Bennett
No Comment
Offline
Posts: 9523
|
|
« Reply #30 on: Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:29:50 » |
|
i would prefer to see ricky shakes stay than us get scott murray
|
|
|
Logged
|
This is the water. And this is the well. Drink full and descend. The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36319
|
|
« Reply #31 on: Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:35:20 » |
|
glad someone got my awful humour. Not fussed about Murray really. Would be decent for competition, but given our budget I'd say no.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 16005
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #32 on: Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:36:00 » |
|
i would prefer to see ricky shakes stay than us get scott murray Muray got 9 goals this season, not bad for a winger really...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonic youth
|
|
« Reply #33 on: Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:37:15 » |
|
i'd rather we signed trebor.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bennett
No Comment
Offline
Posts: 9523
|
|
« Reply #34 on: Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:38:03 » |
|
i would prefer to see ricky shakes stay than us get scott murray Muray got 9 goals this season, not bad for a winger really... not at all... i'd still rather see ricky back here though
|
|
|
Logged
|
This is the water. And this is the well. Drink full and descend. The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14189
|
|
« Reply #35 on: Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:39:42 » |
|
I can't stand Scott Murray.
Cunt of the highest order.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36319
|
|
« Reply #36 on: Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:40:56 » |
|
I can't stand Scott Murray.
Cunt of the highest order. I guess it confirms the theory of opposites attracting
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14189
|
|
« Reply #37 on: Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:43:46 » |
|
Very good Si.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mark Hanrahan
Offline
Posts: 631
|
|
« Reply #38 on: Sunday, May 20, 2007, 20:04:32 » |
|
I hate to admit it, but he'd be a very good signing. 3 years ago.... Nah - that lad still has a bit of quality about him. Makes sense with him being just down the road. Alright he's a proper sh1tbag but getting him on a free is good business.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Great save, Digby."
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #39 on: Sunday, May 20, 2007, 21:20:00 » |
|
I can't stand Scott Murray.
Cunt of the highest order.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
neville w
|
|
« Reply #40 on: Monday, May 21, 2007, 11:01:14 » |
|
glad someone got my awful humour. Not fussed about Murray really. Would be decent for competition, but given our budget I'd say no. I've heard Everton are interested ?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
red macca
|
|
« Reply #42 on: Tuesday, May 22, 2007, 08:39:17 » |
|
He has been offered a contract to stay...but if its only a year and at the age of 32 that may not be good enough who knows..
He scored 9 goals from the wing this year and i dont think we are in a position not to take a look at that sort of player.
would i be right in saying peacock not included are midfield did not score 9 goals between them last year
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16357
|
|
« Reply #43 on: Tuesday, May 22, 2007, 08:50:13 » |
|
He has been offered a contract to stay...but if its only a year and at the age of 32 that may not be good enough who knows..
He scored 9 goals from the wing this year and i dont think we are in a position not to take a look at that sort of player.
would i be right in saying peacock not included are midfield did not score 9 goals between them last year Zaaboub - 1 Shakes - 2 Brown - 2 Monkhouse - 2 Evans - 4 Pook - 2 Weston - 1 Timlin - 1 Thats 15 all together, 14 of which are league goals. So no, you'd be wrong
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
red macca
|
|
« Reply #44 on: Tuesday, May 22, 2007, 08:57:04 » |
|
He has been offered a contract to stay...but if its only a year and at the age of 32 that may not be good enough who knows..
He scored 9 goals from the wing this year and i dont think we are in a position not to take a look at that sort of player.
would i be right in saying peacock not included are midfield did not score 9 goals between them last year Zaaboub - 1 Shakes - 2 Brown - 2 Monkhouse - 2 Evans - 4 Pook - 2 Weston - 1 Timlin - 1 Thats 15 all together, 14 of which are league goals. So no, you'd be wrong Zaaboub - 1 Shakes - 2- gone Brown - 2-gone Monkhouse - 2-gone Evans - 4-??? Pook - 2 Weston - 1 -gone Timlin - 1-gone That 4 or 7 depending on evans Im right
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|