|
glos_robin
|
 |
« on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 21:23:41 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
magicroundabout
Fanta Pants
 Offline
Posts: 8746
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 21:24:46 » |
|
and it's not even friday :shock:
reg wont be pleased
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32383
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 21:27:17 » |
|
clubs lawyers letter
point 2 we dont know who we are dealing with
point three then mentions Power by now?!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
glos_robin
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 21:31:44 » |
|
That statement is an absolute load of rubbish, they seem to contradict themselves every other paragraph. I can't wait for next Tuesday, will they be banning Orange from the ground in seven days time then?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
horlock07
Offline
Posts: 18730
Lives in Northern Bastard Outpost
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 21:33:46 » |
|
Nice to see that negotiations for this company that is apparently worth tens of millions of pounds are being undertaken in a confidential and professional manner!
I would be interested to see what the response is of the apologists for the board who have accused the Trust of being unprofessional by making media statements!!!
Just seems to be an attempt to muddy the already somewhat cloudly waters, they aint gonna sell in a month of Sundays, and sadly i do not really see what the consortium can do _ God I hope I am wrong!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 21:35:02 » |
|
and it's not even friday :shock:
reg wont be pleased :angry: |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 21:37:01 » |
|
I do think it important that there should be a boycott of this meeting....trying to drag Sturrock in is a disgrace.......
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 21:37:40 » |
|
Yes, yes STFC Board want us to hate the consortium - we get it!
:evil:
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 55541
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 21:39:00 » |
|
Does anyone else see the irony in the club issuing this statement to complain about things being handled in public?
Yes morte detail is needed from the consotium. It's not that difficult, sit down and talk in private under an NDA. Mr Wilks says he wishes to proceed this way, the board say they wish to proceed this way. Yet obsticle after obsticle gets put in the way of it happening.
Other than that this statement really isn't very exciting. I bet it was written by an American who isn't a fan of the club.
Standard STFC tactics at the end to lodge a wedge in the fan base with the Paul Sturrock quotes. Yes he may well feel that, and?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Luci
Offline
Posts: 10862
Fatbury's Stalker
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 21:39:05 » |
|
I do think it important that there should be a boycott of this meeting....trying to drag Sturrock in is a disgrace....... Because hes the only one out of the lot of them that the fans have any respect for. Mediator possibly! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE
Offline
Posts: 15736
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 21:40:48 » |
|
meh
:boring:
Pathetic !!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
magicroundabout
Fanta Pants
Offline
Posts: 8746
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 21:41:08 » |
|
I do think it important that there should be a boycott of this meeting....trying to drag Sturrock in is a disgrace....... noticed that. total farce and only disrupts the team even more. they go on about promotion etc yet drag PS into these meetings. just fucking go now please Board. your not wanted |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27137
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 21:41:09 » |
|
All in all, I read it like this:
TrustSTFC can fuck off, we'll deal directly with Power and Emmell.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 21:41:24 » |
|
Does anyone else see the irony in the club issuing this statement to complain about things being handled in public?? I do  This all seems so petty and unprofessional it's untrue. :nuts: |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36319
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 21:41:41 » |
|
The financial position has changed since August, I'd be VERY sure of that. How the fuck is it good enough to say Bill Power knows enough about the position is beyond me.
Removing Wills of all his liabilities seems like a substantiated offer to me.
I'm sure certain parties will thrilled their confidential letters have been publicly published
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
