Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 [6] 7   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Rodgers turns down offer  (Read 11438 times)
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant

Offline Offline

Posts: 15863




Ignore
« Reply #75 on: Tuesday, January 9, 2007, 21:51:05 »

what is the point of Peterborough? they have loads of money to spend so what do they do? go and buy a load of conference players  Soapy Tit Wank
Logged
Frigby Daser

Offline Offline

Posts: 3870





Ignore
« Reply #76 on: Wednesday, January 10, 2007, 09:46:30 »

on the adver site now looks as though Sturrock's another option better than Rodgers...
Logged
fatbury

« Reply #77 on: Wednesday, January 10, 2007, 09:55:32 »

well hes got to say that hasnt he? Tho lets hope hes right
Logged
Tails

Offline Offline

Posts: 10011


Git facked




Ignore
« Reply #78 on: Wednesday, January 10, 2007, 10:11:34 »

Quote from: "fatbury"
well hes got to say that hasnt he? Tho lets hope hes right


Well, no he hasn't.
Logged
fatbury

« Reply #79 on: Wednesday, January 10, 2007, 10:37:19 »

well the alternative is saying .. well Rodgers was better so we will have to make do with 2nd best if we cant get him ...  :nuts:
Logged
Tails

Offline Offline

Posts: 10011


Git facked




Ignore
« Reply #80 on: Wednesday, January 10, 2007, 10:39:11 »

Or maybe these new players came back to him or whatever after the bid was accepted for Rodgers?
Logged
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant

Offline Offline

Posts: 15863




Ignore
« Reply #81 on: Wednesday, January 10, 2007, 12:14:00 »

Abbott maybe? hmmm sounds good though
Logged
jimbob

Offline Offline

Posts: 1430





Ignore
« Reply #82 on: Wednesday, January 10, 2007, 14:15:32 »

could one of them could be chris brown from sunderland? as according to
the link below, they have accepted an offer from an unnamed club. Not exactly prolific....but could do alright at this level

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/s/sunderland/6247957.stm
Logged
Spud

« Reply #83 on: Wednesday, January 10, 2007, 14:44:46 »

I'd tell Rodgers to stick it now as he's had long enough to decide over a move to us.

Chris Brown was involved in that Sunderland orgy.  :shock:  :?
Logged
Scot Munroe

« Reply #84 on: Wednesday, January 10, 2007, 14:45:52 »

Quote from: "Spuddy_STFC"
I'd tell Rodgers to stick it now as he's had long enough to decide over a move to us.

Chris Brown was involved in that Sunderland orgy.  :shock:  :?


Yes he was. he was doing the shoddy camera work. :shock:  :shock:
Logged
flammableBen

« Reply #85 on: Wednesday, January 10, 2007, 14:57:19 »

his wikipedia page is quite amusing

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Brown_%28footballer%29

wonder how long it will take for it to be changed back.
Logged
hansgruber

Offline Offline

Posts: 1606




Ignore
« Reply #86 on: Wednesday, January 10, 2007, 14:59:35 »

Yet another player with a shit nickname.

Do better nicknames people!
Logged
Scot Munroe

« Reply #87 on: Wednesday, January 10, 2007, 15:03:56 »

Quote from: "flammableBen"
his wikipedia page is quite amusing

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Brown_%28footballer%29

wonder how long it will take for it to be changed back.


BYE BYE BROWN, YOU WONT BE MISSED - I HOPE YOUR CAREER NOSEDIVES FROM NOW ON...
Logged
red macca

« Reply #88 on: Wednesday, January 10, 2007, 15:44:28 »

Quote from: "SwindonUltra"
Quote from: "flammableBen"
his wikipedia page is quite amusing

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Brown_%28footballer%29

wonder how long it will take for it to be changed back.


BYE BYE BROWN, YOU WONT BE MISSED - I HOPE YOUR CAREER NOSEDIVES FROM NOW ON...
im confused by this statement ultra
Logged
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant

Offline Offline

Posts: 15863




Ignore
« Reply #89 on: Wednesday, January 10, 2007, 16:01:42 »

it says the offer for Brown is from Norwich so that won't be happening
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 [6] 7   Go Up
Print
Jump to: