I hate to admit it, but he'd be a very good signing.


3 years ago....


Nah - that lad still has a bit of quality about him. Makes sense with him being just down the road.

Alright he's a proper sh1tbag but getting him on a free is good business.
Logged

"Great save, Digby."
Spud

« Reply #39 on: Sunday, May 20, 2007, 21:20:00 »

Quote from: "Ralphy"
I can't stand Scott Murray.

Cunt of the highest order.


 Yes
Logged
neville w

« Reply #40 on: Monday, May 21, 2007, 11:01:14 »

Quote from: "simon pieman"
Quote from: "magic8ball"
Quote from: "simon pieman"
scott murray would be mint


Like these?

http://smartpei.typepad.com/robert_patersons_weblog/murray%20mints.jpg


glad someone got my awful humour.

Not fussed about Murray really. Would be decent for competition, but given our budget I'd say no.


I've heard Everton are interested ?
Logged
stfctownenda

Offline Offline

Posts: 1818





Ignore
« Reply #41 on: Tuesday, May 22, 2007, 08:29:15 »

Found this from a couple of weeks back so think it would be very unlikely hes coming here:

http://www.bcfc.co.uk/page/WTPSDetail/0,,10327~1022720,00.html
Logged
red macca

« Reply #42 on: Tuesday, May 22, 2007, 08:39:17 »

He has been offered a contract to stay...but if its only a year and at the age of 32 that may not be good enough who knows..

He scored 9 goals from the wing this year and i dont think we are in a position not to take a look at that sort of player.

would i be right in saying peacock not included are midfield did not score 9 goals between them last year
Logged
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick

Offline Offline

Posts: 16357





Ignore
« Reply #43 on: Tuesday, May 22, 2007, 08:50:13 »

Quote from: "red macca"
He has been offered a contract to stay...but if its only a year and at the age of 32 that may not be good enough who knows..

He scored 9 goals from the wing this year and i dont think we are in a position not to take a look at that sort of player.

would i be right in saying peacock not included are midfield did not score 9 goals between them last year



Zaaboub - 1
Shakes - 2
Brown - 2
Monkhouse - 2
Evans - 4
Pook - 2
Weston - 1
Timlin - 1

Thats 15 all together,  14 of which are league goals. So no, you'd be wrong
Logged

Things get better but they never get good
red macca

« Reply #44 on: Tuesday, May 22, 2007, 08:57:04 »

Quote from: "swindon town dave"
Quote from: "red macca"
He has been offered a contract to stay...but if its only a year and at the age of 32 that may not be good enough who knows..

He scored 9 goals from the wing this year and i dont think we are in a position not to take a look at that sort of player.

would i be right in saying peacock not included are midfield did not score 9 goals between them last year



Zaaboub - 1
Shakes - 2
Brown - 2
Monkhouse - 2
Evans - 4
Pook - 2
Weston - 1
Timlin - 1

Thats 15 all together,  14 of which are league goals. So no, you'd be wrong


Zaaboub - 1
Shakes - 2- gone
Brown - 2-gone
Monkhouse - 2-gone
Evans - 4-???
Pook - 2
Weston - 1 -gone
Timlin - 1-gone

That 4 or 7 depending on evans

Im right  Cheesy
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Up
Print
Jump to: