Strange, seems he was willing to let the club go with no upfront money passing hands and no return of other monies, just monet upon development.
A Monet? Clearly that's where we've gone wrong in not including fine art in the deal
The deal being offered now seems better, yet we are being told they want cash upfront as well as the loans aid and the capital returned as well.
Ah, yes but don't forget since then the club has benefited from five years of "financial engineering", gone into two periods of administration and been relegated and so now has much more "potential"