Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
 |
« on: Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 13:18:17 » |
|
......re CG redevelopment, daresay Holt could do with a bit of support from anyone seriously bothered about the club progressing.
The local freebie paper has started its own anti campaign, which of course has not been countered.....even going so far as to conflate a proposed build on the site of the Swindon Bowling Club, as somehow to do with STFC.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 13:20:40 » |
|
hmmm whatever we do we will be objected! people have lost interest now. despite the trusts efforts to make this happen i dont think it will because no matter where we go the old biddies and the single mums will always complain
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36336
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 13:35:58 » |
|
hmmm whatever we do we will be objected! people have lost interest now. despite the trusts efforts to make this happen i dont think it will because no matter where we go the old biddies and the single mums will always complain if only Sussex Red was around to distract all the single mums 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sussex
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 14:40:17 » |
|
hmmm whatever we do we will be objected! people have lost interest now. despite the trusts efforts to make this happen i dont think it will because no matter where we go the old biddies and the single mums will always complain if only Sussex Red was around to distract all the single mums  I don't think I could get there in time 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sussex
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 14:44:21 » |
|
hmmm whatever we do we will be objected! people have lost interest now. despite the trusts efforts to make this happen i dont think it will because no matter where we go the old biddies and the single mums will always complain if only Sussex Red was around to distract all the single mums  I don't think I could get there in time 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36336
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 14:45:53 » |
|
why post the same thing 4 minutes later? are those single mums distracting you instead now?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 14:47:07 » |
|
hahaha
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sussex
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 14:48:20 » |
|
I did that the other night too.
I've worked out why it happened though. I'm thick.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yeo
Offline
Posts: 3651
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 15:01:15 » |
|
......re CG redevelopment, daresay Holt could do with a bit of support from anyone seriously bothered about the club progressing.
The local freebie paper has started its own anti campaign, which of course has not been countered.....even going so far as to conflate a proposed build on the site of the Swindon Bowling Club, as somehow to do with STFC. Reggie isnt this meeting for residents only? From what Ive read about this Central Outlook rag it seems that its one person trying to stir the shit up a bit.Its all to do with losing some of the "open" spaces near the ground and what constitutes open space.The Bowls club,Cricket Ground and Athletics track obviously aren't open space because they have gates around them and are only used by the clubs.I cant see it being problem as all will (I assume) be offered alternative sights with improved amenities.The plans for the area are supposed to take into account the residents need for a bit of green space and after the problems with Shaw(went up there this morning and Ive still never seen anyone there) the developers would be stupid to try and fob them off.
|
|
|
Logged
|
/ W56196272
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 15:03:44 » |
|
just what is at shaw tip? i mean the residents moaned all day long but to save what? the only thing i would have moaned about was traffic because the whole of west swindon would have been bought to a halt
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36336
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 15:10:24 » |
|
just what is at shaw tip? i mean the residents moaned all day long but to save what? the only thing i would have moaned about was traffic because the whole of west swindon would have been bought to a halt a field, a couple of trees, yeovil red and his dog
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yeo
Offline
Posts: 3651
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 15:13:22 » |
|
Theres a very young forest on a hill,its quite nice up there to be honest .There would have been more than enough room up there for 10 football grounds and still have a massive nature reserve but thats old ground so to speak.
|
|
|
Logged
|
/ W56196272
|
|
|
Dazzza
Offline
Posts: 8265
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 15:42:11 » |
|
just what is at shaw tip? i mean the residents moaned all day long but to save what? the only thing i would have moaned about was traffic because the whole of west swindon would have been bought to a halt a field, a couple of trees, yeovil red and his dog I mentioned this on the Trust site and promptly the only ever person I have ever known to go up there regularly, a Mr Johnathan Doyle promptly appeared and declared that it was the Mecca for nature lovers miles around. Personally I herd it was quite a hot spot for dogging, but I wouldn’t want to cast aspersions! Has this rag got an online linkage?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 16126
We'll never die!
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 17:17:46 » |
|
:Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 17:45:58 » |
|
......re CG redevelopment, daresay Holt could do with a bit of support from anyone seriously bothered about the club progressing.
The local freebie paper has started its own anti campaign, which of course has not been countered.....even going so far as to conflate a proposed build on the site of the Swindon Bowling Club, as somehow to do with STFC. Reggie isnt this meeting for residents only? From what Ive read about this Central Outlook rag it seems that its one person trying to stir the shit up a bit.Its all to do with losing some of the "open" spaces near the ground and what constitutes open space.The Bowls club,Cricket Ground and Athletics track obviously aren't open space because they have gates around them and are only used by the clubs.I cant see it being problem as all will (I assume) be offered alternative sights with improved amenities.The plans for the area are supposed to take into account the residents need for a bit of green space and after the problems with Shaw(went up there this morning and Ive still never seen anyone there) the developers would be stupid to try and fob them off. So you just turn up and say you live in Shrivenham Road who's to know? Although the Cricket club and athletics are members things, they are still open spaces of a sort, ie empty of people and traffic etc. The best way to get this going will be to promise the Council a purpose built mosque somewhere on the site.....Muslims are allowed to watch live matches, but not on the TV, so that's shouldn't be a problem......the club can then acuse the council of racism if they don't come on board.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|